La-Z-Boy’s current sofa lineup leans tall-scale, comfort-first, with a clear split between classic stationary frames and latch-reclining loungers. We tested four mainstream models across laptop work, long movie sessions, quick naps, and shared seating. Two felt better for structured, upright-to-recline support; two leaned more “sink in and stay awhile.” The trade-offs mainly come down to seat depth, room footprint, and how firm you want lumbar support to feel.
Product Overview
| Sofa | Type | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
| Collins Sofa | Stationary | 3.9 / 5.0 | Balanced lounge feel, classic rolled-arm comfort, easy to live with | Pillow-back support can feel soft for strict lumbar needs | Everyday TV watching, mixed postures, casual rooms |
| Paxton Sofa | Stationary | 4.0 / 5.0 | Deep seat, supportive cushion system, strong long-sit stability | Deep seat fit is not universal; footprint feels large | Tall loungers, families who sprawl, relaxed hosting |
| Maddox Reclining 2-seat Sofa | Reclining | 4.1 / 5.0 | Big, uninterrupted reclining comfort; strong “movie-night” ergonomics | Two-seat layout limits group seating; heavier to reposition | Couples or pairs who recline nightly, gamers, nap-friendly setups |
| Trouper Reclining Sofa | Reclining | 4.0 / 5.0 | Supportive split-back feel; dual-end recline; family-friendly structure | Bucket seat shaping is less “free sprawl” than flatter seats | Regular movie nights, upright comfort with easy recline access |
Testing Team Takeaways
After rotating through upright laptop sessions, three-hour binge nights, and quick nap attempts, we kept coming back to the same pattern: Maddox was the easiest to settle into for full recline comfort, while Trouper felt the most consistently supportive in the upper back and neck. Paxton rewarded tall loungers with a deep, stable sit, but shorter legs needed a strategy. Collins stayed the most flexible for mixed postures, yet its softer pillow-back style wasn’t the best match for strict lumbar support.
La-Z-Boy Sofa Comparison Chart
| Spec / Test Focus | Collins Sofa | Paxton Sofa | Maddox Reclining 2-seat Sofa | Trouper Reclining Sofa |
| Type | Stationary | Stationary | Reclining | Reclining |
| Scale guidance | Tall scale (5'10" to 6'2") | Extra Tall scale (6'3" & up) | Tall scale (5'10" to 6'2") | Tall scale (5'10" to 6'2") |
| Overall dimensions (in.) | 89W x 39D x 37.5H | 88W x 42D x 38H | 80W x 40D x 42H | 85W x 42D x 41.5H |
| Seat depth (in.) | 23.5 | 25 | 22 | 20.6 |
| Seat height (in.) | 21 | 20.5 | 21.5 | 20.6 |
| Seat width (in.) | 72 | 72 | 63 | 67.6 |
| Arm height (in.) | 26 | 25 | 25 | 26.6 |
| Weight (lb.) | 132 | 179 | 188 | 212 |
| Recline / mechanism notes | - | - | Outside-arm latch releases; adjustable legrests; waterfall chaise seats | Dual-end reclining with latch releases; bucket chaise seats; can lean back without raising feet |
| Back / cushion positioning (what it feels like in use) | Softer pillow-back “sink,” easy to lounge, less rigid lumbar lock | More anchored long-sit support; deep seat encourages relaxed posture | Big, uninterrupted recline span; easy to transition upright → reclined | More structured upper-back feel; steady head/neck support during long viewing |
| Cooling / breathability (team impression) | Average; depends heavily on cover choice, cushions don’t trap heat as much as recliners | Average; deep cushions can feel warmer on long sits | Average; wide chaise span can run warm for hot sleepers | Average; padded arms and bucket shaping can feel a bit warmer |
| Cleaning practicality (team impression) | Moderate; loose cushions and pillows add fluff/maintenance | Moderate; deeper cushions invite snacking and need regular upkeep | Moderate; recline seams and creases collect crumbs | Moderate; sculpted seats hide debris unless you vacuum deliberately |
How We Tested It
We tested each sofa through daily routines: laptop work, long movie sessions, quick naps, and shared seating with constant posture changes. We tracked Assembly, Cooling, Comfort, Durability, Layout Practicality, Cleaning, and Value, then split “Comfort” into seat comfort, back support, and seat-depth fit to keep scoring honest. We also noted how easily each piece could be repositioned in a real living-room layout and how it felt after repeated weeknight use.
La-Z-Boy Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Collins Sofa
Our Testing Experience
I’m 5'10" and about 185 lbs, and Collins immediately felt like the “default” sofa in a good way—sit upright for a laptop hour, then slide into a semi-reclined TV sprawl without feeling forced into one posture. Marcus (6'1", 230 lbs) liked the wide sitting area, but he also noticed the pillow-back style can encourage a slouch if you let it. Jenna and Ethan’s movie-night test was mostly calm: adjustments didn’t jolt the whole sofa, but you do feel small shifts on loose cushions over a long evening.
What we liked
- Easy, classic lounging posture with a forgiving seat depth
- Roll arms that work as a pillow zone for quick dozes
- Cushions stayed comfortable with routine nightly use
Who it is best for
- Mixed-posture households (upright work, then lounge)
- People who prefer a softer back feel over rigid lumbar
Where it falls short
- If you need a firmer, “holds-you-in-place” lumbar feel
- If you dislike fluffing and re-squaring pillows
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Classic styling; comfortable blown-fiber back feel; flexible for many postures | Back support feels softer; loose pillows add upkeep |
| Good all-around seat depth for lounging without being extreme | Not the best match for strict ergonomic sitting |
Details
- Listed price (as configured): $1,799.00.
- Type: Stationary sofa; style number 610494.
- Scale guidance: Tall scale (5'10" to 6'2").
- Overall dimensions: 89W x 39D x 37.5H; seat width 72; seat depth 23.5; seat height 21; arm height 26; weight 132 lb.
- Comfort / build notes: blown fiber semi-attached backs; Premier standard loose box seat cushions; rolled arms; welt trim; includes two 20” accent pillows.
- Upholstery and options: premium grade fabrics and leathers tested to resist wear and fading; customizable with fabric choices and upgrades; 651 cover options shown.
- Warranty: Limited Lifetime Warranty.
- Cushion count: 3.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Assembly | 4.2 | Standard sofa setup; straightforward placement and day-one usability |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.8 | Comfortable for long sessions, but plush surfaces can warm up over time |
| Seat Comfort | 4.1 | Easy to lounge without feeling swallowed |
| Back Support | 3.7 | Pillow-back feel is relaxing, less “structured” for lumbar-sensitive sits |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Works for mixed postures; not overly deep |
| Durability | 4.1 | Cushions held comfort through repeated nightly use |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.3 | Lighter and simpler than recliners; easier to shift in a room |
| Cleaning | 3.6 | Loose pillows and cushion seams collect everyday debris |
| Value | 3.7 | Solid everyday comfort, but not the most supportive back feel for the price |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Most flexible “daily driver” feel, with softer lumbar structure |
Paxton Sofa
Our Testing Experience
The first thing I noticed is the depth: Paxton invites you to sit back and stay there. On night one, I slid into a semi-recline and felt the seat hold me up instead of letting my hips sag, which mattered after a long desk day. Marcus treated it like a lounge platform—sports on, legs up, no fidgeting. Jenna and Ethan liked the roomy feel for shared movies, but they also had to negotiate where to sit; the depth rewards longer legs, and shorter sitters may want a throw pillow behind the back to keep the spine from rounding.
What we liked
- Deep seat that encourages true lounging
- Support stayed consistent during long sits
- Big, stable “hosting” feel for two people
Who it is best for
- Tall loungers and households that sprawl
- People who want a deeper, relaxed posture without mush
Where it falls short
- Smaller rooms or anyone who dislikes deep seat geometry
- Those who want a perch-like, upright seat by default
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Deep, roomy sit; supportive cushion system; stable for long sessions | Seat depth can be too much for shorter legs; footprint feels large |
| Strong “all-evening” comfort for TV and hosting | Not a quick “sit-and-hop-up” sofa |
Details
- Listed price (as configured): $2,049.00.
- Type: Stationary sofa; style number 610663.
- Scale guidance: Extra Tall scale (6'3" & up).
- Overall dimensions: 88W x 42D x 38H; seat width 72; seat depth 25; seat height 20.5; arm height 25; weight 179 lb.
- Comfort / build notes: deep T-shaped seat cushions; chamber-filled back cushions; ComfortCore cushions; crisp welt trim; low-profile wood legs; matching ottoman available separately.
- Upholstery and options: premium grade fabrics and leathers tested to resist wear and fading; customizable with fabric choices and upgrades; 612 cover options shown.
- Warranty: Limited Lifetime Warranty.
- Cushion count: 2.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Assembly | 4.1 | Typical large-sofa handling; manageable but not “light” |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.8 | Deep cushions can warm up on extended lounging |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Deep, steady comfort that stays supportive over long sessions |
| Back Support | 4.2 | Held posture better than expected for a lounge-forward sofa |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.8 | Great for longer legs; not universal without a back pillow strategy |
| Durability | 4.3 | Stayed consistent through repeated use; no “dead spot” feel |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.9 | Large footprint; reworking layouts takes effort |
| Cleaning | 3.8 | Deep seat invites snacks; routine vacuuming is non-negotiable |
| Value | 3.7 | Strong support and lounge appeal, but the size commitment is real |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Best for deep-seat loungers who want stability, not sink |
Maddox Reclining 2-seat Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Maddox is the sofa that made my lower back unclench after a long day—upright for a bit, then latch down and let the legrest carry the weight. The “wide waterfall chaise” feel is real: once the legrests were up, my body stopped searching for a better spot. Marcus used it like a gaming command center; he liked the big, uninterrupted comfort span but paid attention to how warm it felt during longer sessions. Jenna and Ethan’s couple test was very “settle in and don’t move much”—it’s cozy for two, but it’s still a two-seat layout, so you commit to sharing space.
What we liked
- Easy posture transitions, upright to recline
- Big, continuous leg support for long viewing
- Comfort stayed consistent night after night
Who it is best for
- Two-person households that recline daily
- Tall sitters who want room to stretch out
Where it falls short
- If you regularly host three adults on one sofa
- If you want something light to rearrange often
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Extra-wide reclining seats; strong leg support; relaxing recline geometry | Two-seat format limits group seating; heavier footprint than a stationary sofa |
| Easy latch access and consistent comfort for long sessions | Not as “open sprawl” as a flat stationary seat |
Details
- Listed price (as configured): $1,649.00.
- Type: Reclining sofa; style number 443759.
- Scale guidance: Tall scale (5'10" to 6'2").
- Overall dimensions: 80W x 40D x 42H; seat width 63; seat depth 22; seat height 21.5; arm height 25; weight 188 lb.
- Comfort / build notes: two extra-wide reclining seats; blown-fiber split backs; waterfall chaise seats; adjustable legrests; outside-arm latch releases; track arms with flanged welt trim; high grade foam seat cushions.
- Upholstery and options: premium grade fabrics and leathers tested to resist wear and fading; customizable with fabric choices and upgrades; includes Limited Lifetime Warranty.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Assembly | 4.0 | Heavier handling than stationary; once placed, it’s ready for real use |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.7 | Plush recline posture can run warmer on long sessions |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5 | Most “stay put” comfort of the group, especially in recline |
| Back Support | 4.2 | Comfortable split-back feel; steady support in long viewing posture |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.1 | Works well for taller bodies without feeling overly deep |
| Durability | 4.3 | Held its comfort through repeated recline cycles and nightly use |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.7 | Reclining form factor makes layout changes more involved |
| Cleaning | 3.8 | More seams and creases than stationary seating; needs routine vacuuming |
| Value | 4.2 | Strong comfort-per-dollar for nightly recliners |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Best pick if your default mode is recline |
Trouper Reclining Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Trouper felt like the “movie-night anchor” sofa: sit down, get supported, and stop shifting. The split-back support made a difference for me on long binge nights—I didn’t have to build a pillow tower to keep my neck happy. Marcus liked the bucket-seat shaping for staying centered during sports, but he also pointed out it’s less of a freeform sprawl than a flatter seat. Jenna and Ethan’s test went smoothly because the end seats recline, so each person can dial in their angle without turning the whole couch into a negotiation.
What we liked
- Supportive head/neck/back feel over long sessions
- Dual-end recline makes shared nights easier
- Consistent posture, less sliding-forward fatigue
Who it is best for
- Regular TV households that want structure with recline
- People who like a guided, centered seat shape
Where it falls short
- If you want a flat, anything-goes lounging surface
- If you rearrange living-room layouts frequently
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Structured split-back support; dual-end recline; comfortable bucket-chaise feel | Bucket shaping limits sprawl; heavier to reposition |
| Easy to stay comfortable without constant pillow adjustments | Not as “wide-open” as a deep stationary seat |
Details
- Listed price (as configured): $2,099.00.
- Type: Reclining sofa; style number 444724.
- Scale guidance: Tall scale (5'10" to 6'2").
- Overall dimensions: 85W x 42D x 41.5H; seat width 67.6; seat depth 20.6; seat height 20.6; arm height 26.6; weight 212 lb; fully extended 65 in.
- Comfort / build notes: three sculpted bucket seats; blown-fiber split back cushions for head/neck/back support; dual reclining end seats; padded wrap-over arms; bucket chaise seats and footrests; latch releases; high grade foam seat cushion; includes Limited Lifetime Warranty; customizable with fabrics and upgrades.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Assembly | 4.0 | Large and heavy; once placed, it behaves predictably in daily use |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.7 | Padded shaping can feel warmer during extended lounging |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Consistent comfort with a supportive, centered feel |
| Back Support | 4.2 | Split-back design felt steady for long viewing sessions |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.1 | Shallower depth suits upright-to-recline posture without excessive slouch |
| Durability | 4.3 | Held up well across repeated recline cycles and weeknight use |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.6 | Recliner footprint makes layout changes a commitment |
| Cleaning | 3.8 | Sculpted seats hide crumbs; needs deliberate vacuuming |
| Value | 3.9 | Strong comfort and structure, but higher price than the two-seat recliner |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Best structured recliner sofa for long TV nights |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
| Collins Sofa | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
| Paxton Sofa | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.9 |
| Maddox Reclining 2-seat Sofa | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.7 |
| Trouper Reclining Sofa | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.6 |
On the numbers, Maddox is the most consistently strong for nightly recliners, mainly because it pairs top-tier seat comfort with a strong overall value score. Paxton and Trouper are the steadiest “all-rounders” if you want support without feeling perched—Paxton wins for deep lounging, while Trouper wins for structured TV posture. Collins is the most flexible for mixed postures and room tweaks, but it’s the least “locked-in” for lumbar support.
How to Choose a La-Z-Boy Sofa
Start with posture: if you recline nightly, pick Maddox for two-person routines or Trouper for a more family-ready layout. Next, match seat depth to your legs—Paxton’s depth rewards tall loungers, while Collins is the safer middle ground. For couples, prioritize how much movement you notice: the dual-end recline feel of Trouper is the smoothest for shared nights. For typical scenarios: tall loungers who sprawl should choose Paxton; nightly recliners should choose Maddox; mixed-use living rooms should choose Collins or Trouper depending on how structured you want the back to feel.
Limitations
Across these models, the biggest trade-offs are scale and footprint: three options skew tall-scale, and the deeper seats demand space and a plan for leg support. Paxton isn’t ideal for shorter legs or smaller rooms; Trouper is less suited to people who want a flat sprawl surface; Maddox is limiting for households that host three adults on one sofa; Collins is not the best fit for buyers who need firm, consistent lumbar structure.
La-Z-Boy Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models
- Tall-scale comfort and lounge-forward proportions across the lineup
- Reclining options that prioritize day-to-day TV comfort and posture changes
- Custom upholstery approach with broad cover selection
-
Alternatives to consider
- Crate & Barrel Lounge: deep, sink-in lounge collection for big sprawl seating
- West Elm Harmony: plush, deep seat sofa built for lounging and spreading out
- Room & Board Metro: balanced “Goldilocks” feel for everyday sitting comfort
Pro Tips for La-Z-Boy Sofa
- Measure the full “path” into the room (doorways, turns, elevators) before you commit, not just the wall space.
- If you’re between sizes, prioritize seat depth over width; depth is what decides whether you perch or lounge.
- For deep-seat models, keep a supportive lumbar pillow in the room so shorter sitters can reset posture fast.
- Plan your TV sightline before you place a reclining sofa; a few inches of misalignment becomes annoying nightly.
- Vacuum seams and creases weekly if you snack on the sofa; crumbs hide in sculpted seats and along welt lines.
- Rotate and re-square loose cushions regularly so one “favorite spot” doesn’t become the only comfortable spot.
- If you run warm, choose a cover that feels cooler to the touch and avoid piling throws on the seating surface.
- Treat recline sessions like posture sessions: start upright, then recline—your back tends to feel better later.
- When testing in-store, do a full two-minute “movie slouch” and a two-minute “laptop upright” before deciding.
FAQs
Which of these fits best if I’m tall and like to stretch out?
Paxton is the most lounge-forward in seat depth and rewards longer legs, while Maddox is the easiest to fully recline into for nightly stretching. Collins can work, but it won’t feel as deliberately deep as Paxton.
Which one feels best for long TV sessions without constant readjusting?
Trouper was the easiest to stay comfortable on because the split-back support kept head and neck posture steady. Maddox is a close second, especially if you prefer to recline early and stay there.
Which one is easiest for a couple sharing the sofa?
Trouper’s dual-end recline makes it the smoothest for two people to settle into their own angles. Maddox is great for two, but it’s a tighter two-seat commitment, while Paxton works if both people like a deep lounge posture.
