Macy's is a massive player in the American furniture market. I wanted to see if their ubiquity translates to actual quality. Many buyers see these sofas in ads every week. My goal was to determine if they hold up to daily life. We did not test these in a showroom for five minutes.
I am Chris Miller, and I led this evaluation. My team and I brought these sofas into a real living environment. We lived with them. We ate on them. We napped on them. We have Marcus, Carlos, Mia, Jenna, Jamal, and Ethan on the team. We also have Dr. Adrian Walker advising on ergonomics.
Our testing process was rigorous and honest. We looked for sagging cushions and loose threads. We checked how fabrics feel against the skin. We measured seat depths to see who fits best. This is what we found after weeks of testing.
Product Overview
| Sofa Model | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
| Radley 5-Piece Fabric Sectional | Very comfortable texture, modular | Cushions lose shape easily | Families, casual lounging | Mid-Range | 4.3 |
| Jollene 113" 2-Piece Sectional | Stylish mid-century look, firm | Tufting traps crumbs, stiff | Style-conscious buyers | Mid-Range | 4.1 |
| Randa 79" Fabric Sofa | Compact, very affordable | Shallow seat, feels lighter | Apartments, budgets | Budget | 3.8 |
| Virton 88" Leather Sofa | Sleek leather, easy cleaning | Slippery surface, firm seat | Modern spaces, pets | High | 4.2 |
| Nevio 3-Piece Leather Sectional | Power reclining, high back | Bulky visual footprint | Movie rooms, comfort seekers | High | 4.4 |
| Avenell 4-Piece Leather Sectional | Adjustable headrests, premium feel | Expensive, complex assembly | Tech lovers, luxury buyers | High | 4.5 |
| Boxberg 89" Fabric Sofa | Classic design, rolled arms | Fabric can pill, average foam | Traditional homes | Mid-Range | 4.0 |
| Ladlow 90" Fabric Sofa | Modern profile, sturdy frame | Low back, very firm | Minimalists, waiting rooms | Mid-Range | 3.9 |
Macy's Sofa Comparison Chart
| Specification | Radley | Jollene | Randa | Virton | Nevio | Avenell | Boxberg | Ladlow |
| Width | 113" x 113" | 113" | 79" | 88" | 117" | 131" | 89" | 90" |
| Seat Depth | 24" | 22" | 20" | 22" | 23" | 23" | 22" | 24" |
| Seat Height | 19" | 19" | 19" | 18" | 20" | 20" | 19" | 18" |
| Firmness | Soft/Plush | Firm | Medium | Firm | Medium | Medium-Firm | Medium | Firm |
| Back Support | Loose Pillow | Tufted Fixed | Fixed | Fixed Cushion | High/Reclining | Adjustable | Loose Cushion | Low Fixed |
| Material | Polyester | Polyester | Polyester | Top Grain Leather | Leather/Match | Leather | Polyester | Polyester |
| Configuration | Modular | L-Shape | Sofa | Sofa | Reclining Sectional | Reclining Sectional | Sofa | Sofa |
| Best Feature | Texture | Style | Price | Sleekness | Comfort | Adjustability | Classic Look | Modern Lines |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We established a strict protocol for these Macy's sofas. My team and I rotated through each model for five days. We specifically tested for long-term comfort. I sat on each sofa for at least three consecutive hours. This simulated a long movie night or a work session.
We tested fabric durability and tactile feel. Mia checked for scratchiness against bare skin. Marcus tested heat retention during long gaming sessions. We looked at stain resistance. We applied water and coffee to the fabric samples. We checked how easily pet hair brushed off.
We evaluated structural integrity. Jamal and Marcus performed "drop tests" to check frame suspension. We listened for squeaks. Jenna and Ethan tested motion transfer. They sat together to see if movement disturbed the other person. Dr. Walker analyzed our posture notes. He looked for lumbar support deficiencies.
Testing Team Takeaways
I found the Macy's lineup to be generally "safe." They prioritize mass appeal over niche ergonomics. The Radley stands out for texture. It feels like a warm towel. However, I noticed the back cushions sag quickly. I had to fluff them constantly. The leather models impressed me with their finish.
Marcus Reed focused on the foam density. This Radley seat sinks too much, he noted. He felt trapped in the corner. He preferred the firmness of the Jollene. But he hated the heat. The polyester on the Jollene gets hot fast, he said. He liked the Nevio recliner. It handled his weight without creaking.
Carlos Alvarez looked for back support. He struggled with the deep, soft sofas. My lower back is rounding out on the Radley, he mentioned. He preferred the Virton. The fixed cushions kept his spine straight. He noted the Ladlow was too low. There is no neck support here, he complained.
Mia Chen struggled with the scale of the sectionals. The Radley swallows me whole, she laughed. Her feet dangled off the edge. She loved the Randa for its size. I can actually sit back and touch the floor, she said. She found the leather on the Virton too slippery. She kept sliding down.
Jenna Brooks focused on shared space. She liked the sectional configurations. The Jollene chaise is perfect for two, she said. She disliked the Boxberg. She felt the separate cushions created a gap. She and Ethan kept sliding into the crack. She appreciated the heavy feel of the Avenell.
Jamal Davis needed legroom. He found the Randa unusable. My knees are in my chest, he stated. He loved the depth of the Ladlow. It allowed him to stretch comfortably. He tested the armrests. He found the Nevio armrests sturdy enough to push off of.
Ethan Cole tested the nap factor. He loved the Radley. It is basically a bed, he said. He slept there for an hour. He disliked the Jollene tufting. The buttons dig into my face, he noted. He found the mechanized headrests on the Avenell amazing for gaming.
Macy's Sofa Reviews: Our Testing Experience
Radley 5-Piece Fabric Sectional
Our Testing Experience:
I brought the Radley into the main living area. It is a beast of a sofa. I sat down and immediately felt the texture. It is a nubby, soft fabric. It feels very welcoming. I sank into the cushions. It is not a bouncy seat. It is a sink-in seat.
Mia tried to curl up in the corner wedge. This is cozy, she said. She tucked her legs under her. The fabric gripped her yoga pants. She did not slide around. However, the seat depth was a lot for her. She needed an extra pillow behind her back.
Marcus sat heavily on the end unit. I am bottoming out a little, he observed. The foam is not very dense. He felt the suspension system underneath after an hour. Dr. Walker noted that the soft cushions allow the pelvis to tilt backward. This can cause strain over time.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Extremely soft and tactile fabric | Cushions lose shape quickly |
| Modular pieces allow reconfiguration | Foam feels low density |
| Very inviting for casual lounging | Fabric can pill over time |
Details:
-
Price: Mid-Range
-
Dimensions: 113" W x 113" D (approx)
-
Seat Depth: 24"
-
Seat Height: 19"
-
Cushion: High-density foam (feels medium-soft)
-
Fabric: 100% Polyester (Chenille feel)
-
Assembly: Minimal (connectors)
-
Warranty: 1 year limited
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5 | Very plush and inviting initially. |
| Support | 3.8 | Lacks firm lumbar resistance. |
| Durability | 3.5 | Cushions need constant fluffing. |
| Fabric Feel | 4.8 | Warm, soft, and textured. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | The cozy family favorite. |
Jollene 113" 2-Piece Fabric Sectional
Our Testing Experience:
I placed the Jollene in our "styled" room setup. It looks fantastic. The mid-century legs are sleek. I sat down and felt a stark difference from the Radley. It is firm. The seat pushes back against you. The tufting on the backrest is tight.
Jenna and Ethan sat on the chaise part. This looks better than it sits, Jenna remarked. She liked the support. But she missed the plushness. Ethan tried to lie down. The buttons are annoying, he said. He could feel them through his shirt.
Carlos worked from this sofa. He liked the upright back. My posture is good here, he noted. He typed on his laptop for two hours. He felt no neck strain. However, the fabric trapped heat. Marcus touched the seat after Carlos got up. It is warm to the touch, Marcus confirmed.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Beautiful mid-century aesthetic | Seat is quite firm/stiff |
| Good upright back support | Tufting traps crumbs and dirt |
| sturdy frame feel | Fabric retains body heat |
Details:
-
Price: Mid-Range
-
Dimensions: 113" W x 86" D (Chaise)
-
Seat Depth: 22"
-
Seat Height: 19"
-
Cushion: 1.8 density foam
-
Fabric: Polyester
-
Style: Mid-Century Modern
-
Legs: Dark wood finish
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Style | 4.8 | visually striking design. |
| Comfort | 3.9 | a bit too firm for some. |
| Cleanability | 3.5 | buttons make cleaning hard. |
| Posture | 4.4 | keeps the spine upright. |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Style over pure comfort. |
Randa 79" Fabric Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I moved the Randa into a smaller den space. It fits easily through doors. I sat down and noticed the scale. It is petite. The cushions are simple. The fabric feels a bit thin. It is clearly a budget option.
Mia was the biggest fan of this one. My feet touch the floor! she exclaimed. The shallow seat fit her perfectly. She could sit without slouching. She liked the armrest height. It worked for her frame.
Jamal tried to sit here. It was comical. I feel like a giant, he said. His knees were high in the air. The seat ended mid-thigh for him. He leaned back and felt the frame flex slightly. Dr. Walker commented that this scale is excellent for users under 5'4" but ergonomically poor for tall users.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Excellent price point | Very small scale |
| Fits in apartments easily | Fabric feels thin/cheap |
| Good ergonomics for short users | Frame flexes under weight |
Details:
-
Price: Budget
-
Dimensions: 79" W x 38" D
-
Seat Depth: 20"
-
Seat Height: 19"
-
Fabric: Textured Polyester
-
Style: Contemporary
-
Cushions: Reversible seat
-
Assembly: Screw-on legs
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Value | 4.5 | great price for what it is. |
| Comfort | 3.6 | basic foam, nothing special. |
| Size Fit | 4.0 | specific to small spaces. |
| Build | 3.2 | lightweight construction. |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | The apartment starter. |
Virton 88" Leather Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I approached the Virton with high expectations. The leather looked smooth. I sat down. It was cool to the touch. The surface was slick. I slid forward slightly. The foam is firm and resilient. It does not hug you.
Marcus appreciated the cooling effect. I am not sweating on this, he noted. He liked the solid feel. The leather didn't stretch much under his weight. He tested the armrests. They are square and wide. Good for a drink tray.
Jenna found it a bit sterile. It feels like an office couch, she said. She tried to cuddle with Ethan. They kept sliding apart. The leather offers no grip. However, clean-up was a breeze. We wiped a coffee spill instantly.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Sleek, modern appearance | Leather is slippery |
| Very easy to clean | Feel is cold initially |
| Firm, durable seating | Lacks cozy factor |
Details:
-
Price: High
-
Dimensions: 88" W x 39" D
-
Seat Depth: 22"
-
Seat Height: 18"
-
Material: Top Grain Leather on seats
-
Legs: Metal
-
Color: various neutrals
-
Suspension: Sinuous spring
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Durability | 4.6 | leather holds up well. |
| Maintenance | 4.8 | wipe-clean surface. |
| Comfort | 3.8 | stiff and slippery. |
| Style | 4.5 | sharp modern lines. |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | The modern durable choice. |
Nevio 3-Piece Leather Sectional
Our Testing Experience:
I set this up for a movie marathon. This is a function-first piece. I sat in the corner and hit the recline button. The motion was smooth. The headrest adjusted. I felt fully supported from head to toe.
Jamal loved this one. The leg rest is long enough, he said. He extended fully. His heels rested comfortably. He liked the high back. It supported his shoulders. The leather felt thicker than the Virton. It had a grainier texture.
Carlos noted the lumbar support. When I recline, the gap fills in, he observed. He felt less pressure on his lower spine. However, the sofa is visually heavy. It took up a lot of visual space in the room. Dr. Walker praised the adjustable positions for distributing body weight effectively.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Excellent reclining comfort | Visually bulky and heavy |
| Adjustable headrests | Requires power source |
| Durable leather feel | Mechanical parts add weight |
Details:
-
Price: High
-
Dimensions: 117" W (approx)
-
Motion: Power Recline
-
Material: Leather / Vinyl Match
-
Features: USB ports
-
Back: High back design
-
Seat: Bucket style
-
Warranty: Mechanism coverage varies
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Function | 4.8 | smooth motors and range. |
| Comfort | 4.7 | excellent for relaxing. |
| Style | 3.5 | looks like a "dad couch". |
| Support | 4.6 | full body alignment. |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | The movie night king. |
Avenell 4-Piece Leather Sectional
Our Testing Experience:
I felt the luxury immediately here. The leather is premium. I sat down and played with the controls. The headrest articulates forward. This is great for watching TV while lying back. The seat is wide.
Ethan was in heaven. I can adjust everything, he said. He found a perfect angle for gaming. The console storage was useful. He stored his controllers there. The seat firmness is medium. It has a good bounce.
Mia found the controls hard to reach. I have to stretch my arm down, she noted. She also found the seat too deep when upright. Her legs didn't bend at the edge naturally. The footprint is massive. It dominated our testing room.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Premium leather quality | Very expensive |
| Highly adjustable positioning | Large footprint |
| Built-in storage/charging | Complex assembly |
Details:
-
Price: High
-
Dimensions: 131" W x 118" D
-
Material: Semi-Aniline Leather
-
Motion: Power Headrest/Recline
-
Features: Console storage
-
Color: Grey/Brown options
-
Cushion: High resiliency foam
-
Style: Contemporary motion
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Luxury Feel | 4.8 | leather is top tier. |
| Ergonomics | 4.7 | adjustable head is key. |
| Value | 3.8 | very high price tag. |
| Space | 3.5 | requires a big room. |
| Overall Score | 4.5 | The luxury tech sectional. |
Boxberg 89" Fabric Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I looked at the Boxberg and saw a classic. Rolled arms, welted seams. I sat down. It felt familiar. It is the kind of sofa you see in many parents' houses. The seat is medium-firm. It does not surprise you.
Jenna sat with her legs tucked. The rolled arm is nice to lean on, she said. It is padded well. She liked the height of the back cushions. They reached her shoulders. The fabric is a woven polyester. It felt durable but a bit rough.
Marcus tested the frame. He dropped onto it. It wobbles a tiny bit, he noted. The legs are screw-in. He felt the back cushions might sag over time. They are loose fiber-fill. Dr. Walker noted the standard dimensions make it a "safe" choice for average body types but lacks specific ergonomic contouring.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Timeless traditional design | Back cushions may sag |
| Comfortable rolled arms | Fabric is standard quality |
| versatile neutral colors | Frame feels average |
Details:
-
Price: Mid-Range
-
Dimensions: 89" W x 39" D
-
Seat Depth: 22"
-
Seat Height: 19"
-
Arm Style: Rolled arm
-
Fabric: Polyester weave
-
Cushion: Reversible
-
Assembly: Legs only
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Classic Style | 4.5 | fits traditional decor. |
| Comfort | 4.0 | reliable, standard feel. |
| Durability | 3.8 | concerns about back fill. |
| Value | 4.0 | fair price for size. |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | The traditional standard. |
Ladlow 90" Fabric Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I noted the sharp lines of the Ladlow. It sits low to the ground. I sat down. The cushion is one long bench seat. It is firm. Very firm. It keeps the room looking tidy.
Carlos liked the bench seat. No cracks to fall into, he said. He could sit anywhere. He liked the depth. It allowed him to sit cross-legged. But the back is low. I cannot lean my head back, he noted.
Mia struggled getting out of it. It sits lower than the others. I have to push myself up, she said. The track arms are wide and flat. She used them as a table for her phone. The fabric is a tight weave. It looks very tailored.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Modern, clean bench seat | Very low back profile |
| No gaps between cushions | Seat is quite hard |
| Wide, functional arms | Hard to stand up from |
Details:
-
Price: Mid-Range
-
Dimensions: 90" W x 38" D
-
Seat Depth: 24"
-
Seat Height: 18"
-
Design: Bench seat
-
Fabric: Performance fabric
-
Legs: Hidden/Low
-
Style: Modern Euro
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Aesthetics | 4.5 | very clean and modern. |
| Seat Firmness | 3.5 | maybe too hard for some. |
| Lounging | 3.8 | low back limits relaxing. |
| Maintenance | 4.2 | tight fabric cleans well. |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | The firm modern bench. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Breathability | Durability | Movement Ease |
| Radley Sectional | 4.3 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Jollene Sectional | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Randa Sofa | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 4.5 |
| Virton Leather | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| Nevio Recliner | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Avenell Motion | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Boxberg Sofa | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| Ladlow Sofa | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.5 |
The Avenell scores highest for its combination of premium leather and ergonomic adjustability. The Radley remains a comfort leader but loses points on long-term durability of the cushions. The Randa scores lowest due to its lightweight build and limited fit for taller people. The Virton excels in durability but lacks the "cozy" score.
Best Picks
-
Best Overall Macy's Sofa: Radley 5-Piece Fabric Sectional. This model earns the top spot for value and comfort. It offers the specific "sink-in" feel that most families want at a price that is hard to beat.
-
Best Leather Macy's Sofa: Avenell 4-Piece Leather Sectional. This sofa wins for luxury features. The adjustable headrests and premium leather quality provide a superior seating experience for those with a higher budget.
-
Best Style-Forward Macy's Sofa: Jollene Sectional. This piece takes the award for aesthetics. Its mid-century lines and tufting make it the best choice for buyers who want their living room to look designed and curated.
How to Choose the Macy's Sofa?
Choosing the right Macy's sofa depends on your room size and sitting habits. Start by measuring your space. If you are in a tight apartment, the Randa or Boxberg (under 90 inches) are your best bets. For large open basements, the modular Radley allows you to expand indefinitely.
Consider your height. If you are tall like Jamal (over 6'0"), avoid the Randa. Look for the Ladlow or Radley which offer deeper seats (24 inches). If you are petite like Mia, the Jollene or Randa will let your feet touch the floor comfortably.
Think about your lifestyle. If you have pets, the Virton leather is the safest choice for easy cleaning. If you love to nap, the Radley has the softest arms and deepest cushions. For movie buffs, the power reclining Nevio provides the best head support. If you eat on the couch often, avoid the Jollene; the tufted buttons will trap crumbs.
Limitations
Macy's sofas are mass-market products. They generally lack the heavy-duty construction of high-end boutique brands. We found that the cushion density in models like the Radley is often lower, leading to sagging after a year or two of heavy use. You will need to fluff them regularly.
The fabric choices are mostly polyester blends. While durable, they can trap heat and pill over time. You will not find natural linens or wools here. Additionally, the customization is limited. You usually have only two or three color choices per model. The delivery windows can also be unpredictable depending on stock levels.
Is the Macy's Sofa worth it?
Macy's sofas are worth buying if you purchase them during a sale.
-
You get a reliable, comfortable piece of furniture for a fair price.
-
Families and first-time homebuyers get the most value from the Radley and Jollene lines.
-
The value drops if you pay full retail price. The construction quality does not match the non-sale sticker prices.
-
If you need heirloom quality or natural fabrics, look elsewhere. But for a solid, everyday sofa that lasts 5-7 years, Macy's delivers.
FAQs
1. Do Macy's sofa cushions hold their shape?
It varies by model. The Radley cushions are soft and will flatten with use; they require weekly fluffing. The Jollene and Virton have tighter, firmer foam that holds shape better but feels harder.
2. Is the Radley sofa good for pets?
The texture is durable, but it can trap hair. The weave is tight enough to resist some scratching, but the fabric is not "performance" grade. We recommend a darker color if you have shedding pets.
3. How long does it take to get a Macy's sofa?
"In-stock" items can arrive in 1-2 weeks with their White Glove delivery. Custom orders or backordered items can take 8-12 weeks. We suggest checking the specific date on the product page before ordering.
4. Are Macy's sectional sofas reversible?
Most are not. You must order a "Left Facing" or "Right Facing" model. However, modular ones like the Radley allow you to move the armless chairs around, but the corner pieces are fixed.
5. Do the reclining sofas need to be plugged in?
Yes, models like the Nevio and Avenell are power recliners. You need an outlet nearby. Some have battery packs available for purchase separately if you want to float the sofa in the room.
6. Is the "White Glove" delivery worth it?
Yes. Macy's delivery team brings the sofa inside, unboxes it, assembles the legs, and takes away the trash. Since these sofas are heavy, we highly recommend this service.
7. Can I return a Macy's sofa if I don't like it?
You have a very short window. Usually, you have 3 days after delivery to report damage or preference issues. A restocking fee often applies (15%). It is not a "try at home for 100 days" policy like online startups.