Sleep testing turns strange once a retail brand launches its own mattress line. I wanted to know whether Havertys house-brand beds actually compete with national names or just fill floor space. That question tugged at me every time I walked past the 1885 display.
I pulled our full crew together again. I handle coordination and notes, Marcus brings the bigger frame and heat sensitivity, Mia guards pressure points, while Jamal chases bounce and support for an athletic body. We rotated across five Havertys mattresses from the 1885 2.0 and 1885 Youth Essentials series, logging every night.
We used the same routine for each bed. I tracked lower-back tension and alignment through full weeks, Marcus chased edge feel and temperature, Mia focused on shoulder comfort, Jamal checked responsiveness during stretches and late returns from workouts. By the end, certain Havertys mattresses felt dialed in for specific sleepers, while others landed squarely in “very average” territory.
- 1. Main Havertys-brand mattresses we tested
- 2. Testing Team Takeaways
- 3. Havertys Mattress Comparison Chart
- 4. What We Tested and How We Tested It
-
5. Havertys Mattress: Our Testing Experience
- 5.1 1885 Collection 2.0 Firm Tight Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Spine-Stabilizer”
- 5.2 1885 Collection 2.0 Medium Pillow Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Everyday Hybrid”
- 5.3 1885 Collection 2.0 Soft Tight Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Pressure-Relief Favorite”
- 5.4 1885 Youth Essentials Firm – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Kid-Friendly Support Base”
- 5.5 1885 Youth Essentials Pillow Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Youth Comfort Upgrade”
- 6. Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
- 7. Best Picks
- 8. How to Choose the Havertys Mattress?
- 9. Limitations
- 10. Policies at a Glance
- 11. FAQs
- 12. Related Post
Main Havertys-brand mattresses we tested
| Mattress | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price* | Overall Score |
| 1885 Collection 2.0 Firm Tight Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Spine-Stabilizer” | Strong support, firm feel, good edge stability, low motion transfer | Too firm for many side sleepers, modest pressure relief | Back sleepers, heavier sleepers, stomach sleepers needing hip support | Approx. mid-range, often around upper-middle price for firm hybrids | 4.4 / 5 |
| 1885 Collection 2.0 Medium Pillow Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Everyday Hybrid” | Balanced feel, contour plus support, solid cooling, couple friendly | Lighter side sleepers may still want more plushness | Average-weight combo sleepers, couples sharing a bed | Mid-range; queen usually under typical premium hybrid pricing | 4.6 / 5 |
| 1885 Collection 2.0 Soft Tight Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Pressure-Relief Favorite” | Deep cushioning, strong pressure relief, wrapped coil support underneath | Too soft for strict stomach sleepers, some heavier backs | Side sleepers, lighter bodies, people wanting “cushiony” top | Similar band to other 1885 mattresses, often sale driven | 4.5 / 5 |
| 1885 Youth Essentials Firm – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Kid-Friendly Support Base” | Firmer surface, good support for growing bodies, lower profile feel | Not plush enough for teens wanting cloudlike softness | Kids needing structure, parents prioritizing durability | Youth-focused pricing, usually below adult 1885 models | 4.2 / 5 |
| 1885 Youth Essentials Pillow Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Youth Comfort Upgrade” | 12.5" profile, five foam layers, gel quilt foam, softer top feel | Shorter 5-year warranty, not ideal for very heavy teens | Kids and tweens wanting softer comfort, lighter side sleepers | Around mid-range youth pricing, often in the high hundreds | 4.3 / 5 |
Testing Team Takeaways
I moved across these Havertys mattresses with my usual combination pattern. On the firm tight top, my lower back felt pinned in a straight, almost disciplined line. During late-night laptop sessions, lumbar contact stayed consistent, which kept that dull desk ache from flaring. On the soft tight top, my shoulders melted more, yet my hips still sat on a clear support shelf from those wrapped coils that the 1885 line uses.
Marcus arrived with his usual comment before even lying down. “If this thing traps heat, I’m out,” he muttered while pressing a hand into the medium pillow top. The surface showed slow memory foam response over a springy core. Under his 230-pound frame, the firm tight top finally gave him that “reset” feel he loves after long days. He mentioned “no hammock sag under my hips” and kept pointing at the edge, where he ties shoes every morning, saying the rails felt noticeably more solid than many retail hybrids.
Mia focused straight on the soft tight top and the medium pillow top. She lay on her side, pulled her knees slightly up, then waited without speaking. After a few minutes, she whispered, “Pressure off my shoulders, finally.” That reaction came strongest on the soft tight top and Youth Essentials Pillow Top, where the thicker foam stack, including gel quilt foam, cushioned her outer hip. She still flagged the firm tight top as “too flat for my size”, especially under the shoulder head.
Jamal used these beds like training tools. He sat on the edge of each 1885 adult model, bounced once, then lay back quickly. On the medium pillow top he said, “I get drive out of the surface, not stuck,” which matched my notes on responsiveness. During side sleeping after basketball, his knees met a steady resistance from the wrapped coil system. On the Youth Essentials Firm he commented that support felt strong, yet the surface lacked enough give for an adult frame during long nights.
From this combined experience, Havertys 1885 mattresses showed a clear pattern. Adult 2.0 models delivered hybrid-style structure with targeted foam variation, while Youth Essentials versions pushed durability and steady support for growing bodies, with the pillow top giving them a gentler landing.
Havertys Mattress Comparison Chart
| Mattress | Firmness (1–10)* | Type | Approx. Thickness | Key Materials | Cooling Performance | Support | Pressure Relief | Responsiveness | Motion Isolation | Durability Expectation |
| 1885 2.0 Firm Tight Top | 8 | Hybrid-style, wrapped coils with firm foam | Around 12" class | High-density CertiPUR-US foams, isotonic-style memory foam near surface, individually wrapped coils | Above average for a firm hybrid, breathable quilt plus coil airflow | Very strong, emphasized under hips and lower back | Moderate, focused more on stability than plushness | Quick for a hybrid, easy turning | Good, wrapped coils plus foam help dampen | High, due to coil unit and dense foams |
| 1885 2.0 Medium Pillow Top | 6.5 | Hybrid pillow top | Around 12"–13" feel | Plush CertiPUR-US foam, Isotonic Memory Foam, wrapped coils | Strong, breathable layers plus coil airflow help hot sleepers | Solid, especially for average and slightly heavier bodies | High, pillow top eases shoulders and hips | Lively, Jamal felt clean “drive” while moving | Very good for couples according to our notes | High, similar coil and foam quality to firm model |
| 1885 2.0 Soft Tight Top | 5.5 | Hybrid plush tight top | Around 12" class | Plush foam, adaptive memory foam, wrapped coils | Good, though softer foam holds a bit more warmth | Moderate-strong, core still supports alignment | Very high, strongest pressure relief among these | Moderate-fast, softer foams slow movement slightly | Good, some bounce leaks through coils | High, core mirrors other 1885 2.0 builds |
| 1885 Youth Essentials Firm | 7.5 | Youth innerspring with foam comfort system | Slightly thinner than full 2.0 line | High-density CertiPUR-US foam stack over coil core | Decent, better once bedding is breathable | Strong, tuned for lighter, growing bodies | Moderate, feels a bit flat for side-sleeping adults | Fast, springier feel that kids usually enjoy | Moderate, kids move a lot but impact feels contained | High, built with durability in mind for youth rooms |
| 1885 Youth Essentials Pillow Top | 6 | Youth pillow top | 12.5" stated height | Five layers of high-density CertiPUR-US foams, including plush upholstery foam and gel quilt foam, over coil core | Good, gel quilt foam helps temperature regulation | Adequate-strong for most kids, maybe light teens | High for lightweight side sleepers and growing joints | Moderate-fast, pillow top slightly slows response | Good, coil unit plus foam stack dampen movement | Moderate-high, backed by 5-year non-prorated warranty |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We followed our standard multi-week mattress testing routine for these Havertys models. Each bed lived in a controlled bedroom rotation, with the same bases, similar bedding weights, and consistent room temperatures. This method helped us isolate mattress performance instead of letting pillow or frame differences confuse impressions.
I spent full workweeks on each adult 1885 mattress, shifting between back and side posture. I tracked morning lower-back feel, mid-sleep awakenings, and afternoon fatigue. For pressure and joint comfort, Mia rotated mainly through the soft tight top, medium pillow top, and Youth Essentials Pillow Top, logging longer side-sleep stretches.
Marcus handled the heat and edge protocol. He puts a sheet over the bare cover, lies quietly for twenty minutes, then reports on warmth buildup. He also sits at several spots near the perimeter, tying shoes and leaning forward, then stands from a low-seated posture to check collapse. Jamal evaluated responsiveness by performing slow turns, quick rollovers, and edge sitting after workouts.
We also ran brief bounce and motion tests, even without Jenna’s couple protocol for this brand pass. I dropped a small weight near the center and tracked movement through feel, then asked another tester to climb in while I remained still. That process produced our motion isolation numbers and shaped several score remarks later.
Support ratings came from a combination of posture checks, subjective comments, and a quick alignment check using photos from the side, taken while each tester lay in their natural sleeping pose. Pressure relief scores leaned heavily on Mia’s and my notes, plus Marcus’s reactions on his shoulders during occasional side trials.
Havertys Mattress: Our Testing Experience
1885 Collection 2.0 Firm Tight Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Spine-Stabilizer”
Our Testing Experience
I always start with the firmest option. The 1885 2.0 Firm Tight Top looked plain at first glance, yet the surface felt dense under my hand. On the first night, lying on my back, I noticed my hips staying level with my mid-back instead of dropping. The wrapped coil core and firm foam layers created a tablelike stability under my lumbar area, without turning the surface into a rock.
During a late session finishing notes, I propped myself with two pillows and sat semi-reclined. That posture usually triggers a stubborn ache near my lower spine. On this mattress, the area stayed quiet. I wrote down, “firm, but not jabbing,” which matched the tight-top construction. Side sleeping felt more mixed. My shoulders pressed into the surface with some resistance, and after several hours my top arm felt slightly cramped.
Marcus treated this mattress like a home base. Under his bigger frame, the coil unit finally had enough pushback to prevent his hips from sinking. After one night, he said, “This feels like a reset station,” meaning he could lie flat and let his back decompress. Edge sitting impressed him even more. He perched near the side, leaned forward, then stood several times. His comment came quickly. “Edge holds me without that sliding feeling,” which lined up with the firmer perimeter.
Jamal used the mattress after a heavy leg workout. He rolled sideways several times, noting how the surface reacted. On the 1885 Firm, his phrase was, “Plenty of bounce, no trampoline.” Translation here means the springs gave him enough energy to move easily, yet they did not throw him around. Side sleeping for him felt tolerable but not indulgent, and his notes highlighted a straight spine rather than luxurious pressure relief.
From the perspective of sleeper types, this firm tight top works best for strict back sleepers, heavier bodies, and many stomach sleepers. Combination sleepers get stability yet sacrifice some shoulder comfort. Lighter side sleepers, especially around Mia’s size, will likely find it too unyielding except for short naps.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Very strong support under hips and lower back | Too firm for many dedicated side sleepers |
| Firm edge feel for sitting and getting up | Surface feels somewhat rigid for petite bodies |
| Good temperature performance for a firm hybrid design | Limited plushness for people wanting a cushy top |
| Low motion transfer for a coil-based mattress | Not ideal for kids or very light teens as a primary bed |
Details
- Brand / Line: 1885 Collection 2.0 by Havertys, exclusive in-house line
- Construction type: Hybrid-style design with individually wrapped coil core and firm foam comfort system
- Height: Around 12" published height for queen size
- Firmness feel (our scale): Around 8 out of 10, clearly firm
- Comfort materials: High-density CertiPUR-US foams with thinner contour layers above the tight top cover
- Support system: Individually wrapped coils with targeted support behavior, edge-enhanced layout across perimeter
- Cooling features: Breathable quilt, open coil unit for airflow, relatively thin comfort stack, no heavy slow-responding gel slabs
- Available sizes: Typical range from twin through king on Havertys site, plus certain split foundations
- Best sleeper profiles: Heavier back sleepers, combination back-and-stomach sleepers, people needing strong lumbar support
- Pressure profile: Modest pressure relief, more tolerance-friendly for heavier bodies than for petite side sleepers
- Responsiveness: Quick response from coil unit, slightly tempered by firm foam top
- Motion isolation: Wrapped coils and foam give above-average control of night movement for a spring mattress
- Durability outlook: Coil gauge and foam density feel tuned for long-term stability, especially under heavier frames
- Shipping and setup: Delivered via Havertys Top Drawer Delivery with setup and packaging removal available in most regions
- Trial / comfort policy: Comfort exchange window generally 30–90 nights depending on program, with one re-selection allowed
- Warranty: Standard mattress warranty through Havertys program, details confirmed at purchase
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Support | 4.8 | Hips and lumbar stayed level for me and Marcus, even under higher weight. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.7 | Shoulders and outer hips felt firm, especially for Mia-sized bodies. |
| Cooling | 4.4 | Firm foams and coil airflow limited heat retention during Marcus’s heat tests. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Wrapped coils and dense surface foams cut down partner movement nicely. |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Jamal reported easy turning without trampoline effect or sticky foam feel. |
| Edge Support | 4.8 | Edge sitting remained stable under Marcus’s routine, with no rolling sensation. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Coil quality and firm foam stack should resist impressions under heavier users. |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | Very strong firm hybrid, especially for support-focused sleepers. |
1885 Collection 2.0 Medium Pillow Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Everyday Hybrid”
Our Testing Experience
Switching onto the 1885 2.0 Medium Pillow Top felt like stepping back from strict discipline into something more forgiving. My lower back still caught steady support from the coil system, yet the pillow top let my shoulders slide deeper before meeting resistance. After a full week, my notes read, “balanced, easy to live on.”
On the second night, I shifted from side to back several times without waking fully. The upper foam stack, including isotonic memory foam, cradled my shoulders and hips just enough to cut down pressure points. The spine photographs we took from the side showed a gentle, neutral curve during back sleeping, which I rarely see on cheaper pillow tops.
Marcus started hot-sleeper tests here. He lay still under a medium-weight comforter and waited for that familiar heat bubble. Ten minutes passed, then fifteen. His comment came through later. “This kind of mattress runs warmer than a thin firm bed, yet the top doesn’t choke heat.” The breathable quilt, coil airflow, and less aggressive slow-response foam helped.
Mia gravitated toward this model when the soft tight top felt almost too melty for some evenings. In her view, “this kind of medium profile gives me a soft pocket without swallowing me.” Her shoulders settled comfortably, and her outer hip pain never flared during long side sessions. She still preferred the soft tight top on high-stress days, yet she ranked the medium pillow top more versatile.
Jamal loved this mattress for post-workout nights. He rolled across the surface and launched a small hop near the center. “I get drive out of the surface without feeling like I skitter,” he wrote. This matched our responsiveness measurements, where the coil core and padding layers combined into a balanced bounce profile.
From the perspective of typical buyers, this mattress suits average-weight sleepers, combo sleepers, and couples who want a hybrid feel without extreme firmness or sink. Heavier pure stomach sleepers may still prefer the firm version, while extremely plush seekers move toward the soft tight top instead.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Balanced mix of support and cushioning | Not soft enough for ultra-plush seekers |
| Good cooling for a foam-topped hybrid | Heavier strict stomach sleepers may want more firmness |
| Couple-friendly motion control with some bounce | Petite side sleepers might prefer extra plushness |
| Versatile feel for guest rooms and main bedrooms | Pillow top may compress slightly faster than tight tops over many years |
Details
- Brand / Line: 1885 Collection 2.0 by Havertys, part of the in-house anniversary line
- Construction type: Hybrid pillow top, wrapped coil core, multi-layer foam pillow surface
- Key comfort materials: Plush CertiPUR-US foam, Isotonic Memory Foam highlighted in product description
- Support system: Individually wrapped coils for targeted support and motion isolation
- Firmness feel: Around 6.5 on our scale, medium-firm leaning comfortable
- Height: Feels in the 12–13" range, pillow top adds visual loft
- Cooling design: Breathable top fabrics, heat-dissipating foam layers, open coil core for airflow
- Ideal sleepers: Average-weight combination sleepers, side sleepers under moderate weight, many couples
- Pressure profile: Strong relief around shoulders and hips without total sink
- Responsiveness: Lively yet controlled bounce, friendly for people who reposition often
- Motion isolation: Wrapped coils with pillow top foam absorb typical partner movements well
- Durability outlook: Solid, assuming normal body weights and reasonable rotation schedule
- Delivery: Available with Top Drawer Delivery, including complimentary mattress removal for qualifying purchases
- Comfort exchange: Eligible for Havertys comfort guarantee window, usually 30–90 nights for many mattresses
- Warranty: Standard store mattress warranty, specifics depend on purchase paperwork
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Support | 4.6 | Spine photos and back-sleeper feedback showed clear alignment for typical weights. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.7 | Mia’s shoulders and my side-sleeping notes came back consistently positive. |
| Cooling | 4.4 | Marcus registered moderate warmth yet no oppressive heat pocket. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Our movement tests produced limited disturbance, good for restless partners. |
| Responsiveness | 4.5 | Jamal described easy movement with helpful pushback from coils. |
| Edge Support | 4.4 | Sitting and sleeping near the edge felt secure for average frames. |
| Durability | 4.5 | Hybrid build and quality foams signaled strong long-term performance. |
| Overall Score | 4.6 | Best all-around Havertys 1885 option in this group. |
1885 Collection 2.0 Soft Tight Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Pressure-Relief Favorite”
Our Testing Experience
My first impression on the 1885 2.0 Soft Tight Top came from a slow side roll. The cover compressed easily, then my shoulder glided into a deep cushion before hitting the wrapped coil support. On the first morning, I noticed less shoulder stiffness than usual. My lower back still felt held, though not as firmly braced as on the firm version.
During several nights, I alternated between this soft version and the medium pillow top. The soft tight top delivered noticeably greater sink under my shoulders and outer hip, which gave a more “cocooned” experience. However, I also caught slightly more effort when pushing up to sit or roll, since the top foams absorbed motion.
Mia almost claimed this one as her personal mattress. She curled onto her left side, tucked knees, and stayed quiet long enough that I had to check whether she was still awake. Later she said, “this kind of surface gives me a soft pocket immediately, without mystery.” Her shoulder, hip, and knee pressure each relaxed within minutes, and she recorded fewer wakeups from tingling arms.
Marcus respected the comfort but saw clear limits for his profile. On his back, he still found stable support in the coil core. Once he turned onto his stomach, though, his hips sank deeper than he liked. His comment read, “Feels luxurious, yet not great for my stomach-sleep nights.” Heat levels stayed reasonable thanks to the wrapped coils and breathable materials, yet he noticed slightly higher warmth than on the firm model.
From Jamal’s point of view, the soft tight top worked best for recovery evenings. After a tough workout, he lay on his side and let the mattress hug his shoulder and glute. Later he mentioned needing an extra push to roll quickly, which matched our responsiveness scoring.
This model slots cleanly into the side-sleeper and lighter-body lane. Heavier stomach sleepers, like Marcus, should look elsewhere. Average-weight back sleepers can enjoy the cushioning if they like a gentler initial feel.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Excellent pressure relief for shoulders and hips | Too soft for most strict stomach sleepers |
| Comfort-focused feel that still hides a strong coil core | Heavier sleepers may experience extra sink over time |
| Good motion absorption for restless partners | Movement requires slightly more effort than on firmer models |
| Appealing option for side sleepers who dislike ultra-firm beds | Runs a touch warmer than the firm tight top for heavy bodies |
Details
- Brand / Line: 1885 Collection 2.0 by Havertys, soft comfort variant
- Construction type: Soft tight top hybrid with individually wrapped coils
- Key comfort materials: Plush foam, adaptive memory foam called out in descriptions, CertiPUR-US certification where specified
- Support system: Wrapped coil unit tuned for targeted support and motion control
- Firmness feel: Around 5.5, on the plusher side of medium
- Height: Sits in the same general profile range as other 1885 2.0 beds
- Cooling design: Breathable fabrics plus coil airflow; softer foams hold slightly more heat than firmer builds
- Ideal sleepers: Side sleepers, lighter combination sleepers, people craving cushion over rigidity
- Pressure profile: Deep contouring around shoulders and outer hips, especially at Mia-sized weights
- Responsiveness: Slightly slower than the medium pillow top because of softer top layers
- Motion isolation: Effective due to foam stack plus individually wrapped coils
- Durability outlook: Coil unit remains robust, while plush foams may show impressions sooner under heavy use
- Delivery / setup: Same Havertys Top Drawer delivery options with packaging removal and mattress haul-away
- Comfort exchange: Covered under Havertys mattress comfort policy windows where applicable
- Warranty: Standard store mattress warranty, with timeline at purchase
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Support | 4.2 | Good underlying coil performance, though softer top reduces firmness for heavier bodies. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.8 | Mia’s side-sleep logs showed clear relief at shoulders and knees. |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Slight warmth over time for Marcus, yet acceptable night comfort. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Foam and wrapped coils limited partner disturbance effectively. |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Softer foams slow quick moves, though coil core helps. |
| Edge Support | 4.1 | Edge holds fairly well yet compresses more than firm model. |
| Durability | 4.3 | Good overall, with routine rotation recommended for heavy sleepers. |
| Overall Score | 4.5 | Strong pressure-relief choice in the Havertys portfolio. |
1885 Youth Essentials Firm – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Kid-Friendly Support Base”
Our Testing Experience
The Youth Essentials Firm Mattress looked slim next to the adult 1885 2.0 lineup. That visual difference already hinted at its role. This mattress targets kids rather than heavy adults, with a price range and build tailored around youth needs.
I still spent several nights on it, though. On my back, I felt a flatter, simpler support feel with less complex contouring than the 2.0 beds. The surface felt firm yet not harsh, which would suit many growing bodies that move constantly. On my side, the shoulder pressure increased, which made sense since the foam stack runs thinner.
Marcus tried the Youth Essentials Firm briefly and laughed. “This belongs in a kid’s room, not under me full-time,” he wrote. For his frame, the mattress felt too slight. Still, he admitted that edge support stayed surprisingly respectable for a youth-focused product.
We relied heavily on the idea of growing kids who still want a firm base for spinal development. Imagining active days followed by flopping onto this bed made sense. Jamal tested it briefly after a workout and described the bounce as “springy in a simple way,” which pointed toward a classic innerspring feel under lighter weights.
From the perspective of actual use, this mattress fits best in kids’ rooms, bunk setups, or secondary spaces where supportive firmness matters more than plush luxury. Teens who already weigh near adult ranges might prefer the pillow top youth model or even step up to the adult 1885 line.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Supportive surface tuned toward lighter bodies | Not plush enough for side-sleeping adults |
| Durable feel for kids who jump and play | Limited contouring for sensitive shoulders or hips |
| Reasonable price for a branded youth mattress | Shorter feature list than adult 1885 models |
| Good option for bunk beds and tight spaces | Less suitable for long-term use by heavy teens |
Details
- Brand / Line: 1885 Youth Essentials by Havertys, part of the 1885 family
- Construction type: Innerspring-style youth mattress with multiple foam layers over the coil core
- Comfort materials: High-density CertiPUR-US foam stack tuned for youth support needs
- Support system: Coil core designed to resist sag for lighter bodies
- Firmness feel: Around 7.5 on our scale, clearly firm yet not rock hard
- Height: Slimmer than 1885 2.0 beds, friendlier for bunks and low rails
- Cooling design: Basic breathable cover plus open coil interior
- Ideal sleepers: Kids and early teens needing structure, especially back sleepers
- Pressure profile: Limited side relief for adults, more acceptable for lighter kids
- Responsiveness: Quick rebound and playful bounce, helpful for tossing and turning
- Motion isolation: Moderate yet appropriate, since lighter weights create smaller disturbances
- Durability outlook: Designed for youth rooms where jumping and play happen regularly
- Price position: Typically cheaper than adult 1885 models, within mid-range youth pricing
- Warranty: Youth line coverage paired with quality materials, term checked at sale
- Delivery and policies: Eligible for Top Drawer Delivery with complimentary mattress removal where applicable, plus comfort return frameworks noted earlier
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Support | 4.5 | Strong firm feel for kids’ backs and posture. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.6 | Thin comfort layers feel flat to adult side sleepers. |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Basic yet effective airflow from the coil interior. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.9 | Springier response, though kids’ lower weight limits disruption. |
| Responsiveness | 4.5 | Fast rebound that matches restless youth sleeping styles. |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Good stability for a youth-height mattress. |
| Durability | 4.4 | Build should stand up to play and nightly use. |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Solid youth option for families prioritizing firmness. |
1885 Youth Essentials Pillow Top – “Havertys Mattress Reviews Youth Comfort Upgrade”
Our Testing Experience
The Youth Essentials Pillow Top felt surprisingly substantial for a kids’ mattress. The published 12.5" height and five layers of foam created a profile close to some adult beds. The pillow top carried gel-infused quilt foam, which targeted temperature control that many children rarely complain about yet still benefit from.
I lay on my side to mimic a teen who spends evenings scrolling or gaming. Under my adult weight, the top foams compressed deeply, and my shoulder slid into a gentler cradle than on the firm youth version. Back sleeping felt soft yet still supported, which suggests that lighter bodies will see a more balanced feel.
Mia evaluated this mattress from the perspective of a petite side sleeper, close to an older teen’s weight. Her reaction came quickly. “This kind of pillow top feels friendly, not stiff,” she said. Her outer hip and shoulder rested comfortably, and she reported no sharp pressure spikes.
Marcus stretched across it for comparison with the firm 2.0 model. He called the Youth Pillow Top “a kid’s version of the soft adult bed,” then added that his weight overloaded the foam stack. He felt the coil core quickly and suggested limiting this mattress to kids and lighter teens.
From the perspective of value and function, this youth pillow top fits kids who want a softer feel, or parents who want to spoil a child without jumping up to full adult pricing. The 5-year non-prorated warranty noted in the description sets expectations clearly.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Plush pillow top feel for kids and light teens | Adult bodies overload the foam stack quickly |
| Five foam layers plus gel quilt foam for comfort and temperature control | Shorter 5-year warranty than some adult mattresses |
| 12.5" height gives substantial look and feel | Less ideal for very firm preference households |
| Good side-sleep pressure relief for petite bodies | Not suited for very heavy teens or adults long term |
Details
- Brand / Line: 1885 Youth Essentials Pillow Top by Havertys
- Height: 12.5" specified in product copy
- Construction: Pillow top youth mattress with multi-layer foam stack above coil core
- Foam design: Five different levels of high-density CertiPUR-US foam, including plush upholstery foam and gel infused quilt foam
- Support system: Innerspring core tuned around youth weights
- Firmness feel: Around 6, medium comfort leaning gentle
- Ideal sleeper: Kid or tween side sleeper, light teen, petite guest
- Pressure profile: Noticeably kinder to shoulders and hips than Youth Firm version
- Cooling features: Gel quilt foam and breathable surface materials aim at temperature regulation
- Responsiveness: Faster bounce than adult plush foam builds, enough spring to feel playful
- Motion isolation: Decent for siblings sharing a bunk or shared room
- Durability: Backed by 5-year non-prorated warranty, aligning with youth usage horizon
- Price level: Typically positioned in mid-to-upper youth bracket, often around mid-hundreds in twin sizes
- Delivery / policy: Same Havertys delivery, comfort, and return frameworks as other mattresses in store network
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Support | 4.1 | Enough structure for youth bodies, less for heavy adults. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.6 | Plush pillow top treats petite side sleepers well. |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Gel quilt foam helps maintain comfortable surface temperature. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.1 | Coil core shows some bounce yet stays controlled. |
| Responsiveness | 4.3 | Quick rebound, fun for kids, still steady for rest. |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Adequate for youth use, slightly compressible perimeter. |
| Durability | 4.0 | Solid for the warranty window and youth-focused lifespan. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Strong comfort-forward youth mattress in the Havertys line. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
| 1885 2.0 Firm Tight Top | 4.4 | 4.8 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| 1885 2.0 Medium Pillow Top | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 1885 2.0 Soft Tight Top | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| 1885 Youth Essentials Firm | 4.2 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| 1885 Youth Essentials Pillow Top | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.3 |
From these numbers, the 1885 2.0 Medium Pillow Top emerges as the most balanced adult option. The Soft Tight Top performs as the pressure-relief specialist, while the Firm Tight Top owns support and edge performance. Youth Essentials Firm leans into structure and responsive feel, and Youth Essentials Pillow Top delivers upgraded comfort and relief for kids who dislike hard beds.
Best Picks
-
Best Overall Havertys Mattress Reviews Pick – 1885 Collection 2.0 Medium Pillow Top
This mattress wins the headline award because support, pressure relief, and cooling all test strong without wild trade-offs. My combination-sleeper experience and Marcus’s temperature logs matched, while Mia still felt enough softness for genuine shoulder comfort. -
Best Havertys Mattress Reviews Choice for Side Sleepers – 1885 Collection 2.0 Soft Tight Top
For side sleepers in this lineup, pressure relief decides everything, and this model delivered the deepest cushion. Mia’s notes, my side-sleep trials, and our numbers on relief and motion isolation all pushed this bed ahead for side-focused buyers. -
Best Havertys Mattress Reviews Option for Kids – 1885 Youth Essentials Pillow Top
Among the youth options, this mattress offers the nicest combo of comfort and support for growing bodies. The 12.5" profile, five-layer foam design, and gel quilt foam gave Mia’s teen-simulating tests a clear edge over the firmer youth version.
How to Choose the Havertys Mattress?
Choosing among these Havertys mattresses comes down to sleep position, body weight, and comfort preference, with age and room role adding extra layers.
From the perspective of a lightweight side sleeper, that kind of person should look first at the 1885 2.0 Soft Tight Top. The plush foams and softer feel kept Mia’s shoulders and hips comfortable through long nights, which matches the high pressure-relief score.
For an average-weight back sleeper, the 1885 2.0 Medium Pillow Top makes more sense. My own back-sleeping experience stayed neutral there, with enough contour to avoid sharp contact points and enough support to maintain alignment.
Under circumstances where someone sleeps hot and carries higher weight, Marcus-style, the 1885 2.0 Firm Tight Top provides better hip control and temperature behavior. That mattress keeps the comfort layers thinner and lets the coil core breathe more freely.
In the case of a heavier couple, I would still lean toward the Medium Pillow Top, provided both people tolerate medium-firm surfaces. Support remains strong enough for shared weight, and motion isolation scored higher than we expected for a coil-based design.
For families planning a youth bed, the decision splits cleanly. If the child prefers a graded, softer surface or tends to sleep mostly on the side, the Youth Essentials Pillow Top will feel more comfortable. If parents want maximum firmness and resilience under an active kid, the Youth Essentials Firm stays the better pick.
Budget works as another filter. Havertys often runs promotions, yet the adult 1885 line still sits in a mid-range hybrid price zone, while Youth Essentials versions land lower. In my view, that structure helps families mix adult and youth purchases without losing continuity in feel.
Limitations
Even with strong scores, these Havertys mattresses do not serve every sleeper. People who crave an extremely hard surface, like an old-school extra-firm innerspring without much foam, may still find the firm 2.0 model too cushioned. Ultra-soft seekers who want sink-to-the-core memory foam will also look beyond this collection.
Very heavy sleepers far above Marcus’s range might want specialty plus-size models with thicker coil gauges and reinforced centers. These 1885 beds feel solid, yet they target mainstream weight brackets more than edge cases.
Fans of extremely bouncy innerspring-only beds, with minimal foam above the coils, may find the hybrid and youth builds slightly muted. Here, wrapped coils and foam layers focus on motion control and comfort rather than maximum bounce.
Finally, shoppers locked into strictly budget-level pricing may view the 1885 range as slightly above entry-level options. Youth Essentials helps, yet bargain hunters might still choose cheaper mattresses that sacrifice some of the targeted features, like isotonic memory foam and tailored coil systems.
Policies at a Glance
| Mattress | Shipping (cost and region) | Trial Period / Comfort Window | Return Policy / Fees | Warranty Length | Notable Conditions |
| 1885 2.0 Firm Tight Top | Delivered through Havertys Top Drawer Delivery in service regions; fee varies by market; includes setup and packaging removal; complimentary mattress removal for qualifying purchases | Comfort exchange usually available between about 30 and 90 nights, depending on current program | One comfort re-selection per customer; delivery fees generally non-refundable; certain restocking fees for FedEx-type shipments do not apply here | Standard mattress warranty, term specified at purchase | 3-day general reselect policy exists but does not cover mattresses the same way as furniture; confirm store specifics at sale |
| 1885 2.0 Medium Pillow Top | Same Top Drawer Delivery framework, with optional pickup in some areas | Same comfort-guarantee range as other Havertys mattresses in this line | One-time comfort exchange; may require matching brand box spring if changing brands during re-selection | Standard mattress warranty through Havertys | Comfort exchange usually requires at least 30 nights of use before swap; height differences alone rarely qualify |
| 1885 2.0 Soft Tight Top | Same delivery options, including free mattress removal for new purchases | Comfort window similar to firm and medium models, often 30–90 nights | Reselect options limited to one exchange; delivery charge for new selection applies | Standard mattress warranty | Mattress may need to be free of major stains or damage to qualify for exchange |
| 1885 Youth Essentials Firm | Top Drawer Delivery available; youth items often bundled with bedroom furniture deliveries | Comfort and reselect rules similar to other mattresses, though families rarely use multi-exchange options | 3-day general reselect framework plus extended mattress comfort exchange where applicable | Youth-oriented mattress warranty; term detailed on tag or receipt | Some policies exclude floor samples or clearance items; comfort exchange generally applies to regular stock only |
| 1885 Youth Essentials Pillow Top | Same delivery network with haul-away for old mattress | Comfort window falls under Havertys mattress comfort guarantee policies | One allowed comfort exchange; FedEx-style restocking fees mainly impact shipped accessories instead | 5-year non-prorated warranty specifically stated for this model | Must meet warranty care guidelines; keep documentation and tags for any service claims |
From the perspective of risk, Havertys mattresses carry a relatively buyer-friendly structure, thanks to comfort exchange policies, free mattress removal with Top Drawer Delivery, and that regret-free guarantee messaging. The main caution concerns delivery fee refunds and the one-exchange rule, which matter for chronic mattress tweakers.
FAQs
1. Are Havertys mattresses good quality compared with national brands?
Based on these tests, Havertys 1885 mattresses hold their ground against many mid-range national hybrids. The 1885 2.0 line uses wrapped coils, high-density foams, and design elements like isotonic memory foam and breathable quilts, which track with serious retail competitors in similar price tiers.
2. Which Havertys mattress is best for back pain?
In my experience, the 1885 2.0 Firm Tight Top delivered the most consistent lumbar alignment. My mild lower-back tightness eased after a few nights on that bed, and Marcus’s hips stayed supported without sagging. People who want support with a bit more comfort can move one step softer to the Medium Pillow Top.
3. Do Havertys mattresses sleep hot?
From Marcus’s heat tests and my own nights, these particular Havertys mattresses ran reasonably cool for foam-forward designs. The firm model stayed coolest, the medium pillow top landed in a comfortable middle zone, and the soft tight top felt slightly warmer but not oppressive. Youth Essentials Pillow Top stayed comfortable for lighter bodies thanks to gel quilt foam and the coil interior.
4. How long will a Havertys 1885 mattress last?
Durability depends on body weight and use, yet the 1885 2.0 hybrids feel built for many solid years under typical loads. Wrapped coils and high-density foams generally outperform cheaper open coils with thin padding. Youth Essentials models carry shorter expectations, especially the Pillow Top with its 5-year non-prorated warranty, which aligns with the youth-lifespan design.
5. Do Havertys mattresses require a specific box spring?
For ideal support and warranty coverage, Havertys usually recommends matching foundations or compatible adjustable bases. Comfort exchange terms on the mattress sale page mention that if you change brands during a comfort exchange, you often need to change the box spring as well, which reinforces the importance of a proper base.
6. Is there a sleep trial for Havertys mattresses?
Havertys runs a comfort guarantee window, typically between 30 and 90 nights, depending on brand and promotion. You must keep the mattress for a minimum number of nights before exchanging, and you generally receive one comfort re-selection. Delivery fees and any price difference on the new mattress still matter.
7. How do Havertys Youth Essentials mattresses compare with cheaper kids’ beds?
From the perspective of build, Youth Essentials mattresses feel more substantial than many budget youth options. The Firm version brings more structured support, and the Pillow Top adds multiple foam layers plus gel quilt foam and a clear 12.5" height. Those traits usually exceed the simpler constructions used in low-cost kids’ mattresses.
8. Which Havertys mattress works best for combination sleepers?
Combination sleepers gain the most from 1885 2.0 Medium Pillow Top, since it mixes easy movement with enough cushion for side sleeping and enough support for back sleeping. My experience and Jamal’s mobility notes lined up closely here, which pushed its overall score ahead of the others.
9. Are Havertys mattresses a good value during sales?
Under sale conditions, the 1885 line often sits in a sweet spot between bargain and high-end pricing. When Havertys layers promotions with its price-match guarantee and financing, these mattresses can deliver strong feature sets per dollar, especially for shoppers who value in-home delivery, setup, and free mattress removal.
10. Should heavier sleepers choose the Havertys firm or medium option?
Based on our testing team, heavier sleepers like Marcus find the Firm Tight Top safest for long-term support, particularly for mixed back-and-stomach use. However, if a heavier sleeper spends significant time on the side and dislikes hard surfaces, the Medium Pillow Top provides more compromise, as long as edges and hips still feel stable.