HomeGoods can be a good place to find a comfortable sofa at an off-price-store price, but its inventory changes constantly. This review focuses on four full-size models we were able to identify by their manufacturer numbers: two stationary Ashley sofas, one manual Ashley recliner, and a power reclining sofa from Best Home Furnishings. Treasure Trove was the easiest to live with, while Leya made the strongest case for reclining in a tighter room. Jayne Park offered the softest lounge seat, and Tarrant delivered the most useful built-ins. None is a compact apartment sofa, so the measurements and fit notes matter as much as comfort.
Table of Contents
- The Four Sofas at a Glance
- What Stood Out in Daily Use?
- How Do These Four Sofas Compare?
- How We Evaluated Each Sofa
- HomeGoods Sofa: Our Testing Experience
- Where Each Sofa Scored Best
- Which Sofa Fits Your Routine?
- What Should You Know Before Buying?
- How Do They Compare With Popular Alternatives?
- How to Get a Better Fit at Home
- FAQs
The Four Sofas at a Glance
| Sofa | Overall Score | Best Feature | Main Drawback | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayne Park Sand Sofa | 3.7/5 | Soft, deep seat | Warm fabric; very deep fit | Movie nights and taller loungers |
| Treasure Trove Almond Sofa | 4.0/5 | Easy cleanup and balanced support | Smooth leather felt slick to some testers | Busy, mixed-use living rooms |
| Tarrant Reclining Sofa | 3.8/5 | Manual recline, table, cup holders, and USB | Needs 13 inches behind it | Gaming, sports, and long TV sessions |
| Leya Power Space Saver Sofa | 3.9/5 | Power recline with a smaller wall footprint | Needs an outlet; fabric care varies | Rooms where a standard recliner will not fit |
What Stood Out in Daily Use?
Treasure Trove was the most versatile. Its 23-inch seat depth gave most testers enough room to relax without forcing shorter legs off the floor, and the mixed leather surface cleaned up faster than the three fabric sofas. Leya was the better recliner for a constrained floor plan because its mechanism stayed closer to the wall and moved in small, controllable steps. Jayne Park was the clear choice for softness, but its deep cushion encouraged legs-up lounging instead of upright work. Tarrant was the best equipped for long viewing sessions; its manual recliners, cup holders, drop-down table, and USB port were genuinely useful, though the sofa needs a dedicated location rather than a flexible layout.
How Do These Four Sofas Compare?
| Feature | Jayne Park | Treasure Trove | Tarrant | Leya |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Stationary | Stationary | Manual reclining | Power reclining, space-saver |
| Dimensions | 96" W x 43" D x 41" H | 93" W x 40" D x 40" H | 86" W x 40" D x 40" H | 92" W x 38.5" D x 43" H |
| Upholstery | Velvety fabric | Top-grain leather on contact areas; matched faux leather elsewhere | Polyester chenille | Fabric; S670RP4 is not the separate leather model |
| Cushions | Reversible seats and backs | Loose seats; attached back | Attached foam/poly-fiber cushions | Performa-Weave seat cushions; zipper-access backs |
| Seat fit | Deep; best with legs up | 23" deep; easiest fit for most testers | 22" deep; angle changes with recline | 21.5" deep; broad everyday fit |
| Back support | Soft; better with a lumbar pillow | Steady upright support | Strongest when reclined | Supportive upright and reclined |
| Heat | Warmest stationary sofa | Stayed relatively neutral | Chenille held heat | Coolest fabric seat here |
| Cleaning | Shows lint and pile marks | Fastest wipe-down | Blot spills promptly | Depends on the selected fabric |
| Room fit | Needs a large wall | Mid-to-large room | 13" wall clearance; 63" reclined length | Most wall-friendly recliner here |
How We Evaluated Each Sofa
We followed the same sofa evaluation process for every model: setup, repeated sit-and-stand cycles, laptop work, a two-hour movie, casual hosting, and stain cleanup. Measurements included usable seat depth, cushion compression, surface-temperature change, recliner clearance, and recovery after the seat was unloaded. We then rated assembly, seat comfort and back support, seat-depth fit, cooling, durability, layout, movement, cleaning, and value on a 5-point scale. The scores describe the tested sample and use conditions; manufacturer dimensions remain the reference for delivery planning.
HomeGoods Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Jayne Park Sand Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Jayne Park was comfortable as soon as we sat down, but it strongly favored a relaxed posture. Our sample measured 95.8 inches wide and 42.7 inches deep, close to the listed 96-by-43-inch footprint. With the back cushion in place, the usable seat depth was 25.5 inches. Carlos could plant his feet and lean back, while Mia had to tuck a leg under herself or add a lumbar pillow to avoid sliding forward during laptop work.
The seat compressed about 1.8 inches under a 180-pound tester and recovered roughly 90% of that height within five minutes. That softness made a two-hour movie easy on the hips, but quick posture changes took more effort than they did on Treasure Trove. The velvety surface also warmed by 4.8°F over the session and showed both lint and hand marks. Flipping the reversible seat and back cushions helped even out the visible wear.
What we liked
- The deepest, softest seat in the group gave taller users room to stretch out.
- Reversible seat and back cushions make it easier to spread wear across the sofa.
- The broad two-cushion layout worked well for naps and side-by-side movie watching.
Who it is best for
- Taller users and people who normally sit with their legs up.
- Larger TV rooms where softness matters more than an upright working posture.
Where it falls short
- The 25.5-inch usable depth pushed shorter testers away from the back cushion.
- The fabric retained more heat and showed more lint than the other stationary sofa.
- Its 96-inch width and bulky cushions make delivery and rearranging harder.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Soft, deep lounge seat | Too deep for some shorter users |
| Reversible seat and back cushions | Fabric holds heat |
| Excellent for naps and movies | Shows lint and pile marks |

Details
- Overall dimensions: 41" H x 96" W x 43" D
- Model: PC8150638
- Upholstery: velvety neutral fabric; chenille and slub-yarn accent pillows
- Cushions: reversible loose seats and backs; foam with poly-fiber wrap
- Seat feel: medium-plush
- Body fit: best for average-to-tall loungers; a lumbar pillow helped petite testers
- Cleaning: regular lint rolling and prompt spot treatment
- Pet use: hair clings to the pile, so this is not the lowest-maintenance choice
- Setup: simple after delivery, but the 185-pound frame is bulky to position

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.6 | Few setup steps, but hard to maneuver |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Softest long-session seat here |
| Back Support | 3.8 | Comfortable with added lumbar support |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.5 | Best for taller or legs-up sitting |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.3 | Velvety pile held noticeable heat |
| Durability | 3.8 | Reversible cushions distribute wear |
| Layout Practicality | 4.1 | Strong anchor for a large room |
| Movement | 3.6 | Deep cushion slows posture changes |
| Cleaning | 3.2 | Lint and pile marks need attention |
| Value | 3.7 | High comfort with added upkeep |
| Overall Score | 3.7 | Best for soft, deep lounging |
Treasure Trove Almond Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Treasure Trove felt more controlled than Jayne Park. We measured a 23-inch seat depth and a 22-inch seat height, which matched the listed dimensions and let more testers sit against the back without curling their legs. The cushion compressed 1.2 inches under the same 180-pound load and returned to 96% of its original height after five minutes. That firmer response gave Jenna a stable surface for laptop work and made the front edge easier for Marcus to use when standing up.
Movement traveled less across the bench than it did on the plush models: after 50 sit-and-stand cycles, the loose seat cushions had shifted less than a quarter inch. A small water-and-snack spill came off in two damp-cloth passes without a visible ring. The top-grain leather contact areas stayed close to room temperature during our two-hour session, although one tester found the smooth finish slippery when reclining in lightweight clothing. This is mixed upholstery, with matched faux leather on non-contact areas, not an all-leather sofa.
What we liked
- The 23-inch depth balanced upright support with enough room to relax.
- Spills and crumbs took less work to remove than they did on the fabric models.
- The firmer front edge made sitting down and standing up easier.
Who it is best for
- Households that use one sofa for working, hosting, snacking, and TV.
- Shoppers who want an easy-to-clean sofa without giving up a cushioned seat.
Where it falls short
- The seat does not have Jayne Park's immediate sink-in softness.
- The smooth contact surface felt slippery to testers wearing lighter fabrics.
- Leather appears only on contact areas; the remaining upholstery is matched faux leather.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Fast wipe-down cleaning | Smooth surface can feel slippery |
| Good upright and relaxed support | Less plush than Jayne Park |
| Stable front edge | Leather only on contact areas |

Details
- Overall dimensions: 40" H x 93" W x 40" D
- Model: 1930438
- Frame: corner-blocked and reinforced
- Cushions: attached back; loose high-resiliency foam seats with feather-fiber wrap
- Upholstery: top-grain leather on contact areas; matched faux leather elsewhere
- Seat dimensions: 23" deep x 22" high
- Seat feel: medium and supportive
- Cleaning: wipe spills promptly with a method suitable for mixed upholstery
- Pet use: hair lifts easily, but claws can mark the smooth surface
- Setup: standard positioning; easier with two people

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.7 | Typical setup; two people help |
| Seat Comfort | 4.1 | Comfortable without excessive sink |
| Back Support | 3.9 | Steady through long upright sits |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.9 | 23-inch depth fit most testers |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.1 | Held less heat than plush fabric |
| Durability | 4.2 | Frame and edge stayed stable |
| Layout Practicality | 3.9 | Large but not visually bulky |
| Movement | 3.8 | Easy to shift and stand up |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Fastest everyday cleanup |
| Value | 3.8 | Balanced comfort and maintenance |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Most versatile of the four |
Tarrant Reclining Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Tarrant worked best once we stopped treating it like a regular stationary sofa. The two outer seats recline manually, while the middle remains fixed and folds down into a table with two cup holders and USB charging. The pull tabs required about 10 pounds of force, and each footrest opened in roughly 1.5 seconds. The USB module needs the included power cord, but the recliners themselves do not.
At full extension, our sample reached 63 inches and needed the listed 13 inches of wall clearance. That extra space is easy to overlook in a showroom. During a three-hour sports night, Marcus used the center table for drinks and Jamal changed angles several times to relieve pressure behind his knees. The chenille surface rose 4.3°F over two hours, and a test spill required three blotting passes. After 100 open-and-close cycles, neither outside seat developed a new click or measurable side play.
What we liked
- The recline angle reduced pressure behind the knees during long viewing sessions.
- The drop-down table, cup holders, and USB port kept small items off the seat.
- The manual mechanisms remained steady after 100 cycles.
Who it is best for
- Home-theater, sports, and gaming rooms with a dedicated sofa wall.
- People who want adjustable leg support without paying for powered recline.
Where it falls short
- The 13-inch wall gap and 63-inch reclined length rule out tight walkways.
- Chenille held heat and needed faster spill care than Treasure Trove.
- At about 200 pounds, this is the least convenient sofa to reposition often.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Comfortable manual recline | Requires 13" wall clearance |
| Table, cup holders, and USB | Chenille runs warm |
| Stable mechanism in cycle testing | Heavy and hard to move |

Details
- Overall dimensions: 40" H x 86" W x 40" D
- Model: 9140589
- Reclining: dual manual recliners; stationary middle seat
- Clearance: 63" fully reclined length; 13" from the wall
- Frame: corner-blocked with a metal-reinforced seat
- Cushions: attached foam with poly-fiber wrap
- Upholstery: polyester chenille
- Features: drop-down table, two cup holders, and USB charging
- Cleaning: prompt blotting and fabric-safe spot care
- Setup: heavy handling; connect power only if using the USB port

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.4 | Simple mechanism, heavy frame |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Best during extended reclined use |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Support improves with recline |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.1 | Adjustable angle suits more bodies |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.4 | Chenille warmed during long sessions |
| Durability | 4.0 | Mechanisms stayed tight in cycling |
| Layout Practicality | 3.7 | Clearance limits room placement |
| Movement | 3.6 | Comfort adjusts; sofa is hard to move |
| Cleaning | 3.3 | Spills need immediate blotting |
| Value | 4.1 | Useful features at a manual-recline price |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | Best equipped for long viewing |
Leya Power Space Saver Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Leya was the easiest recliner to fit into a working living-room layout. The frame matched its listed 92-inch width and 38.5-inch depth, and the usable seat measured 21.5 inches deep. We placed it five inches from the wall and could still move from upright to our preferred TV angle without the back touching. The power control took about seven seconds to reach full extension and stopped cleanly at any point along the way.
Carlos worked on a laptop for two hours without the headrest pushing him forward, and the 20-inch seat height let shorter testers stand without rolling to the edge. The surface temperature rose only 2.4°F during that session, the smallest increase among the three fabric sofas. After 50 sit-and-stand cycles, the frame had moved 0.4 inch on hardwood and less than 0.2 inch on a rug. Fabric choice will affect stain resistance, so the exact swatch deserves more attention here than the showroom color. S670RP4 is the fabric power model; the leather version carries a separate code.
What we liked
- The space-saver path worked five inches from the wall in our preferred position.
- Power adjustment was smooth and easy to stop at a comfortable angle.
- The 21.5-inch depth and 20-inch height fit the widest range of testers among the recliners.
Who it is best for
- Smaller living rooms that still have space for a 92-inch power reclining sofa.
- People who change positions often or prefer a cooler-feeling fabric seat.
Where it falls short
- The sofa needs a nearby outlet and a safe cord route.
- Cleaning performance changes with the selected fabric, so swatch choice matters.
- Taller testers wanted more support above the shoulder blades.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Wall-friendly power recline | Requires an outlet |
| Cooler fabric seat | Care varies by fabric |
| Fits more body sizes | Upper back felt low to tall testers |

Details
- Overall dimensions: 43" H x 92" W x 38.5" D
- Model: S670RP4, fabric Power Space Saver
- Seat dimensions: 69" W x 21.5" D x 20" H
- Upholstery: customizable fabric; leather uses a separate model code
- Cushions: Performa-Weave seats; zipper-access backs
- Seat feel: medium with controlled cushioning
- Body fit: broad range; tall users may want more upper-back height
- Cleaning: follow the code for the selected fabric and blot spills promptly
- Setup: connect power, test the full path, and secure the cord away from traffic

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.6 | Power and cord setup add time |
| Seat Comfort | 4.0 | Cushioned without excessive sink |
| Back Support | 3.9 | Good through most recline angles |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | 21.5-inch depth suits more testers |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.2 | Coolest fabric surface here |
| Durability | 4.0 | Frame and mechanism stayed steady |
| Layout Practicality | 4.2 | Best recliner for wall clearance |
| Movement | 3.9 | Precise adjustment; heavy frame |
| Cleaning | 3.6 | Performance depends on the cover |
| Value | 3.9 | Strong comfort-to-footprint balance |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Best recliner for tighter layouts |
Where Each Sofa Scored Best
| Sofa | Overall | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling | Durability | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayne Park Sand Sofa | 3.7 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.6 |
| Treasure Trove Almond Sofa | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 3.8 |
| Tarrant Reclining Sofa | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 3.6 |
| Leya Power Space Saver Sofa | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.9 |
Treasure Trove earned the highest overall score because it had no major weak point: it was supportive, easy to clean, and comfortable for the broadest set of everyday tasks. Leya led in cooling and layout among the recliners. Jayne Park won on pure seat softness but lost ground on body fit and upkeep. Tarrant was more comfortable than its overall score suggests when fully reclined; clearance, heat, and cleaning lowered the total.
Which Sofa Fits Your Routine?
Begin with the product tag, not the showroom name. HomeGoods stock changes by store, and the same-looking sofa may have a different model number or cover. Compare that number with the dimensions before you buy. A room-fit check should include the doorway, stairs, walking path, and reclined footprint—not just the empty wall.
Then match the seat to your normal posture. Jayne Park suits people who stretch out or sit with their legs up. Treasure Trove is easier for upright work, guests, and shorter legs. Tarrant belongs in a dedicated media area with at least 13 inches behind it. Leya is the better recliner when wall clearance is limited, but it still occupies 92 inches of width and needs an outlet.
Finally, choose upholstery for the messes you actually have. Treasure Trove handled crumbs and liquid most easily, though its mix of real and faux leather needs suitable care. Jayne Park and Tarrant require more lint, hair, and spill attention. Leya offers more fabric choice, which is useful only if you check the cleaning code and abrasion rating of the exact swatch.
What Should You Know Before Buying?
Availability is the biggest limitation. HomeGoods describes its selection as ever-changing and does not provide a reliable online inventory for these model numbers. At the time of research, Jayne Park and Leya were listed through their manufacturers or dealers, while Treasure Trove and Tarrant had uneven stock across Ashley and independent sellers. Treat any in-store price as a one-location offer and compare the exact model before deciding.
The comfort results also come from one sample of each sofa and a short evaluation window. Fabric choice can change Leya's heat and cleaning performance, leather batches can feel slightly different, and long-term cushion wear requires more time than this test allowed. The measurements are useful for comparison, but delivery decisions should follow the current manufacturer's tag and your own doorway measurements.
How Do They Compare With Popular Alternatives?
Burrow Nomad: Nomad is the better option if you expect to move, carry the sofa through tight access points, or reconfigure the seating later. Its modular structure and more upright posture suit conversation and laptop work, but it generally costs more than the Ashley stationary sofas and does not provide the same soft, oversized feel as Jayne Park. Choose Nomad for adaptable ownership; choose Treasure Trove for easier wipe-down care or Jayne Park for deeper lounging.
La-Z-Boy reclining sofas: La-Z-Boy offers a much wider range of recline mechanisms, sizes, fabrics, and support options than Tarrant or Leya. That customization can produce a better body fit and adds choices such as power headrests or lumbar support, but it also raises the price and makes model selection more involved. Tarrant is the straightforward value pick for manual recline and built-ins, while Leya is the stronger choice when wall clearance is the main concern.
Article Sven: Sven has a cleaner mid-century shape, an 88-inch width, and a firmer, more upright presentation than these comfort-focused models. Its 24-inch seat depth still allows relaxed sitting, but the lower back and tufted bench feel different from Tarrant or Leya's high reclining backs. Sven makes more sense when modern styling is a priority; Treasure Trove is easier for mixed daily use, and Jayne Park is softer for long movie sessions.
How to Get a Better Fit at Home
- Measure the delivery path, doorway, and walking space as carefully as the wall.
- Photograph the product tag in the store so you can confirm the exact model and upholstery later.
- For a recliner, mark the upright and extended footprint on the floor with painter's tape.
- Spend at least 15 minutes in your usual posture; a quick showroom sit will not reveal a seat-depth mismatch.
- Bring a fabric swatch home when possible and check it in daylight, lamplight, and against pet hair.
- Use a small lumbar pillow on Jayne Park if the deep seat pulls your hips forward.
- Keep Tarrant's USB cord behind the frame and away from the moving mechanism.
- Blot spills instead of rubbing, and follow the cleaning code for the exact cover.
- Rotate Jayne Park's reversible cushions regularly and re-center Treasure Trove's loose seats.
FAQs
Which sofa was easiest to clean?
Treasure Trove. Its smooth contact surface released crumbs quickly, and our small spill disappeared after two damp-cloth passes. Use a cleaner approved for its mix of top-grain and faux leather.
Which model worked best in a smaller room?
Leya used wall space most efficiently among the recliners, but it is still 92 inches wide. It suits a room with limited recline clearance, not a genuinely tiny living room.
Which sofa was best for gaming or sports?
Tarrant. Its manual recliners supported longer sessions, while the drop-down table, cup holders, and USB charging kept remotes, drinks, and phones organized.
Which option fits shorter people best?
Treasure Trove was the easiest stationary fit because its 23-inch seat depth allowed more testers to reach the back and keep their feet stable. Leya was the better reclining fit with a 21.5-inch seat depth and 20-inch seat height.