The Hästens Excel is a handcrafted Swedish frame-bed built around a double-spring system and natural fibers. In our testing, it delivered a buoyant, breathable feel instead of the slow sink you get from dense foam. It is still a premium purchase, and pricing can vary a lot depending on size, firmness, topper choice, and retailer.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hästens Excel | 4.5/5 | Breathable, spring-forward feel; strong support; natural-material build | Expensive; noticeable bounce; lighter contouring than foam | Hot sleepers; combo sleepers; couples who like responsiveness |
Final Verdict
In our hands-on testing, Excel felt plush at the surface but disciplined underneath. I could move from my back to my side without losing alignment, and the bed stayed dry and airy instead of turning warm and stuffy. The trade-off is clear: motion is damped, not erased, and comfort depends a lot on choosing the right firmness.
-
Who It’s For
-
Combination sleepers who rotate positions often
-
People who want a responsive, on-the-surface feel
-
Hot sleepers who dislike heat-hugging foams
-
-
Who It’s Not For
-
Anyone who needs near-silent, foam-like motion isolation
-
Shoppers with a strict midrange budget
-
People who want deep contouring at the shoulders and hips
-

How We Tested

Our hands-on testing focused on support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability. I slept on the bed for several weeks and tracked how it felt from night to night, then brought in Marcus for heat and edge checks while Jenna and Ethan handled partner-movement drills. We used repeatable routines: alignment checks, timed cool-down notes, position-based pressure mapping, ease-of-turn testing, edge sit and sleep checks, and a close look at build quality.
Our Testing Experience
The first thing I noticed was how easy the surface was to use. It never had that stuck-in-foam feeling; I could settle in, roll over, and get comfortable again without fighting the bed. On my back, my hips stayed level. On my side, the top took the edge off pressure without turning mushy. Marcus kept calling the bed “dry” during his hot-sleeper sessions, which matched what I felt. Jenna and Ethan still noticed movement in couple tests, but the bounce felt controlled rather than messy.
-
What we liked
-
Fast movement without losing support
-
Consistent temperature neutrality from night to night
-
Secure edges for sitting and sleeping near the perimeter
-
-
Who it is best for
-
Back and combination sleepers who want buoyant support
-
Hot sleepers who run warm on foam-heavy beds
-
Couples who prefer easy movement over a dead-still surface
-
-
Where it falls short
-
Motion isolation is good for springs, but not foam-level
-
Side sleepers wanting a deeper hug may need a softer build
-
The overall setup is tall and heavy enough to feel like a long-term fixture
-

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Breathable feel; quick response; steady support; secure edges | Expensive; some bounce; lighter contouring than memory foam; tall, heavy setup |
Details
-
Pricing varies significantly by size, firmness, topper choice, and retailer.
-
Firmness options commonly listed: soft, medium, firm, and extra firm; split firmness is available on wider builds.
-
Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, and California King are commonly listed, and some sellers also note custom sizing.
-
Construction centers on a double-spring design with both pocket and Bonnell systems.
-
Edge structure includes reinforced corner springs and reinforced edge springs for a more stable perimeter.
-
Core materials repeatedly referenced for the build include horsetail hair, wool, cotton, and flax.
-
Flax layers are described as helping reduce rubbing noise and discharge static.
-
The frame is described as solid, slow-growing Swedish pine.
-
The build uses many layered comfort and support components rather than a simple foam-over-coil stack.
-
This is a tall, heavy frame-bed system that makes the most sense as a dedicated primary-bed setup.
-
Warranty references consistently point to 25-year coverage on the frame and springs.

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.7 | Kept hips level through position changes and stayed stable under load. |
| Cooling | 4.6 | Delivered a breathable, fiber-forward feel that rarely held onto heat. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Plush at the surface, but not a deep cradle around sharper shoulders. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8 | Damped for a spring system, but partner movement still comes through. |
| Responsiveness | 4.7 | Fast rebound made turning simple and predictable. |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | The reinforced perimeter felt secure for sitting and edge sleep. |
| Durability | 4.8 | The heavy-duty build and long warranty both suggest strong staying power. |
| Overall | 4.5 | A strong all-rounder with standout support and cooling. |
Choosing Guide
Choose Excel if you want a responsive, spring-led bed with natural materials and good temperature control. In our testing, medium and firmer feels made the most sense for heavier sleepers or anyone who needs steadier lower-back support, while lighter side sleepers will usually want the softer end of the range. Couples who value easy repositioning should like it more than sleepers who want a very still surface. For context, it also makes sense to compare it with a handcrafted luxury option from Vispring or a more familiar mainstream innerspring like the Saatva Classic.
Limitations

Excel is expensive, and its spring energy is part of the package. That is great for mobility, but it is not ideal if you want foam-level stillness. Side sleepers who want deep contouring may find the feel more buoyant than cradling unless they go softer. It is also a substantial frame-bed system, so it fits best in a room where the setup is likely to stay put.
Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose Excel
-
Breathable, natural-material build with a fast, responsive feel
-
Strong support that stays consistent through position changes
-
Reinforced edge structure that feels secure at the perimeter
-
-
Alternatives to consider
-
A Vispring model if you want a similarly handcrafted luxury feel with a different comfort signature
-
Saatva Classic if you want a more mainstream innerspring feel at a lower entry point
-
Royal-Pedic Premier line if you want a traditional luxury build and a steadier surface feel
-
Pro Tips
-
Pick firmness based on your dominant sleep position and body weight, not just a vague soft-versus-firm preference.
-
Give your body about two weeks before making a final comfort call.
-
Use breathable bedding so the bed’s airflow advantages are not muted.
-
Keep any protector thin; thick pads can dull the responsiveness you are paying for.
-
Rotate your sleep orientation periodically early on so the surface wears more evenly.
-
If two sleepers need different feels, look into split firmness on larger sizes.
-
Test the edge while sitting down; a good perimeter should feel stable, not collapsible.
-
Keep room temperature steady; Excel feels temperature-neutral, not actively cold.
-
Treat it like a long-term setup rather than a bed you plan to move often.
-
If comfort feels off, check topper and bedding choices before blaming the support core.
FAQs
Does the Hästens Excel Mattress sleep cool?
In our testing, it stayed temperature-neutral with a dry, airy feel. Marcus, our hottest sleeper on the team, noticed less heat buildup than he usually gets from foam-heavy beds.
Is the feel more “bouncy” or “huggy”?
More bouncy. It responds quickly and keeps you more on the surface than deep in it.
Will I feel my partner move?
Some transfer shows up because it is a spring-led design, though it is more controlled than many traditional innersprings. Very light sleepers may still notice movement.
Which firmness works best for combination sleepers?
Most combination sleepers should start around medium to firm because those feels kept hips supported during position changes while still giving some surface plushness.
Is it easy to turn and change positions?
Yes. In our testing, the rebound made turning simple and predictable.