Up to 60% off sofas & mattresses — limited‑time deals.
Fast U.S. shipping (3–7 days) • Easy 30‑day returns • Secure checkout.

Your cart

Your cart is empty

Explore our range of products

We receive free products to review and participate in affiliate programs, where we are compensated for items purchased through links from our site. See our disclosure page for more information.

Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box Mattress Reviews (2026)

The Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box is a 10-inch flippable foam mattress-in-a-box with two usable feels: a plusher side for more contouring and a firmer side for steadier support. In our tests, its biggest strengths were motion isolation and the flexibility to switch surfaces without changing beds. The trade-offs were softer edges, modest bounce, and more heat buildup on the plush side.

Table of Contents

Product Overview

Mattress Overall Score Pros Cons Ideal For
Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box 4.0/5.0 Flippable plush/firm feel; strong motion isolation; stable 10-inch profile Edge support is only average; plush side sleeps warmer; limited bounce Combination sleepers; couples; shoppers who want two feels in one bed

Final Verdict

In our actual tests, the firmer side delivered the most consistent lower-back support, while the plush side felt better when we wanted a little more contouring. Motion transfer stayed impressively low for a foam mattress. The main drawback was the perimeter, which felt less secure when sitting or sleeping right at the edge.

  • Who It's For

  • Who It's Not For

    • Hot sleepers who dislike heat buildup

    • People who spend a lot of time right on the edge

    • Anyone who wants a springier, more responsive surface

Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box Mattress

How We Tested It

We slept on both sides over multiple weeks and tracked how each surface handled back, side, and combination sleep. We also paid attention to how distinct each side felt during our firmness checks. We scored support by checking alignment and next-morning back and hip feedback. Cooling came from heat buildup during longer, still periods. Pressure relief focused on shoulder and hip comfort in side sleep. Motion isolation came from partner-movement drills, responsiveness from how quickly the surface recovered during turns, and edge support from sit-and-rise and edge-sleep checks.

Our Testing Experience

Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box

In our actual tests, the plush side gave our shoulders and hips a softer landing, but after longer stretches we usually preferred the firmer side for steadier midsection support. Marcus, our heavier tester, noticed more warmth on the plush side and better alignment on the firm side. Jenna and Ethan's partner-movement drills also showed that movement stayed well contained, which helped the mattress feel calm and quiet at night.

  • What we liked

    • Two usable firmness options without adding a topper

    • Low motion transfer for shared sleep

    • The firmer side kept the torso from sinking too far

  • Who it is best for

    • Combination sleepers who switch between back and side sleep

    • Couples who want less partner disturbance

    • Shoppers who want a firmer side for reading, recovery, or daytime use

  • Where it falls short

Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box Mattress

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Flippable design gives two distinct feels Plush side can sleep warm for heat-sensitive sleepers
Motion isolation worked well in our partner tests Edge support is only average
Firmer side offered steadier lumbar support Not much spring or lift
Quiet, stable foam feel May not suit sleepers who want a deep plush cradle every night

Details

  • Price at time of verification: ₱14,399.77

  • Type: Flippable foam mattress-in-a-box

  • Comfort design: plush side uses Senso Memory® foam with TrillTex foam; firm side uses high-density Orthofirm® foam

  • Thickness: 10 inches

  • Foam certification: CertiPUR-US® certified foam

  • Sizes: Single (36" x 75"), Double (48" x 75"), Full Double (54" x 75"), Queen (60" x 75"), King (72" x 78")

  • Warranty: 10 years

  • Shipping on the official product page: Luzon 7 business days; VisMin 7–30 business days, depending on serviceable areas

  • Returns and exchanges: requests are handled within 30 days of delivery or purchase for eligible reasons

  • Custom sizes: not eligible for return or refund

Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box Mattress

Review Score

Metric Score What we observed
Support 4.3/5 The firmer side kept the hips from drifting and felt more consistent night to night.
Cooling 3.7/5 The plush side held more heat during longer, still periods.
Pressure Relief 4.2/5 The plush side cushioned the shoulders and hips better than the firm side.
Motion Isolation 4.5/5 Partner movement stayed muted and localized in our drills.
Responsiveness 3.8/5 Turning was easier on the firm side; the plush side was slower to release.
Edge Support 3.6/5 Fine for occasional edge use, less ideal for daily sit-on-the-edge routines.
Durability 4.2/5 The mattress stayed stable over time, and the two-sided design should help spread wear.

Overall Score: 4.0/5.0

Choosing Guide

This mattress makes the most sense if you want two distinct firmness options in one bed and you do not need strong edge reinforcement or a lively, springy feel. In our testing, back sleepers and combination sleepers got the most consistent support from the firmer side, while the plush side worked better when we wanted more contouring for side sleep.

If you are a lightweight side sleeper who wants a deeper cradle, a softer all-foam alternative may suit you better. If you want more airflow, stronger edges, and easier repositioning, an innerspring or hybrid is the better direction.

Limitations

The main compromise is that this is still a foam-forward mattress. The plush side can hold more warmth, and the bed has less pushback than a spring-based model. Edge support is serviceable, but people who sit on the bed every day or sleep near the outer few inches may want something sturdier.

Vs. Alternatives

  • Why you might choose this mattress

    • You want two feels in one bed instead of committing to one firmness

    • You care more about motion isolation than bounce

    • You prefer a flatter, steadier surface for back support

  • What to look at instead

    • A classic innerspring like the Saatva Classic if edge support and lift matter most

    • A softer memory foam bed if you want deeper sink at the shoulders and hips

    • A hybrid like the Brooklyn Bedding Signature Hybrid if you want easier repositioning and more bounce

Pro Tips

  • Spend several nights on each side before deciding which one you prefer.

  • If you sleep hot, pair the plush side with lighter, more breathable bedding.

  • Rotate the mattress periodically to spread wear more evenly.

  • Use a solid base or platform if edge stability matters to you.

  • Start with the firm side if lower-back tightness is your main issue.

  • Give the mattress a short settling period after setup before judging the feel.

FAQs

Is the firm side too hard for side sleeping?

It can be for some people, especially at the shoulder. In our tests, the firm side worked better for back sleep and structured lounging, while the plush side felt more comfortable for longer side-sleep stretches.

How different do the two sides really feel?

The difference is easy to notice. The plush side feels more conforming and slower to rebound, while the firm side feels flatter, steadier, and easier to turn on.

Does it isolate motion well for couples?

Yes. Our movement drills stayed calm and localized, so smaller turns did not travel far across the surface.

What's the biggest comfort trade-off?

If you want bounce and strong edge security, this mattress will not feel as lively or as locked in at the perimeter as many hybrids and innersprings.

The Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box is a 10-inch flippable foam mattress-in-a-box with two usable feels: a plusher side for more contouring and a firmer side for steadier support. In our tests, its biggest strengths were motion isolation and the flexibility to switch surfaces without changing beds. The trade-offs were softer edges, modest bounce, and more heat buildup on the plush side.

Table of Contents

Product Overview

Mattress Overall Score Pros Cons Ideal For
Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box 4.0/5.0 Flippable plush/firm feel; strong motion isolation; stable 10-inch profile Edge support is only average; plush side sleeps warmer; limited bounce Combination sleepers; couples; shoppers who want two feels in one bed

Final Verdict

In our actual tests, the firmer side delivered the most consistent lower-back support, while the plush side felt better when we wanted a little more contouring. Motion transfer stayed impressively low for a foam mattress. The main drawback was the perimeter, which felt less secure when sitting or sleeping right at the edge.

  • Who It's For

  • Who It's Not For

    • Hot sleepers who dislike heat buildup

    • People who spend a lot of time right on the edge

    • Anyone who wants a springier, more responsive surface

Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box Mattress

How We Tested It

We slept on both sides over multiple weeks and tracked how each surface handled back, side, and combination sleep. We also paid attention to how distinct each side felt during our firmness checks. We scored support by checking alignment and next-morning back and hip feedback. Cooling came from heat buildup during longer, still periods. Pressure relief focused on shoulder and hip comfort in side sleep. Motion isolation came from partner-movement drills, responsiveness from how quickly the surface recovered during turns, and edge support from sit-and-rise and edge-sleep checks.

Our Testing Experience

Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box

In our actual tests, the plush side gave our shoulders and hips a softer landing, but after longer stretches we usually preferred the firmer side for steadier midsection support. Marcus, our heavier tester, noticed more warmth on the plush side and better alignment on the firm side. Jenna and Ethan's partner-movement drills also showed that movement stayed well contained, which helped the mattress feel calm and quiet at night.

  • What we liked

    • Two usable firmness options without adding a topper

    • Low motion transfer for shared sleep

    • The firmer side kept the torso from sinking too far

  • Who it is best for

    • Combination sleepers who switch between back and side sleep

    • Couples who want less partner disturbance

    • Shoppers who want a firmer side for reading, recovery, or daytime use

  • Where it falls short

Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box Mattress

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Flippable design gives two distinct feels Plush side can sleep warm for heat-sensitive sleepers
Motion isolation worked well in our partner tests Edge support is only average
Firmer side offered steadier lumbar support Not much spring or lift
Quiet, stable foam feel May not suit sleepers who want a deep plush cradle every night

Details

  • Price at time of verification: ₱14,399.77

  • Type: Flippable foam mattress-in-a-box

  • Comfort design: plush side uses Senso Memory® foam with TrillTex foam; firm side uses high-density Orthofirm® foam

  • Thickness: 10 inches

  • Foam certification: CertiPUR-US® certified foam

  • Sizes: Single (36" x 75"), Double (48" x 75"), Full Double (54" x 75"), Queen (60" x 75"), King (72" x 78")

  • Warranty: 10 years

  • Shipping on the official product page: Luzon 7 business days; VisMin 7–30 business days, depending on serviceable areas

  • Returns and exchanges: requests are handled within 30 days of delivery or purchase for eligible reasons

  • Custom sizes: not eligible for return or refund

Uratex Trill Mattress-in-a-Box Mattress

Review Score

Metric Score What we observed
Support 4.3/5 The firmer side kept the hips from drifting and felt more consistent night to night.
Cooling 3.7/5 The plush side held more heat during longer, still periods.
Pressure Relief 4.2/5 The plush side cushioned the shoulders and hips better than the firm side.
Motion Isolation 4.5/5 Partner movement stayed muted and localized in our drills.
Responsiveness 3.8/5 Turning was easier on the firm side; the plush side was slower to release.
Edge Support 3.6/5 Fine for occasional edge use, less ideal for daily sit-on-the-edge routines.
Durability 4.2/5 The mattress stayed stable over time, and the two-sided design should help spread wear.

Overall Score: 4.0/5.0

Choosing Guide

This mattress makes the most sense if you want two distinct firmness options in one bed and you do not need strong edge reinforcement or a lively, springy feel. In our testing, back sleepers and combination sleepers got the most consistent support from the firmer side, while the plush side worked better when we wanted more contouring for side sleep.

If you are a lightweight side sleeper who wants a deeper cradle, a softer all-foam alternative may suit you better. If you want more airflow, stronger edges, and easier repositioning, an innerspring or hybrid is the better direction.

Limitations

The main compromise is that this is still a foam-forward mattress. The plush side can hold more warmth, and the bed has less pushback than a spring-based model. Edge support is serviceable, but people who sit on the bed every day or sleep near the outer few inches may want something sturdier.

Vs. Alternatives

  • Why you might choose this mattress

    • You want two feels in one bed instead of committing to one firmness

    • You care more about motion isolation than bounce

    • You prefer a flatter, steadier surface for back support

  • What to look at instead

    • A classic innerspring like the Saatva Classic if edge support and lift matter most

    • A softer memory foam bed if you want deeper sink at the shoulders and hips

    • A hybrid like the Brooklyn Bedding Signature Hybrid if you want easier repositioning and more bounce

Pro Tips

  • Spend several nights on each side before deciding which one you prefer.

  • If you sleep hot, pair the plush side with lighter, more breathable bedding.

  • Rotate the mattress periodically to spread wear more evenly.

  • Use a solid base or platform if edge stability matters to you.

  • Start with the firm side if lower-back tightness is your main issue.

  • Give the mattress a short settling period after setup before judging the feel.

FAQs

Is the firm side too hard for side sleeping?

It can be for some people, especially at the shoulder. In our tests, the firm side worked better for back sleep and structured lounging, while the plush side felt more comfortable for longer side-sleep stretches.

How different do the two sides really feel?

The difference is easy to notice. The plush side feels more conforming and slower to rebound, while the firm side feels flatter, steadier, and easier to turn on.

Does it isolate motion well for couples?

Yes. Our movement drills stayed calm and localized, so smaller turns did not travel far across the surface.

What's the biggest comfort trade-off?

If you want bounce and strong edge security, this mattress will not feel as lively or as locked in at the perimeter as many hybrids and innersprings.

Previous post
Next post
Back to Best Mattress Reviews

Our Testing Team

Chris Miller

Lead Tester

Chris oversees the full testing pipeline for mattresses, sofas, and other home products. He coordinates the team, designs scoring frameworks, and lives with every product long enough to feel real strengths and weaknesses. His combination-sleeping and mixed lounging habits keep him focused on long-term comfort and support.

Marcus Reed

Heavyweight Sofa & Mattress Tester

Marcus brings a heavier build and heat-sensitive profile into every test. He pushes deep cushions, edges, and frames harder than most users. His feedback highlights whether a design holds up under load, runs hot, or collapses into a hammock-like slump during long gaming or streaming sessions.

Carlos Alvarez

Posture & Work-From-Home Specialist

Carlos spends long hours working from sofas and beds with a laptop. He tracks how mid-back, neck, and lumbar regions respond to different setups. His notes reveal whether a product keeps posture neutral during extended sitting or lying, and whether small adjustments still feel stable and controlled.

Mia Chen

Petite Side-Sleeper & Lounger

Mia tests how mattresses and sofas treat a smaller frame during side sleeping and curled-up lounging. She feels pressure and seat-depth problems very quickly. Her feedback exposes designs that swallow shorter users, leave feet dangling, or create sharp pressure points at shoulders, hips, and knees.

Jenna Brooks

Couple Comfort & Motion Tester

Jenna evaluates how well sofas and mattresses handle real shared use with a partner. She tracks motion transfer, usable width, and edge comfort when two adults spread out. Her comments highlight whether a product supports relaxed couple lounging, easy repositioning, and quiet nights without constant disturbance.

Jamal Davis

Tall, Active-Body Tester

Jamal brings a tall, athletic frame and post-workout soreness into the lab. He checks seat depth, leg support, and surface responsiveness on every product. His notes show whether cushions bounce back, frames feel solid under long legs, and sleep surfaces support joints during recovery stretches and naps.

Ethan Cole

Restless Lounger & Partner Tester

Ethan acts as the moving partner in many couple-focused tests. He shifts positions frequently and pays attention to how easily a surface lets him turn, slide, or return after short breaks. His feedback exposes cushions that feel too squishy, too sticky, or poorly shaped for real-world lounging patterns.