HomeGoods sofa options in this lineup lean big and comfort-forward, with a mix of stationary builds and recliners meant for everyday lounging—not formal, upright “showroom” sitting. In our testing, the big wins were relaxed seat comfort, useful convenience features on the recliners, and easier-care upholstery on select models. The trade-offs showed up just as consistently: warmer fabrics, deep seats that can feel awkward for shorter legs, and large footprints. Overall, these picks make the most sense in TV-first living rooms, not minimalist small-space setups.
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayne Park Sand Sofa | 3.7 | Oversized, loungey feel | Runs warm; deep seat can be a mismatch | Movie nights when you want to sprawl |
| Treasure Trove Almond Sofa | 4.0 | Wipes down easily; sturdy feel | Leather can feel slick | Households that want low-fuss upkeep |
| Tarrant Reclining Sofa | 3.8 | Recline comfort; built-in table and USB | Needs clearance; chenille runs warm | Sports nights, gaming, feature seating |
| Leya Power Space Saver Sofa | 3.9 | Cooler seat feel; space-saver recline | Needs power access; cover care varies | Smaller rooms that still want recline |
Testing Team Takeaways
These four broke into two clear camps: oversized stationary sofas built for sprawl, and recliners meant for long sessions where convenience matters as much as cushioning. Treasure Trove felt the easiest to live with day to day, while Leya delivered the best mix of recline comfort and room-fit practicality. Jayne Park was the softest to sink into, but it also ran warmer and showed lint and pressure marks faster. Tarrant had the most useful built-ins, though it needs more space and a little more attention to fabric care.
HomeGoods Sofa Comparison Chart
| Feature | Jayne Park Sand Sofa | Treasure Trove Almond Sofa | Tarrant Reclining Sofa | Leya Power Space Saver Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Stationary | Stationary | Manual reclining | Power reclining (space-saver) |
| Overall dimensions | 96" W x 43" D x 41" H | 93" W x 40" D x 40" H | 86" W x 40" D x 40" H | 92" W x 38.5" D x 43" H |
| Upholstery | Plush velvety pile | Leather / faux-leather match | Polyester chenille | Fabric or leather options; Performa-Weave seat feel |
| Cushion construction | Reversible backs; made for lounging | High-resiliency foam + feather-fiber wrap | Foam + poly fiber wrap | Chaise-style seat; zipper-back access |
| Perceived seat depth | Deep | Medium-deep | Adjustable via recline | Medium-deep |
| Back support feel | Soft; add a lumbar pillow | More anchored, balanced | Most supportive in recline | Balanced, slightly cushy |
| Cooling / breathability | Warm | Neutral to cool | Warm | Coolest-feeling of the four |
| Cleaning & care | Shows lint and pressure marks | Wipes clean easily | Absorbs spills if you wait | Care depends on the cover choice |
| Best room fit | Larger living rooms | Mid-to-large spaces | Needs recline clearance | More wall-friendly layouts |
How We Tested It
Each sofa went through the same routine: unboxing and setup, then a week of real life—laptop work, two-hour movies, casual hosting, and quick naps. We scored assembly friction, cooling, comfort, durability cues, layout practicality, cleaning effort, and overall value. Comfort was broken into seat comfort, back support, and seat-depth fit, while layout included both everyday usability and how easy it was to shift positions as the room got used.
HomeGoods Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Jayne Park Sand Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Jayne Park’s first impression is all softness—the kind that makes you settle in and stay put. During laptop work, Carlos kept adjusting to avoid a rounded-shoulders posture, while Mia noticed right away that the deep seat nudged her into a tucked-leg position. It was great for late-night lounging, but I ended up adding a small lumbar pillow so I didn’t slowly slide forward.
What we liked
-
Big, loungey seat that invites you to sprawl
-
Soft surface comfort for long TV sessions
-
Reversible back cushions helped wear feel more even
Who it is best for
-
Taller users, or anyone who prefers deep-seat lounging
-
Living rooms where the sofa is the main hangout spot
Where it falls short
-
Shorter legs may feel too far back
-
Runs warm during long sessions
-
Lint and pressure marks show easily

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep, lounge-friendly sit | Warm feel over time |
| Relaxed movie-night comfort | Shorter users may struggle with fit |
| Reversible back cushions | Shows lint and pressure marks |

Details
-
Overall dimensions: 41" H x 96" W x 43" D
-
Model: PC8150638
-
Upholstery: plush velvety pile; toss pillows in chenille/slub yarn
-
Cushion setup: loose, reversible back cushions
-
Perceived cushion firmness: medium-plush
-
Cooling / breathability: tends to run warm
-
Support for different body sizes: best for average-to-tall loungers; petite testers may find it too deep
-
Cleaning: frequent lint rolling; occasional spot-cleaning
-
Pet-friendliness: moderate (hair clings to the fabric)
-
Durability: reversible cushions helped spread out day-to-day wear
-
Assembly: basic positioning and final setup
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.6 | Setup is straightforward, but it’s bulky to maneuver |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Soft, lounge-forward comfort for long sits |
| Back Support | 3.8 | Comfortable, but lumbar support helped |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.5 | Deep seat favors taller loungers over petite testers |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.3 | Runs warm during extended sessions |
| Durability | 3.8 | Reversible cushions helped maintain an even feel |
| Layout Practicality | 4.1 | Works best as a main anchor in a larger room |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.6 | Soft, deep seat can slow quick posture changes |
| Cleaning | 3.2 | Lint and marks require consistent upkeep |
| Value | 3.7 | Strong comfort, but maintenance is the trade-off |
| Overall Score | 3.7 | Best for sprawl-first living rooms |
Treasure Trove Almond Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Treasure Trove felt more structured the moment we sat down—less “sink,” more steady support, and a surface that didn’t hold heat the way plush fabrics can. During a shared movie night, Jenna and Ethan noticed fewer ripple effects when one person shifted. For laptop work, the seat stayed supportive, and the back didn’t slump when I leaned into it. Marcus also pointed out the firmer front edge when he perched to tie his shoes—more stable than the plush models.
What we liked
-
Easy wipe-down feel for everyday messes
-
Balanced support for upright and relaxed sitting
-
Firmer edge support for quick sit-stand moments
Who it is best for
-
Homes that want easier upkeep and fewer fabric headaches
-
Mixed-use seating: working, hosting, and TV nights
Where it falls short
-
Leather can feel slick for some loungers
-
Not as instantly “sink-in” as plush fabric sofas

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Wipes clean easily | Leather can feel slick |
| Balanced support for long sitting | Less “sink-in” plushness |
| Strong edge confidence | Surface can feel cool at first |

Details
-
Overall dimensions: 40" H x 93" W x 40" D
-
Model: 1930438
-
Frame: corner-blocked frame
-
Cushion setup: attached back; loose seat cushions
-
Cushion materials: high-resiliency foam wrapped in a feather-fiber blend
-
Upholstery: top-grain leather on contact areas; matched faux leather elsewhere
-
Perceived cushion firmness: medium
-
Cooling / breathability: generally neutral to cool
-
Support for different body sizes: a more universally supportive fit across testers
-
Cleaning: quick wipe-down for day-to-day messes
-
Pet-friendliness: higher than plush fabrics (hair clings less)
-
Durability: stable feel under repeated use and posture changes
-
Assembly: standard setup
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.7 | Typical setup effort; easier with two people |
| Seat Comfort | 4.1 | Comfortable without feeling overly sinky |
| Back Support | 3.9 | More consistent support through long sits |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.9 | Moderate depth made it easier to fit more bodies |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.1 | Holds less heat during longer sessions |
| Durability | 4.2 | Supportive build with a stable feel |
| Layout Practicality | 3.9 | Fits many living rooms without dominating |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.8 | Easy to shift positions without feeling stuck |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Easiest day-to-day maintenance in this group |
| Value | 3.8 | A strong balance of practicality and comfort |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | The most even performer overall |
Tarrant Reclining Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Tarrant was our most feature-heavy pick. On a long sports night, Marcus treated the drop-down table like a mini console, and the USB charging kept phones powered without cords snaking across the room. Because you can recline, seat-depth fit was easier to dial in—your hips land where you want them. Jamal liked it for post-work stretching, but he also called out the practical downside: you need clearance behind the sofa, and it isn’t something you’ll move around casually.
What we liked
-
Recline comfort for multi-hour sessions
-
Drop-down table and built-in charging convenience
-
Supportive feel once fully reclined
Who it is best for
-
Gaming, sports, and movie setups where features matter
-
Anyone who wants a more adjustable lounging posture
Where it falls short
-
Recline clearance demands extra space
-
Chenille runs warm and needs faster spill cleanup

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong recline comfort | Needs recline clearance |
| Drop-down table + USB | Warm fabric feel |
| Supportive in extended lounging | Harder to move and reposition |

Details
-
Overall dimensions: 40" H x 86" W x 40" D
-
Model: 9140589
-
Reclining: dual-sided recliner; middle seat stays stationary
-
Recliner release: pull tab
-
Frame: corner-blocked; metal reinforced seat
-
Upholstery: polyester chenille
-
Convenience features: drop-down table with cup holders and USB charging
-
Perceived cushion firmness: medium-plush (feels more supportive in recline)
-
Cooling / breathability: tends to run warm
-
Cleaning: spot-cleaning helps; the fabric can hold spills
-
Pet-friendliness: moderate (fabric can trap hair)
-
Durability: stable under heavier use and repeated recline cycles
-
Assembly: heavier handling; power cord management
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.4 | Heavier build; setup is doable but not effortless |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Cushiony, especially strong for reclined lounging |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Support is best once you’re reclined |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.1 | Recline flexibility helped fit different bodies |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.4 | Warm chenille feel during long sessions |
| Durability | 4.0 | Reinforced seating stayed stable in use |
| Layout Practicality | 3.7 | Needs space; not ideal for tight rooms |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.6 | Bulky; not something you shift around often |
| Cleaning | 3.3 | Fabric rewards quicker cleanup habits |
| Value | 4.1 | Features add real day-to-day convenience |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | The feature-forward choice |
Leya Power Space Saver Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Leya’s main advantage was fitting into a room that normally can’t spare the space for a recliner. The space-saver design let us recline without giving up the main walkways. During a two-hour laptop session, Carlos felt the back stay supportive without pushing his head forward. I also liked the smoother seat feel and the gradual, controlled recline—no sudden drop. The trade-offs were practical: you need a plan for power access, and how “easy” it is to live with depends on the cover you choose, especially if you tend to snack on the sofa.
What we liked
-
More wall-friendly recline behavior
-
Cooler seat feel than plush chenille
-
Easy to settle into for work-to-TV routines
Who it is best for
-
Smaller living rooms that still want power recline
-
People who run warm and want a cooler-feeling seat
Where it falls short
-
Needs power planning and basic cord discipline
-
Cover care varies and can require more attention than leather

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Space-saver room fit | Requires power access |
| Cooler seat feel | Fabric care depends on cover choice |
| Smooth, gradual recline | Not as “wipe-clean” as leather |

Details
-
Overall dimensions: 43" H x 92" W x 38.5" D
-
Model: S670RP4
-
Upholstery options: 700+ fabrics; top-grain leather choices available
-
Back cushion access: zipper-back design
-
Seat feel: Performa-Weave cushioning is described as cooler and more durable
-
Reclining: power space-saver configuration
-
Perceived cushion firmness: medium
-
Cooling / breathability: tends to feel cool
-
Support for different body sizes: good range; tall testers wanted a bit more upper-back height
-
Cleaning: routine fabric care and quicker spill cleanup
-
Pet-friendliness: moderate (depends on the fabric)
-
Durability: stable feel through repeated posture changes
-
Assembly: power connection plus final placement planning
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.6 | Power setup adds steps, but it’s manageable |
| Seat Comfort | 4.0 | Comfortable without feeling overly soft |
| Back Support | 3.9 | Supportive through long sessions, upright to recline |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Consistent fit across testers for everyday lounging |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.2 | Coolest-feeling seat surface in this group |
| Durability | 4.0 | Held steady through repeated posture shifts |
| Layout Practicality | 4.2 | Best room-fit practicality among the recliners here |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.9 | Easy to adjust posture; moving the sofa is still work |
| Cleaning | 3.6 | Fabric care matters, but it’s manageable with habits |
| Value | 3.9 | A strong blend of comfort, cooling, and room fit |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | The best small-room recline balance |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayne Park Sand Sofa | 3.7 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.6 |
| Treasure Trove Almond Sofa | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 3.8 |
| Tarrant Reclining Sofa | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 3.6 |
| Leya Power Space Saver Sofa | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.9 |
Treasure Trove scored best overall because it stayed steady across comfort, cooling, durability, and ease of movement. Leya’s clearest edge was cooling plus room-fit practicality. Jayne Park delivered pure lounge softness, but the deep seat and higher-cleaning effort pulled its score down. Tarrant was the best “session sofa” for reclining and built-in conveniences, though it needs more space and faster spill cleanup.
How to Choose a HomeGoods Sofa
Start with how you actually sit. Deep, soft seats reward sprawling but can feel awkward for shorter legs; recliners solve part of the depth issue by letting you change the angle. Next, match upholstery to your routine—wipeable surfaces handle kids, pets, and snacking better, while plush fabrics usually take more maintenance. For petite loungers who dislike deep seats, Treasure Trove was the most forgiving. For couples who want recline without overfilling the room, Leya made the best use of space. For sports and gaming setups where features matter, Tarrant is the clear pick.
Limitations
Across this lineup, the recurring trade-offs are size, heat management, and maintenance. Jayne Park is the toughest match for shorter legs and low-upkeep households. Tarrant needs recline clearance, which rules out tighter rooms. Leya requires power access and some cord discipline. Treasure Trove is the least “sink-in” option if you want an ultra-plush lounge feel.
HomeGoods Sofa Vs. Alternatives
-
Why you’d pick these models
-
You want comfort-first seating built for long, everyday sessions
-
You value recline and convenience features like integrated charging
-
You prefer a living-room-anchor silhouette over compact minimalism
-
-
Other options worth considering
-
Burrow Nomad Sofa: modular flexibility for frequent layout changes
-
La-Z-Boy reclining sofa lines: broad recline options with support-forward builds
-
Article Sven Sofa: cleaner modern styling with a firmer, more upright sit
-
Pro Tips for HomeGoods Sofa
-
Measure walking paths, not just wall width—recliners need clearance.
-
If you run warm, prioritize cooler-feeling upholstery and avoid plush pile fabrics for all-day use.
-
Add a small lumbar pillow early if you notice any forward slide during long movies.
-
Treat deep-seat sofas like lounge furniture: use a footrest or ottoman to reduce leg strain.
-
Keep a fabric brush or lint roller nearby if you choose velvet-like or chenille upholstery.
-
For recliners, plan outlet access and route cords away from foot traffic.
-
Wipe spills right away on mixed-material upholstery to prevent uneven wear.
-
Rotate loose cushions regularly to slow down body impressions.
-
If you host often, test the front edge—can guests sit upright without sinking?
FAQs
Which sofa felt easiest to keep clean day to day?
Treasure Trove was the easiest to keep clean day to day. Quick wipe-down cleanup handled spills and crumbs better than plush fabrics.
Which model worked best for small rooms?
Leya worked best in smaller rooms. The space-saver recline kept the main walkways more usable.
Which sofa was best for long gaming or sports sessions?
Tarrant was the best for long gaming or sports sessions. The recline, drop-down table, and charging kept everything within reach.
Which option is best if I’m shorter and dislike deep seats?
Treasure Trove was the most forgiving for shorter legs. Jayne Park’s deeper lounge seat pushed petite testers into a tucked-leg posture.