Living Spaces spans everything from budget chaise sofas to feature-packed power recliners. We tested four popular picks through everyday routines—movie nights, laptop work, gaming, and quick naps—and scored them for comfort, support, cooling, cleaning, durability, and value. The trade-off is simple: entry models tend to feel firmer and more straightforward, while the power recliner leans hard into comfort and convenience but demands more space and is tougher to move. If you want more context on how we evaluate seating and what to look for, the Sofa Resource Hub pairs well with our sofa buying guide, sofa reviews, and a browsable sofa collection.
Table of Contents
- Product Overview
- Testing Team Takeaways
- Living Spaces Sofa Comparison Chart
- How We Tested These Sofas
- Living Spaces Sofa: Our Testing Experience
- Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
- How Do You Choose a Living Spaces Sofa?
- Limitations
- Living Spaces Sofas vs. Alternatives
- Pro Tips for Living Spaces Sofas
- FAQs
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stark | 4.0 | Strong value, reversible chaise, easy setup | Firm feel, moderate back support | First apartment, small family room | $395 |
| Cozy | 3.9 | Plush lounge feel, reversible chaise, removable cover | Very deep sit, slower repositioning | Loungers, casual hosting | $695 |
| Santana | 3.9 | Clean modern look, balanced sit, compact footprint | Velvet upkeep, average cooling | Style-forward living rooms | $550 |
| Charter | 4.2 | Power recline, headrest adjust, tray + USB convenience | Heavy, needs power planning | Movie-night households, comfort-first buyers | $2,495 |
Testing Team Takeaways
The four sofas fell into clear lanes. Stark and Santana are the straightforward options: fast to set up, easy to place, and most comfortable if you prefer a firmer, more upright sit.
Cozy is the lounge choice—it’s the one we ended up sinking into when we didn’t care about perfect posture. Charter is the feature leader. When we wanted a true recline-and-stay-put seat, it delivered, but it also required the most planning around placement, power access, and sheer weight.
Living Spaces Sofa Comparison Chart
| Item | Stark | Cozy | Santana | Charter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall dimensions | 80"W x 62"D x 37"H | 84"W x 64"D x 35"H | 78"W x 38.5"D x 37"H | 91"W x 39"D x 41.34"H |
| Seat depth | 20.47 in | 51.18 in | 22.0 in | 22.0 in |
| Seat height | 19.68 in | 21.65 in | 19.5 in | 20.47 in |
| Upholstery | Fabric; 100% polyester | Fabric/linen; 100% polyester | Velvet; 100% polyester | 100% top grain where body touches + leather match; leather/faux leather mix |
| Cushion build | Seat: foam with Dacron wrap; back: blown-in fiber | Seat: foam core in down-alternative bag; back: blown-in fiber | Seat: foam with Dacron wrap; back: blown-in fiber | Seat/back: foam with Dacron wrap |
| Frame & suspension | Frame: kiln-dried solid hardwood + engineered wood + MDF mix; 8-gauge sinuous steel coil with cross wires | Frame: kiln-dried solid hardwood + engineered wood mix; 8-gauge sinuous steel coil | Frame: kiln-dried solid hardwood + engineered wood mix; 8-gauge sinuous steel coil | Frame: kiln-dried solid hardwood + plywood; 8-gauge sinuous steel coil |
| Comfort level | Firm | Plush | - | - |
| Weight capacity per seat | 250 lbs | 300 lbs | 275 lbs | 350 lbs |
| Cleaning code | SW | W | W | Leather care guidance listed |
| Assembly (typical) | Attach legs; ~15 minutes | Attach legs; ~15 minutes | Attach legs; ~15 minutes | Power recline; heavy placement; wall clearance to recline 5.5 in |
| Standout functional features | Reversible chaise | Reversible orientation; removable cover (not machine washable) | Modern velvet styling | Power zero gravity recline, adjustable headrests, tray, cupholders, USB |
How We Tested These Sofas
We rotated these sofas through real routines—two-hour movie blocks, laptop work sessions, gaming, and short naps—so the scores reflected daily use instead of a quick showroom sit. This follows our How We Tested Sofas rubric.
To keep comparisons fair, we ran the same checks on each model: assembly and setup friction, cooling and breathability during long sits, comfort and ergonomics (seat feel, back support, and seat-depth fit), sofa durability signals (edge sit-stand cycles and cushion settling), ease of movement and repositioning, size and layout practicality, fabric and cleaning, and overall value.
Living Spaces Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Stark
Our Testing Experience
We started with Stark because it’s the kind of sofa you buy when you want the room usable fast. Over a week, Marcus and Mia and I put it through sports nights, laptop work, and a few accidental naps.
The seat is firm and stays upright, which made it easier to work or watch TV without sliding forward. The chaise is what turns it into a true lounge spot; without it, the seat depth feels more “sit” than “sink.”
What we liked
-
A firm, upright seat that stays supportive for TV and laptop sessions
-
Reversible chaise that lets you flip the layout when the room changes
-
Straightforward day-to-day cleanup for normal household mess
Who it is best for
-
Budget shoppers who still want a chaise-style setup
-
People who prefer an upright sit for work, gaming, or TV
-
Rooms where left/right flexibility matters
Where it falls short
-
Not the right pick if you want a soft, sink-in lounge feel
-
Back support can benefit from an extra pillow during long movies
-
If you love extra-deep seating, it may feel shallow
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong entry-level value for a reversible chaise setup | Firm feel won’t work for everyone |
| Easy-to-fit layout thanks to the reversible chaise | Back support is moderate for long reclines |
| Quick leg-attach setup with minimal fuss | Not a deep-seat lounge sofa |
Details
-
Price: $395
-
Dimensions: 80"W x 62"D x 37"H
-
Seat depth: 20.47 in
-
Seat height: 19.68 in
-
Weight: 122.4 lbs
-
Configuration: sofa chaise; reversible orientation
-
Upholstery: fabric; base cloth content 100% polyester
-
Seat cushion: foam with Dacron wrap (loose reversible cushion)
-
Back cushion: blown-in fiber (loose cushion)
-
Weight capacity per seat: 250 lbs
-
Comfort level: firm
-
Fabric care code: SW
-
Assembly: attach legs; ~15 minutes
-
Minimum doorway clearance (unboxed): 28.0 in
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Simple leg-attach process and predictable placement |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.5 | Polyester fabric felt average during long sits |
| Seat Comfort | 3.6 | Firm comfort works best for upright sitting |
| Back Support | 3.4 | Needed pillows/positioning for movie-length lounging |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.5 | Works for average builds; not a deep-seat sofa |
| Durability | 3.6 | Felt stable under edge use; value-grade construction feel |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Easy to reorient thanks to reversible chaise |
| Cleaning | 4.2 | Daily mess cleanup felt straightforward with SW code |
| Layout Practicality | 4.4 | Chaise flexibility makes it easy to fit most rooms |
| Value | 4.8 | Pricing-to-function ratio is the headline |
| Overall | 4.0 | The practical buy: firm, flexible, and hard to beat on cost |
Cozy
Our Testing Experience
Cozy was our default “sit down for a minute” sofa. I tested it with Jenna, Ethan, and Carlos because the whole point of this model is shared lounging.
The seat is exceptionally deep. For taller loungers it felt indulgent, while smaller frames generally needed a throw pillow behind the back to keep a comfortable bend at the knees. The upside is that it absorbs shifting and stretching better than most plush options.
What we liked
-
A lounge-first feel that makes it easy to settle in for longer sessions
-
Reversible chaise that helps with traffic flow and casual hosting
-
Removable cover that supports routine upkeep (even though it is not machine washable)
Who it is best for
-
People who sprawl, curl up, and nap on the sofa
-
Couples or roommates who like sharing a chaise setup
-
Casual rooms where comfort matters more than a formal sit
Where it falls short
-
The depth can overwhelm petite users without extra pillows
-
Plush seating slows quick posture changes
-
Not ideal if you need a crisp, upright “desk on the sofa” posture
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Plush comfort that encourages relaxed lounging | Very deep seat can be a lot for smaller frames |
| Reversible chaise orientation is genuinely useful | Plush feel can make repositioning slower |
| Removable cover supports day-to-day maintenance habits | Not the best for strict upright posture |
Details
-
Price: $695 (was $795)
-
Dimensions: 84"W x 64"D x 35"H
-
Seat depth: 51.18 in
-
Seat height: 21.65 in
-
Weight: 176.4 lbs
-
Configuration: reversible sofa chaise; orientation reversible
-
Upholstery: fabric/linen; base cloth content 100% polyester
-
Removable cover: yes; machine washable cover: no
-
Foam density: 1.8
-
Frame composition: kiln-dried solid hardwood + engineered wood mixed
-
Suspension system: 8-gauge sinuous steel coil with cross wires
-
Seat cushion: foam core encased in down-alternative filled bag
-
Back cushion: blown-in fiber
-
Weight capacity per seat: 300 lbs
-
Comfort level: plush
-
Fabric care code: W
-
Assembly: attach legs; ~15 minutes
-
Minimum doorway clearance (unboxed): 29.0 in
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.5 | Straightforward leg attachment and stable stance |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.8 | Stayed comfortable longer than expected for plush seating |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | The best “sink in and stay” feel of the four |
| Back Support | 3.6 | Better with a small lumbar pillow during long viewing |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.2 | Depth favors loungers; smaller frames needed support behind them |
| Durability | 3.8 | Foam density and frame felt solid, but plush feel will show use |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.4 | Plush seat makes quick posture changes slower |
| Cleaning | 3.6 | W code is workable; removable cover helps routine upkeep |
| Layout Practicality | 4.5 | Reversible chaise is genuinely useful in real rooms |
| Value | 4.1 | Strong comfort-per-dollar for a lounge-focused chaise sofa |
| Overall | 3.9 | The lounge pick: cozy, plush, and best for relaxed living |
Santana
Our Testing Experience
Santana was our “design-forward daily driver” test. Mia and Jamal joined so we could see how it handled different body types and sitting habits.
It has a balanced, centered feel that worked for laptop work and TV. The velvet is smooth against bare arms, but it also shows pressure marks and benefits from more routine upkeep than a flat weave.
What we liked
-
A clean, modern profile that reads lighter than many chaise setups
-
Balanced seat feel that works for upright sitting and relaxed evenings
-
Easy placement in smaller rooms thanks to the compact footprint
Who it is best for
-
Style-first shoppers who still want everyday comfort
-
Smaller living rooms that can’t take an oversized chaise
-
People who bounce between work-on-the-sofa and TV time
Where it falls short
-
Velvet requires more ongoing maintenance and shows marks
-
Cooling is average during long sessions
-
Not the best choice if you want an extra-deep lounge seat
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Modern velvet styling with a compact footprint | Velvet shows marks and needs more upkeep |
| Comfort works across mixed postures | Cooling is average for hot sitters |
| Straightforward assembly and manageable weight | Not a deep-seat lounge sofa |
Details
-
Price: $550 (was $595)
-
Dimensions: 78"W x 38.5"D x 37"H
-
Seat depth: 22.0 in
-
Seat height: 19.5 in
-
Weight: 90 lbs
-
Upholstery: fabric/velvet; base cloth content 100% polyester
-
Frame composition: kiln-dried solid hardwood + engineered wood mixed
-
Wood species: alder
-
Suspension system: 8-gauge sinuous steel coil with cross wires
-
Seat cushion: foam with Dacron wrap; loose reversible cushions
-
Back cushion: blown-in fiber; loose reversible
-
Foam density: 1.8
-
Weight capacity per seat: 275 lbs
-
Fabric care code: W
-
Assembly: attach legs; ~15 minutes
-
Minimum doorway clearance (unboxed): 27.0 in
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.5 | Quick leg attachment and manageable weight |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.4 | Velvet felt warmer during longer sits |
| Seat Comfort | 3.8 | Balanced feel that works for mixed-use evenings |
| Back Support | 3.7 | Comfortable with posture changes; not a tall-back lounge |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.7 | Works for most; tall loungers may want deeper seating |
| Durability | 3.7 | Solid core build; velvet will show everyday wear cues |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.1 | Lighter sofa made room tweaks easier |
| Cleaning | 3.7 | W code helps, but velvet upkeep is more hands-on |
| Layout Practicality | 3.8 | Standard sofa footprint fits more rooms than chaise styles |
| Value | 4.4 | Strong style-per-dollar at this price point |
| Overall | 3.9 | The “daily driver” sofa: stylish, balanced, and easy to place |
Charter
Our Testing Experience
Charter was the sofa we treated like dedicated movie seating. I tested it with Marcus and Carlos, then brought Jenna in for a shared evening because the features change how the sofa gets used.
The power recline and adjustable headrest let us fine-tune posture instead of committing to one angle. The drop-down tray, cupholders, and USB ports reduced side-table clutter, but the trade-off is weight and the need to plan around outlets and recline clearance.
What we liked
-
Power zero-gravity recline paired with adjustable headrest support
-
Built-in tray, cupholders, and USB ports that suit long viewing sessions
-
Leather surface that wipes down easily after everyday spills
Who it is best for
-
Movie-night households who want a comfort-first main seat
-
Anyone who needs head and neck support during long streaming blocks
-
Hosts who like built-in convenience for snacks and devices
Where it falls short
-
Heavy and not friendly to frequent rearranging
-
Requires outlet planning and a bit of wall clearance to recline
-
Premium price compared with simpler sofas
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Power recline and adjustable headrests | Heavy and difficult to move |
| Tray, cupholders, and USB ports add day-to-day convenience | Needs power and placement planning |
| Top-grain leather where the body touches | Premium pricing |
Details
-
Price: $2,495
-
Product features: power zero gravity reclining; drop-down tray table; cupholders; USB ports; adjustable headrests
-
Dimensions: 91"W x 39"D x 41.34"H
-
Seat depth: 22.0 in
-
Seat height: 20.47 in
-
Length open: 65.75 in
-
Weight: 302 lbs
-
Upholstery: 100% top grain where body touches; leather match listed; leather/faux leather materials
-
Wood species: pine
-
Frame composition: kiln-dried solid hardwood and plywood
-
Suspension system: 8-gauge sinuous steel coil with cross wires
-
Foam density: 2.2
-
Seat cushion: foam with Dacron wrap; attached cushions
-
Reclining function: yes; wall clearance needed to recline 5.5 in
-
USB power port(s): yes
-
Weight capacity per seat: 350 lbs
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.8 | Minimal assembly, but heavy placement and power setup matters |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.9 | Leather felt comfortable; temperature depends on room conditions |
| Seat Comfort | 4.8 | The most consistently comfortable seat across long sessions |
| Back Support | 4.7 | Adjustable headrest made support more customizable |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.4 | Works upright, and recline expands usable comfort range |
| Durability | 4.8 | High foam density and robust frame feel premium in daily use |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.4 | Weight and power design discourage frequent rearranging |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Wipe-down convenience is a real advantage for spills |
| Layout Practicality | 3.8 | Requires power/outlet planning and recline clearance |
| Value | 4.1 | Expensive, but the feature set and build justify it for the right buyer |
| Overall | 4.2 | The comfort-and-features leader, best when the sofa is your main seat |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stark | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 4.2 |
| Cozy | 3.9 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.4 |
| Santana | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 4.1 |
| Charter | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 4.8 | 3.4 |
The score spread is straightforward. Charter leads on comfort and support, but it loses points on movement because it’s built to stay put. Cozy is the best pure lounger, and its seat-depth score is the main caveat for smaller frames. Stark and Santana are the practical picks: efficient, easy to live with, and cost-conscious, with Stark winning on value and Santana feeling easiest to place in tighter rooms. If you are building a bigger shortlist, start with best home theater sofas, best reclining sofas, and best apartment sofas.
How Do You Choose a Living Spaces Sofa?
Start with how you actually sit, then confirm the fit. If you spend time upright for laptop work, a firmer, more manageable seat depth tends to feel better—Stark and Santana kept us more naturally aligned. Before you commit, review How to measure a sofa and typical couch dimensions so the fit is predictable.
If your default is curling up, stretching out, or grabbing quick naps, Cozy’s lounge-first build is the better match, especially if you use throw pillows to fine-tune the depth. If the sofa doubles as home-theater seating, Charter stands out for head-and-neck comfort and built-in convenience. If you’re still narrowing down the basics, How to choose sofa upholstery, a quick fabric vs. leather comparison, How to choose sofa seating, How to buy a sofa, and where to place your sofa help clarify trade-offs before you pick a chaise direction.
Limitations
Each pick comes with a clear compromise. Stark’s firmness and modest back support won’t satisfy shoppers who want a soft, sink-in seat. Cozy’s extra-deep sit can frustrate petite users who want feet planted and an upright posture. Santana’s velvet looks sharp but needs more upkeep and won’t feel as airy as a flatter weave. Charter is comfort-first, but its weight, power needs, and price make it a poor fit for frequent movers or tight budgets. For category-level comparisons, it also helps to scan best fabric sofas, best leather sofas, best L-shaped sofas, best sectional sofas, and best convertible sofas.
Living Spaces Sofas vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models
-
A wide spread from entry-priced chaise seating to premium power-recline features
-
Room-friendly sizing options, including compact sofas that are easier to place
-
Distinct roles across the lineup: value, style, lounge comfort, and home-theater function
Alternatives to consider
-
IKEA Kivik, if you want a practical, modular approach and a well-known cover ecosystem
-
La-Z-Boy power recliners, if you prioritize power seating options and in-store support
-
Article Sven, if you prefer a lighter, modern look and a simpler footprint
For broader comparisons, our sofa reviews and buying guides can help. You can also learn more About Dweva or browse the sofa collection.
Pro Tips for Living Spaces Sofas
-
Measure doorways and tight turns before delivery day, not just the wall the sofa will sit on.
-
For chaise models, map walking paths so the chaise doesn’t turn into a daily shin-bumper.
-
Use a small lumbar pillow to keep posture comfortable during longer sessions on plush seats.
-
Rotate and fluff loose back cushions weekly so support stays more consistent.
-
If you choose velvet, keep a soft brush or velvet-safe tool nearby for quick touch-ups.
-
For power recliners, plan outlet access and route cords so foot traffic never crosses them. If it shifts on hard floors, stop a sofa from moving before it scuffs.
-
Use coasters even with cupholders—condensation still happens.
-
Spot-clean promptly; next-day stains are almost always harder than same-day stains. A good baseline is How to clean a couch without saturating the fabric.
-
If you host often, add a washable throw to the most-used seat to protect upholstery. If pets are part of the household, set boundaries early to keep pets off the sofa.
-
Re-check cushion placement after two weeks; foam break-in can change how the seat feels. For planning purposes, it helps to know how long do sofas really last.
FAQs
Which of these sofas is best for long movie nights?
Charter felt most purpose-built for long sessions thanks to power recline, headrest adjustability, and built-in convenience features.
Which sofa felt best for quick naps?
Cozy delivered the easiest “curl up and stay” comfort, especially on the chaise side.
Which option works best for smaller living rooms?
Santana’s more compact footprint made it easiest to place without dominating a smaller room.
If I like a firmer seat, which should I choose?
Stark had the firmest, most upright feel and stayed predictable during edge sit-stand use.