Limited-Time Deals | 100-Night Home Trial | Fast U.S. Shipping | 10-Year Warranty

Your cart

Your cart is empty

Explore our range of products

We receive free products to review and participate in affiliate programs, where we are compensated for items purchased through links from our site. See our disclosure page for more information.

Airpedic 700 Mattress Reviews (2026)

Airpedic 700 Mattress Reviews (2026)

The Airpedic 700 pairs a plush memory-foam surface with a multi-zone air system that lets you adjust support under different areas of the body. It was most comfortable after we firmed up the center zone for better lower-back alignment while leaving the upper zone softer for the shoulders. That combination makes it a strong adjustable mattress for couples and back-to-side sleepers, though the edge is not as steady as the perimeter of a well-built hybrid.

Table of Contents

Airpedic 700 at a Glance

Mattress Overall Score Pros Cons Best For
Airpedic 700 4.0/5 Targeted zone control, plush pressure relief, adjustable lumbar support Soft edge, slower foam response, some setup trial and error Couples with different preferences; back-to-side sleepers

Is the Airpedic 700 Worth It?

The Airpedic 700 is worth considering if you want a soft mattress but need more control under your lower back than a fixed-feel bed can provide. Raising the center zone improved alignment without taking away the cushioning around the shoulders and hips. That balance produced the best pressure relief and support in our trial. The compromise is a less stable edge, especially when sitting down or standing up from the bed.

  • Who it is for

  • Who should skip it

    • People who want one fixed setting with no adjustment period
    • Anyone who relies on a firm edge when sitting or getting out of bed
    • Shoppers who prefer the quick rebound and sturdier perimeter of a hybrid
Airpedic 700 Mattress

How We Evaluated the Airpedic 700

We slept on the Airpedic 700 for 14 nights and measured the sample at 12.1 inches tall after it had fully settled. Following our mattress testing process, we tracked overnight comfort, morning back tightness, heat buildup, partner disturbance, and how often we needed to change the settings. We rated support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability on a 5-point scale.

Our Testing Experience

Our first setup felt too soft through the middle. On our 10-point firmness scale, the surface felt close to 5.5/10, and our hips settled lower than our ribs while back sleeping. Firming the center zone brought the support under the midsection closer to 6.5/10 while the shoulder area stayed plush. The change was easy to feel: the spine stayed more level, yet the upper surface still had enough give for side sleeping.

Airpedic 700 Mattress

Temperature control was good for a plush foam bed, but not exceptional. The surface rose from 72.6°F to 79.4°F after 30 minutes of contact and cooled to 74.2°F ten minutes after we got up. Motion was similarly well controlled during ordinary position changes. In three drops with a 15-pound ball from 6 inches, vibration at a sensor 24 inches away lasted an average of 0.62 seconds. Larger movements still produced a light ripple through the air system.

The edge was the clearest weak point. Under the same 200-pound load, the edge compressed 4.0 inches compared with 2.7 inches at the center. Sleeping near the side felt secure enough, but sitting there or using it for leverage made the difference obvious. The plush foam also recovered more slowly than a spring-forward hybrid when we rolled from side to back.

  • What we liked

    • The center zone added lumbar support without making the shoulder area feel hard
    • Pressure relief stayed consistent once the zones were set
    • Each partner can adjust a Queen or larger model without forcing the same feel on both sides
  • Who it is best for

  • Where it falls short

    • The perimeter compresses noticeably while sitting
    • Finding repeatable settings takes several nights
    • The memory foam does not rebound as quickly as a responsive hybrid
Airpedic 700 Mattress

What Works and What Doesn't

Pros Cons
Three zones per side make it easier to fine-tune lumbar support The edge is softer than the perimeter of many premium hybrids
Five inches of comfort material provide plush cushioning and strong pressure relief The gel-infused foam still holds some warmth during longer use
Queen and larger sizes let partners personalize their own side It takes a few nights to settle on reliable settings

Key Specs and Policies

  • Mattress type: Adjustable-firmness air mattress with memory-foam comfort layers.
  • Total height: 12 inches.
  • Comfort layers: Two layers totaling 5 inches.
  • Feel: Plush surface with adjustable underlying support; see our firmness guide for scale context.
  • Zone system: Three air zones per side, or six chambers across Queen and larger models.
  • Firmness control: A broad range of fine adjustments through digital remotes.
  • Price: Varies by size and promotion.
  • Sizes shown: Twin XL, Queen, King, California King, and Split California King.
  • Shipping and setup: Estimated delivery is 2–3 weeks; the mattress arrives pre-assembled.
  • Sleep trial: 120 nights for qualifying direct purchases. The policy requires at least 30 nights, one comfort enhancement, and an approved RMA; return freight is not refundable. Review the practical differences among mattress trials before buying.
  • Warranty: 20-year limited coverage, prorated after the first two years. Our mattress warranty guide explains what that structure means.
  • Adjustable-base compatibility: Designed to work with adjustable bases.
  • Made in: USA.
Airpedic 700 Mattress

How the Airpedic 700 Scored

Metric Score What We Found
Support 4.5/5 Independent zone control kept the hips and lower back better aligned.
Cooling 4.0/5 The gel-infused foam limited heat buildup, though the plush surface was not temperature-neutral all night.
Pressure Relief 4.3/5 The soft upper layers cushioned the shoulder and hip without leaving the center unsupported.
Motion Isolation 4.0/5 Routine movement stayed localized, while larger shifts produced a mild ripple.
Responsiveness 3.8/5 The thick foam comfort system made turns slower than they feel on most hybrids.
Edge Support 3.7/5 The side held up while lying down but compressed noticeably under a seated load.
Durability 4.0/5 The chamber, foam, and perimeter components remained stable during the 14-night test, with no new noise or visible height loss.
Overall 4.0/5 A capable choice for sleepers who value zone control more than a firm edge or quick foam response.

Who Should Buy the Airpedic 700?

The Airpedic 700 makes the most sense if you want the cushioning associated with a soft mattress but need firmer support under the waist or hips. It lets you raise the lumbar area without hardening the entire sleep surface. Couples gain the most from that flexibility because each partner can tune a Queen or larger model independently. Plan to make small changes over several nights; this is not a mattress that always feels right at the first setting.

If you want more automation and sleep data, the Sleep Number i8 has a more developed smart-bed ecosystem. The Saatva Solaire is the stronger fit for white-glove service and a luxury mix of latex, foam, and adjustable air. The iSense Hybrid Premier is better suited to shoppers who want adjustable firmness without giving up the support and rebound of pocketed coils.

Airpedic 700 Mattress

What to Consider Before Buying

The edge is the main drawback. It is adequate for sleeping near the side, but frequent edge sitting or pushing off exposes more compression than you get from a reinforced hybrid. The plush foam also slows down position changes, and the multi-zone controls require patience. If you want a firm perimeter, fast rebound, or a mattress that needs no fine-tuning, the Airpedic 700 is a poor match.

How It Compares With Other Adjustable Mattresses

Airpedic 700: Choose this model when separate lumbar control matters more than smart tracking. Its three-zone design can firm the middle of the body while leaving the shoulders and legs softer, a level of regional control the other options do not match in the same way. Its weaknesses are the softer perimeter and the patience required to learn the controls.

Sleep Number i8: The i8 is easier to recommend to shoppers who want automatic adjustments, app-based control, and sleep data in one established system. The Airpedic offers more direct control by body zone, while the i8 focuses on whole-side firmness and connected features.

Saatva Solaire: The Solaire has a more traditional luxury presentation, including premium comfort materials and in-room setup. Its 50 firmness settings provide precise whole-side adjustment, but the Airpedic is the better choice if you specifically want a separate lumbar zone.

iSense Hybrid Premier: The iSense combines adjustable air components with foam and pocketed coils, so it feels more responsive and secure around the edge than a typical adjustable airbed. Pick it over the Airpedic if you want hybrid bounce; pick the Airpedic if targeted midsection control is the priority.

Tips for Finding the Right Setting

  • Start with spinal alignment: firm the center zone before changing the entire side.
  • Make one small adjustment per night so you can tell what helped.
  • Side sleepers should soften the shoulder zone before lowering overall support.
  • Back sleepers should raise midsection support before increasing firmness elsewhere.
  • Set each side independently instead of trying to match your partner's numbers.
  • Give your body two or three nights to adapt after a larger change.
  • Keep pillow height consistent while adjusting the bed because it also affects alignment.
  • Save or record a successful setting before experimenting further.

FAQs

Does the Airpedic 700 feel like a traditional air mattress?

No. Its five-inch comfort system creates a cushioned mattress surface rather than the taut feel of a temporary air bed. The difference is that support underneath the foam can be adjusted by zone.

How long did it take to find the right settings?

Several nights. Small nightly changes made it easier to identify the setting that improved alignment without taking away shoulder cushioning.

Is it good for couples who wake each other up?

Yes, for most couples. Routine position changes stayed fairly contained, although larger movements sent a mild ripple across the surface. Its motion isolation is good rather than exceptional.

What's the biggest day-to-day downside?

The soft edge. Lying near it was comfortable, but sitting there or using it to stand up felt less secure than it would on a reinforced hybrid.

Previous post
Next post
Back to Mattress Reviews

Our Testing Team

Chris Miller

Lead Tester

Chris oversees the full testing pipeline for mattresses, sofas, and other home products. He coordinates the team, designs scoring frameworks, and lives with every product long enough to feel real strengths and weaknesses. His combination-sleeping and mixed lounging habits keep him focused on long-term comfort and support.

Marcus Reed

Heavyweight Sofa & Mattress Tester

Marcus brings a heavier build and heat-sensitive profile into every test. He pushes deep cushions, edges, and frames harder than most users. His feedback highlights whether a design holds up under load, runs hot, or collapses into a hammock-like slump during long gaming or streaming sessions.

Carlos Alvarez

Posture & Work-From-Home Specialist

Carlos spends long hours working from sofas and beds with a laptop. He tracks how mid-back, neck, and lumbar regions respond to different setups. His notes reveal whether a product keeps posture neutral during extended sitting or lying, and whether small adjustments still feel stable and controlled.

Mia Chen

Petite Side-Sleeper & Lounger

Mia tests how mattresses and sofas treat a smaller frame during side sleeping and curled-up lounging. She feels pressure and seat-depth problems very quickly. Her feedback exposes designs that swallow shorter users, leave feet dangling, or create sharp pressure points at shoulders, hips, and knees.

Jenna Brooks

Couple Comfort & Motion Tester

Jenna evaluates how well sofas and mattresses handle real shared use with a partner. She tracks motion transfer, usable width, and edge comfort when two adults spread out. Her comments highlight whether a product supports relaxed couple lounging, easy repositioning, and quiet nights without constant disturbance.

Jamal Davis

Tall, Active-Body Tester

Jamal brings a tall, athletic frame and post-workout soreness into the lab. He checks seat depth, leg support, and surface responsiveness on every product. His notes show whether cushions bounce back, frames feel solid under long legs, and sleep surfaces support joints during recovery stretches and naps.

Ethan Cole

Restless Lounger & Partner Tester

Ethan acts as the moving partner in many couple-focused tests. He shifts positions frequently and pays attention to how easily a surface lets him turn, slide, or return after short breaks. His feedback exposes cushions that feel too squishy, too sticky, or poorly shaped for real-world lounging patterns.