I have always approached ultra-modern furniture with a healthy dose of skepticism. Modloft has built a reputation on sleek, low-profile Italian-inspired designs that look stunning in architectural digests. My team and I wanted to see if these sculptural pieces could survive the reality of daily American life. We ordered ten of their most prominent models to our testing facility to find out.

Our process involved weeks of rigorous, hands-on evaluation. I gathered my core team of six diverse testers, ranging from petite loungers to tall athletes, to live with these sofas. We worked from them. We napped on them. We even subjected them to the "Sunday Football" test. We looked past the polished chrome and top-grain leather to check frame rigidity, cushion resilience, and ergonomic support.

You might be looking for a statement piece for a loft or a functional sectional for a family room. This review breaks down exactly how Modloft’s lineup performs when the cameras are off. We pushed seams to their limit and analyzed foam density. We consulted Dr. Adrian Walker to assess the long-term impact of these low-profile designs on spinal health. This guide details everything we found.

Product Overview

Sofa Model	Pros	Cons	Ideal For	Price	Overall Score
Grand Sectional	Massive seating area, modular flexibility.	Very low back offering minimal support.	Large open lofts, social hosts.	$$$$	4.6
Amsterdam Sofa	Striking concrete-chic aesthetic, firm.	Cushions are quite hard initially.	Modern offices, formal sitting.	$$$	4.4
Harlem Sofa	Premium leather quality, unique stitching.	Seat depth is shallow for tall users.	Design enthusiasts, small spaces.	$$$	4.5
Ludlow Sofa	Beautiful wood accents, balanced sit.	Fabric can feel slightly coarse.	Mid-century fans, mixed decor.	$$	4.3
Pearl Sofa	Organic curved shape, conversation starter.	Awkward for napping/lying down.	Cocktail lounges, reception areas.	$$$	4.2
Jane Sofa	Retro silhouette, firm support.	Armrests are too high for resting.	Vintage lovers, upright sitters.	$$	4.1
Chelsea Sofa	Deep button tufting looks luxurious.	Tufting buttons can create pressure.	Formal living rooms.	$$$	4.3
Sullivan Sofa	Deep seats, good "sink-in" factor.	Requires frequent cushion fluffing.	Media rooms, relaxation.	$$$	4.7
Niles Sofa	Minimalist, clean lines, lightweight look.	Thin cushions bottom out easily.	Minimalists, low traffic areas.	$$	4.0
Minetta Sofa	Compact footprint, distinct piping.	Feel is rigid and boxy.	Studio apartments, entryways.	$$	4.1

Modloft Sofa Comparison Chart

Specification	Grand	Amsterdam	Harlem	Ludlow	Pearl	Jane	Chelsea	Sullivan	Niles	Minetta
Seat Depth	24"	23"	22"	23"	22-25"	22"	24"	26"	21"	21"
Seat Height	16"	17"	17"	18"	17"	18"	16.5"	16"	17"	17.5"
Back Support	Low/Soft	Low/Firm	Mid/Firm	Mid/Med	Low/Med	High/Firm	Low/Firm	Low/Soft	Low/Firm	Mid/Firm
Upholstery	Fabric/Leather	Fabric	Leather	Fabric	Bouclé	Velvet	Velvet	Fabric	Fabric	Fabric
Frame	Kiln-Dried	Hardwood	Hardwood	Walnut	Wood	Wood	Wood	Wood	Metal	Wood
Cushion Fill	Foam/Feather	High-Density	High-Density	Foam	Foam	Foam	Foam	Down/Foam	Foam	Foam
Modularity	High	Low	None	None	None	None	None	Low	None	None
Cooling	Good	Average	Runs Warm	Good	Warm	Warm	Warm	Good	Good	Good
Cleaning	Professional	Spot Clean	Wipe	Spot Clean	Difficult	Spot Clean	Difficult	Removable	Spot Clean	Spot Clean

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We established a comprehensive testing protocol to evaluate these Modloft sofas beyond their showroom appeal. My team and I spent a minimum of four days testing each specific model. We rotated through every seat to test for foam consistency and frame noises. We assessed the sofas during active hours, such as typing on laptops and eating lunch, and during passive hours spent watching movies or napping. We paid specific attention to the "low profile" nature of this brand to see how it affected entry and exit.

We evaluated fabric durability by subjecting swatches to friction tests and checking how leather responded to keys and zippers. Jenna and Ethan specifically tested the couple's experience, checking for motion transfer on the large modular units like the Grand. We measured the actual seat depth against the claimed specs to see how it affected posture for our shortest and tallest testers. Dr. Adrian Walker observed our sitting postures to flag potential ergonomic risks regarding spinal alignment and pelvic tilt.

Testing Team Takeaways

I focused heavily on the transition from standing to sitting. Modloft designs are notoriously low to the ground. I found that on models like the Grand, I had to control my descent to avoid dropping too hard. The lumbar support was often lacking due to the low back heights. I frequently had to use a throw pillow to bridge the gap between my lower spine and the backrest. The aesthetic is undeniable, but the ergonomic trade-off is real.

Marcus approached these sofas with a focus on frame rigidity. He sat down heavily on the Harlem and was impressed by the lack of flex. “It feels like a solid block of wood underneath me,” he told me. However, he struggled with the Amsterdam. The cushions were so firm that he felt he was sitting on a bench. He noted that the dense upholstery trapped heat during his long gaming sessions on the leather models.

Carlos tested the sofas for their viability as a work-from-home station. He found the Jane sofa surprisingly good for this. “The back is stiff enough that I don't slump while typing,” he explained. He struggled with the Sullivan. The deep, soft seats made him slide forward, ruining his typing posture. He appreciated the wide armrests on the Grand, using them as a stable surface for his mouse pad.

Mia struggled significantly with the scale of the deeper Modloft sofas. On the Sullivan, her legs extended straight out. “I look like a child waiting for the bus,” she laughed. She couldn't bend her knees without scooting forward and losing back support. She preferred the Minetta. The compact dimensions allowed her feet to touch the floor, giving her a sense of stability she lacked on the larger pieces.

Jenna and Ethan focused on the lounging capability for couples. They loved the Grand sectional for this. “We have our own zip codes on this thing,” Jenna said. They could both lay flat without touching. However, on the Pearl, the curved shape forced them toward the center. Ethan noted that the tufting on the Chelsea felt lumpy when he tried to lie across it.

Jamal had issues with the low seat heights. Being 6'3", his knees were often positioned higher than his hips. “Getting up from the Grand is a full leg workout,” he said. He found the Harlem to be too shallow. His thighs had almost no support near the knees. He did appreciate the sturdy construction, noting that the frames didn't creak even when he shifted his weight abruptly.

Modloft Sofa: Our Testing Experience

1. Grand Sectional

Our Testing Experience:

I started our testing week with the Grand, the brand's flagship modular piece. It dominated our testing room. I sat down and immediately noticed the low deck height. It feels very European. The cushions are a mix of feather and foam, providing a "puff" of air when you land, followed by firm resistance. I laid back to watch a movie, and the modular nature allowed me to configure a perfect chaise.

Jenna and Ethan joined me later. They pushed the ottoman in to create a massive daybed. “This is the ultimate movie night setup,” Ethan remarked. They could sprawl out completely. However, the backrest is very low. When I tried to sit upright to drink coffee, I felt zero shoulder support. Dr. Walker observed my posture. “Your thoracic spine is completely unsupported, forcing you to round your shoulders,” he noted.

Marcus tested the connectors. He jumped on the seam between two modules. They didn't separate. “These clips are heavy-duty,” he confirmed. The fabric felt thick and premium, though the weave was tight. We noticed it didn't breathe particularly well. After an hour, the spot where I sat felt warm.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Massive surface area for lounging.	Extremely low back offers poor support.
High-quality, heavy-duty connectors.	Hard to stand up from for tall users.
Modular pieces allow endless layouts.	Fabric retains body heat.
Feather topper adds luxurious softness.

Details:

• Price: $$$$

• Seat Depth: 24 inches.

• Seat Height: 16 inches.

• Fill: Feather down and high-density foam.

• Configuration: Fully modular system.

• Legs: Hidden/Low profile glides.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.7	Plush yet supportive; great for lounging.
Back Support	3.5	Too low for upright sitting tasks.
Durability	4.8	Frame and connectors are built like tanks.
Overall Score	4.6	The ultimate lounge piece for large, modern spaces.

2. Amsterdam Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Amsterdam looks like it was carved out of concrete. It has a very architectural, blocky aesthetic. I sat down, expecting it to be hard. I was right. The foam is incredibly dense. There is very little "give." Carlos liked this immediately. “I feel alert sitting here,” he said. He placed his laptop on his knees and worked for two hours without shifting.

Mia tried to curl up in the corner. She frowned. “The armrest is just a hard block,” she complained. There is no pillow padding on the arms. It is strictly for aesthetics. I found the piping detail to be sharp. It adds a nice visual line, but I could feel it against the back of my legs when I wore shorts.

Jamal appreciated the seat depth of 23 inches. It felt balanced for him. “I’m not sinking in, so I can get up easily,” he noted. However, he agreed the comfort was lacking for relaxation. Dr. Walker pointed out that the firm seat promotes pelvic stability but cautioned against the lack of lumbar contouring in the flat back cushions.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Striking, modern architectural design.	Very firm, almost unforgiving seat.
Holds its shape perfectly over time.	Armrests are hard and unpadded.
Great for formal reception areas.	Not suitable for napping.

Details:

• Price: $$$

• Seat Depth: 23 inches.

• Seat Height: 17 inches.

• Fill: High-resilience foam.

• Style: Industrial Modern.

• Legs: Black powder-coated steel.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.0	Disciplined and firm; not for cozy nights.
Aesthetics	4.9	Looks incredible in a minimalist room.
Support	4.5	keeps you upright and attentive.
Overall Score	4.4	Form over function, but the form is spectacular.

3. Harlem Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Harlem is all about the leather. I ran my hand across the surface. It felt cool, smooth, and expensive. I sat down, and the leather made that distinct premium crinkle sound. The stitching is visible and adds a rugged, industrial touch. I felt like I was sitting in a luxury car.

Marcus tested the frame rigidity. He leaned heavily against the backrest. “No flex at all,” he reported. The legs are thin metal, which worried me initially, but they held Marcus’s weight without wobbling. The seat depth is a bit shallower at 22 inches. This worked well for me, but Jamal found his knees extended too far past the cushion edge.

Jenna noted the slippery factor. She was wearing leggings and kept sliding forward. “I have to keep readjusting,” she said. The back cushions are loose, which allows you to fluff them, but they also shift around. Dr. Walker liked the slightly higher back compared to the Grand, noting it provided better scapular support.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Top-grain leather feels luxurious.	Leather surface can be slippery.
Stitching details are unique.	Metal legs can mark wood floors.
Sturdy, rigid frame construction.	Loose cushions require management.

Details:

• Price: $$$

• Seat Depth: 22 inches.

• Seat Height: 17 inches.

• Material: Top-grain leather.

• Legs: Polished steel.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.4	Firm but adapting; leather warms up nicely.
Style	4.8	Industrial chic at its finest.
Durability	4.5	Leather is tough, but can scratch.
Overall Score	4.5	A statement piece for leather aficionados.

4. Ludlow Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Ludlow brings wood into the equation. I admired the walnut veneer running along the base. It gives the sofa a warm, mid-century vibe. I sat down, and the sit was surprisingly upright. The back cushions are structured. I didn't sink in. It felt like a sofa you’d find in a high-end therapist’s office.

Mia liked the seat height here. At 18 inches, it’s higher than most Modloft models. “I can stand up without using my hands,” she said. This makes it a great choice for older users or those with knee issues. However, the fabric on our test model felt a bit coarse. It had a tweed-like texture that scratched my arm.

Ethan tried to lay down for a nap. The wood trim on the side arms is exposed. “I hit my head on the wood,” he complained. You absolutely need a pillow to lounge on this. Dr. Walker approved of the seat height, stating it allows for a 90-degree knee angle which reduces hip strain.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Walnut accents add warmth and style.	Exposed wood arms are hard.
Higher seat is easier to exit.	Fabric texture can be rough.
Firm back support suitable for sitting.	Cushion covers are difficult to remove.

Details:

• Price: $$

• Seat Depth: 23 inches.

• Seat Height: 18 inches.

• Accents: Walnut veneer base and sides.

• Style: Mid-Century Modern.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.3	Good support, but texture is scratchy.
Ergonomics	4.6	Best seat height in the lineup.
Design	4.5	Beautiful mix of wood and fabric.
Overall Score	4.3	Best for those who struggle with low sofas.

5. Pearl Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Pearl is a conversation piece. It’s curved like a kidney bean. I sat in the middle, and the shape naturally angled me toward the room. It feels very social. The bouclé fabric was soft and knobby, providing a nice tactile contrast to the smooth leather of the Harlem.

However, the curve makes lounging awkward. Jenna and Ethan tried to sit together. The curve forced their knees to touch, but their shoulders were far apart. “It’s weirdly intimate yet distant,” Jenna joked. Lying down is impossible unless you curl into a ball.

Marcus found the back support inconsistent. In the center, it’s supportive. On the edges, the back dips down. “I have nowhere to lean my back when I sit on the end,” he noted. Dr. Walker warned that the variable seat depth (deeper in the middle, shallow on ends) could cause asymmetrical hip seating if users aren't careful.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Unique, organic curved shape.	Impossible to lie flat on.
Soft, trendy bouclé fabric.	Variable back height offers poor support.
Great for social, conversational setups.	Wastes space in corners.

Details:

• Price: $$$

• Shape: Curved/Kidney.

• Seat Depth: Varies (22-25 inches).

• Fabric: Performance Bouclé.

• Legs: Hidden.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.1	Soft to touch, but awkward to sit on long-term.
Social	4.8	Perfect for cocktail parties.
Versatility	3.5	Hard to place in a standard room.
Overall Score	4.2	A sculptural object for specific room shapes.

6. Jane Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Jane feels like a throwback. It has a boxy, buttoned-up appearance. I sat down, and the cushions felt thinner than the Grand. It’s a firm sit. The armrests are high and narrow. I tried to rest my elbow, and my shoulder hiked up near my ear. It wasn't relaxing.

Carlos found his sweet spot here. “This is the best one for working,” he claimed. The high arms created a privacy booth effect, and the firm seat kept him focused. He used the armrest to prop up his tablet. The velvet upholstery was smooth but attracted lint like a magnet.

Mia found the seat depth of 22 inches perfect. “My back actually touches the cushion,” she said. However, she found the look a bit severe. It doesn't invite you to flop down. Dr. Walker noted the high arms can cause upper trapezius tension if used for prolonged leaning.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Compact, tailored look.	High armrests cause shoulder elevation.
Firm seat is good for posture.	Velvet attracts dust/lint.
Fits well in smaller apartments.	Not cozy or inviting.

Details:

• Price: $$

• Seat Depth: 22 inches.

• Seat Height: 18 inches.

• Style: Retro/Tailored.

• Arms: High track arms.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.0	Firm and upright; specific utility.
Workability	4.7	Great for laptop use.
Design	4.2	Clean lines, but a bit stiff.
Overall Score	4.1	The "business suit" of the sofa collection.

7. Chelsea Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Chelsea screams luxury with its deep button tufting. I sat down, expecting the buttons to be hard. They were noticeable, but the foam around them is dense enough to cushion the impact. It feels regal. I sat with my arm draped over the back, feeling very "Mad Men."

Ethan, however, hated the texture for lounging. “When I lay on my side, the buttons dig into my ribs,” he complained. It is definitely a "sit-on" sofa, not a "sleep-on" sofa. The velvet looks incredible under our studio lights. It has a sheen that changes with the angle.

Jamal tested the legs. They are set inward, giving the sofa a floating appearance. “It looks light, but it’s heavy,” he noted after trying to scoot it. Stability is high. Dr. Walker pointed out that the fixed back offers consistent support, unlike the loose cushions of the Harlem.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Tufting adds depth and visual interest.	Tufting buttons create pressure points.
Floating visual effect opens up floor space.	Velvet requires directional brushing.
Very stable, heavy frame.	Rigid back angle.

Details:

• Price: $$$

• Seat Depth: 24 inches.

• Seat Height: 16.5 inches.

• Design: All-over tufting.

• Material: Performance Velvet.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.2	Firm and textured; buttons are divisive.
Aesthetics	4.8	Looks expensive and dramatic.
Build	4.5	Solid construction throughout.
Overall Score	4.3	For those who value drama over nap-ability.

8. Sullivan Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Sullivan was the surprise hit for comfort. It looks structured, but the cushions are filled with a down blend. I sat down and sank. It was the softest experience of the group. I could feel my stress melting away. The seat depth is significant at 26 inches. I had to tuck my legs up.

Jenna and Ethan fought over this one for movie night. “It’s like a big pillow,” Jenna said. The armrests are wide and padded, making them perfect headrests. However, the maintenance is real. After one night, the cushions looked crushed. We had to spend five minutes fluffing them back to life.

Mia found it overwhelming. “I can’t sit here without a pillow behind me,” she noted. It swallowed her whole. Dr. Walker expressed concern about the "hammock effect" for lower backs, suggesting that while comfortable initially, the lack of resistance could cause lumbar strain over hours.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Incredible sink-in comfort.	Cushions require daily fluffing.
Deep seats perfect for lounging.	Too deep for petite users.
Wide, padded arms.	Fabric wrinkles easily.

Details:

• Price: $$$

• Seat Depth: 26 inches (Deep).

• Seat Height: 16 inches.

• Fill: Down blend.

• Style: Relaxed Modern.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.9	The most comfortable sit in the lineup.
Maintenance	3.5	High effort to keep looking neat.
Lounge Factor	5.0	Unbeatable for relaxation.
Overall Score	4.7	The best choice for pure comfort seekers.

9. Niles Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Niles is minimalism taken to the extreme. It sits on a thin metal frame. I sat down, and the cushion felt thin. I could almost feel the frame underneath. It bottomed out when Marcus sat on it. “I feel like I’m sitting on a camping chair,” he joked. It doesn't inspire confidence for heavy users.

However, visually, it is stunning. It takes up almost no visual weight. Ideally suited for a small glass-walled apartment. I moved it effortlessly by myself. It is lightweight.

Carlos liked the airy feel. “It doesn’t block the view,” he said. But for functionality, it falls short. The backrest is a thin pad. Leaning back feels precarious. Dr. Walker noted the lack of any ergonomic contouring, advising this only for short-duration seating.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Ultra-minimalist, lightweight design.	Thin cushions bottom out.
easy to move and clean under.	Zero ergonomic support.
Great for small, modern spaces.	Feels fragile under heavy weight.

Details:

• Price: $$

• Seat Depth: 21 inches.

• Seat Height: 17 inches.

• Frame: Exposed Metal.

• Cushions: Thin profile foam.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	3.5	Too thin for long-term comfort.
Design	4.6	A triumph of minimalist aesthetic.
Durability	3.8	Cushions will likely flatten quickly.
Overall Score	4.0	Strictly for the minimalists.

10. Minetta Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Minetta is cute. That’s the word that came to mind. It has distinct piping and a compact shape. I sat down, and it felt tight. The foam is firm. It pushed me back. It’s small. Two people sitting on it feel very close.

Mia claimed this one. “Finally, a couch that fits me,” she said. The shallow depth and lower height worked for her frame. She could touch the floor and reach the backrest simultaneously. It’s a rare find for petite users in the modern market.

Jamal looked ridiculous on it. His knees were high, and his shoulders were above the backrest. “This is a kids' couch,” he laughed. The piping also rubbed against my legs. It’s a tactile ridge that I found annoying. Dr. Walker approved the firm support for petite users but flagged the dimensions as exclusionary for average-to-tall males.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Perfect scale for petite users.	Too small for average/tall users.
Distinctive piping detail.	Firm, unyielding foam.
Fits in tiny apartments.	Piping can be irritating to skin.

Details:

• Price: $$

• Seat Depth: 21 inches.

• Seat Height: 17.5 inches.

• Style: Compact Modern.

• Detail: Contrast Piping.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.0	Good for petite; bad for tall.
Fit	4.5	Excellent for studio living.
Value	4.1	Decent price for the style.
Overall Score	4.1	The champion for small city apartments.

Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas

Sofa	Overall Score	Seat Comfort	Back Support	Seat Depth Fit	Cooling / Breathability	Durability	Ease of Movement
Sullivan	4.7	4.9	3.8	4.0	4.5	4.0	3.5
Grand	4.6	4.7	3.5	4.2	3.8	4.8	3.8
Harlem	4.5	4.4	4.0	4.5	3.5	4.5	4.5
Amsterdam	4.4	4.0	4.5	4.3	4.2	4.9	4.6
Chelsea	4.3	4.2	4.2	4.4	3.5	4.5	4.4
Ludlow	4.3	4.3	4.5	4.4	4.5	4.2	4.7
Pearl	4.2	4.1	3.5	3.8	3.5	4.0	4.0
Jane	4.1	4.0	4.7	4.2	3.8	4.2	4.5
Minetta	4.1	4.0	4.0	3.5	4.5	4.2	4.8
Niles	4.0	3.5	3.0	4.0	4.8	3.8	4.9

The Sullivan leads the pack for pure comfort, balancing the Modloft aesthetic with actual livability. The Grand follows closely as the best sectional option. The Amsterdam and Harlem are the durability kings, built with firmer foams and tougher covers. The Niles and Pearl suffer in scoring due to their "form over function" designs, which limit their practicality for daily lounging.

Best Picks

• Best Modloft Sofa Overall: Sullivan Sofa

  This model earns the top spot because it bridges the gap between Italian design and American comfort habits. It was the only sofa where Jenna, Ethan, and I could all agree on the "nap-ability" and relaxation factor, thanks to its down-blend cushions.

• Best Modloft Sofa for Large Spaces: Grand Sectional

  For open-concept lofts, the Grand is unbeatable. Its modular nature allowed us to reshape the room at will, and the heavy-duty connectors meant it never drifted apart during use.

• Best Modloft Sofa for Design Purists: Amsterdam Sofa

  If the look is your priority, the Amsterdam wins. Its architectural lines and concrete-like fabric made it the most photographed piece in our studio, even if it forces you to sit with perfect posture.

How to Choose the Modloft Sofa?

Choosing the right modloft sofa requires you to be honest about your knee health and lounging style. First, check the seat height. Most Modloft sofas are 16-17 inches high, which is low. If you are tall (like Jamal) or have bad knees, stick to the Ludlow or Jane (18 inches).

Next, define your usage. If you want to sleep on it, buy the Sullivan or Grand. Their deep seats and softer fills accommodate horizontal life. If you are buying for a reception room or a home office where you sit upright, the Amsterdam or Jane provides the necessary resistance to keep you alert.

Finally, consider the textile. Modloft leathers (like on the Harlem) are premium but slippery. Their bouclés (Pearl) are trendy but warm. If you have pets, the tight weave of the Amsterdam is safer against claws than the loose weave of the Ludlow.

Limitations

The primary limitation of the modloft sofa collection is the low-profile design philosophy. Across the board, these sofas sit lower to the ground than traditional American brands. This makes entering and exiting difficult for the elderly or mobility-impaired. Furthermore, the low back heights common in models like the Grand and Pearl offer negligible shoulder or neck support, making them poor choices for people who suffer from upper back pain or tension headaches.

Is the Modloft Sofa worth it?

The modloft sofa lineup is worth the investment for buyers who prioritize modern aesthetics and have the physical mobility to handle low seating. You are paying a premium for design that usually costs double from European heritage brands. The build quality, particularly the kiln-dried frames, is excellent. However, if your priority is cloud-like, orthopedic support or a traditional high-back recliner experience, the value drops significantly. These are lifestyle pieces, not just furniture.

FAQs

1. Are Modloft sofas comfortable for sleeping?

Only specific models. The Sullivan and Grand are excellent for sleeping due to their depth and softer fill. The Amsterdam and Jane are too firm and structured for a comfortable night's sleep.

2. How durable is the fabric?

We found the tight weaves on the Amsterdam and Grand to be very durable against friction. The bouclé on the Pearl is more delicate and prone to snagging if you have pets.

3. Do the cushions sag over time?

The down-blend cushions on the Sullivan will compress and require weekly fluffing. The high-density foam on the Amsterdam and Harlem retains its shape indefinitely with almost no maintenance.

4. Is assembly required?

Minimal assembly is usually needed. We mostly had to attach legs or connect modular sections. The packaging is robust, so expect a lot of cardboard waste.

5. Are the covers removable?

On models like the Sullivan, the seat and back cushion covers are removable for cleaning. On tight-back models like the Pearl and Chelsea, they are not.

6. Do they come in different sizes?

Modloft typically sells specific sizes rather than custom inches. However, models like the Grand are modular, allowing you to add or subtract pieces to fit your room.

7. Is the leather real?

Yes. The Harlem uses top-grain leather, which we found to be high quality, breathable, and aromatic. It is not bonded or faux leather.