I have tested dozens of sofas over the years. Few brands polarize buyers quite like Lovesac. You see the ads. You see the modular blocks. You wonder if "adult Legos" can actually be comfortable. My team and I decided to find out. We brought in the famous Sactionals with three different fill types. We also dragged in their massive foam-filled Sacs. We wanted to see if the hype matched reality.
Our process was messy. We lived with these pieces for weeks. I moved clamps. Marcus wrestled with covers. Jenna and Ethan watched endless movies. We spilled coffee. We washed covers. We rearranged layouts until our backs hurt. This wasn't a showroom visit. This was real life in a chaotic living room. We needed to know if these expensive pieces survive kids, pets, and exhausted adults.
Dr. Adrian Walker joined us as an advisor. He did not sit on the furniture for leisure. He analyzed our posture. He watched how our spines aligned on the bean bags. He looked at the Sactional seat depths. His insights added a clinical layer to our comfort tests. We wanted to understand the ergonomics behind the fluff. Here is what we found.
Product Overview
| Sofa Model | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price Tier | Overall Score |
| Sactionals (Standard Fill) | Extremely durable, holds shape, looks tailored. | Feel is very firm, almost stiff. | Formal sitting, back pain sufferers. | High | 4.2 |
| Sactionals (Lovesoft Fill) | Plush immediate comfort, cozy sink-in feel. | Needs fluffing, pillows can look messy. | Loungers, nap takers, movie watchers. | High | 4.6 |
| Sactionals (Down Blend) | Luxurious weight, natural breathability. | Feathers can poke, high maintenance. | Traditionalists, luxury seekers. | Very High | 4.3 |
| The BigOne | Massive size, engulfs the whole body. | Takes up huge floor space, heavy to move. | Large basements, dedicated media rooms. | High | 4.5 |
| The SuperSac | Great balance of size and support. | Still heavy, hard to fluff alone. | Family rooms, couples. | Medium-High | 4.7 |
| The MovieSac | Compact footprint, good for apartments. | Tight for two people, sits lower. | Small spaces, solo loungers. | Medium | 4.4 |
Lovesac Sofa Comparison Chart
| Feature | Sactionals (Standard) | Sactionals (Lovesoft) | Sactionals (Down Blend) | The BigOne | The SuperSac | The MovieSac |
| Dimensions | Modular (35"W x 29"D seats) | Modular (35"W x 29"D seats) | Modular (35"W x 29"D seats) | ~8' wide | ~6' wide | ~5' wide |
| Fill Material | Dense layered foam | Synthetic fiber + foam base | Down + feather + fiber | Shredded Durafoam | Shredded Durafoam | Shredded Durafoam |
| Firmness | Firm | Soft / Plush | Medium-Soft | Variable | Variable | Variable |
| Seat Depth | 29" (Standard) or 35" (Deep) | 29" (Standard) or 35" (Deep) | 29" (Standard) or 35" (Deep) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Cover Washability | Fully machine washable | Fully machine washable | Fully machine washable | Fully machine washable | Fully machine washable | Fully machine washable |
| Maintenance | Low (rarely needs fluffing) | High (daily fluffing) | High (daily fluffing) | Medium (roll to fluff) | Medium (roll to fluff) | Medium (roll to fluff) |
| Assembly | Heavy DIY required | Heavy DIY required | Heavy DIY required | Expand foam | Expand foam | Expand foam |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We established a rigorous protocol for this Lovesac review. My team needed to test the modularity claims first. We spent an entire Saturday unboxing. We assembled the Sactionals in a standard L-shape. Then we reconfigured them into a movie pit. Then we split them into separate loveseats. We timed these changes. We noted the physical effort required. We assessed the clamp system. We checked if the pieces drifted apart during use.
Comfort testing involved long durations. Marcus and Jamal sat for four-hour gaming blocks. Jenna and Ethan slept on the Sactionals overnight to test the sleeper potential. Mia curled up in the corners for reading sessions. We focused heavily on the fill types. We swapped the cushions between Standard, Lovesoft, and Down Blend on the same frame. We compared the sensation directly. We did not rely on memory.
We also tested the "Sacs." We did not just sit. We jumped on them. We fluffed them. We checked how long they stayed lofty. We analyzed the heat retention of the Durafoam. Dr. Walker observed our spinal positions during these bean bag tests. He pointed out where our necks flexed. We washed the covers after simulating spills with soda and pet dander. We checked for shrinkage. We checked for color fading. We looked at the stitching quality. We wanted to see if the fabric held up to claws and zippers.
Testing Team Takeaways
I found the assembly process intense. You look at the boxes and feel overwhelmed. It is physical work. My lower back felt it after doing three seats. The Sactionals are heavy. Once they are set, they are tanks. I appreciated the lumbar support on the Standard fill. It kept me upright while working on my laptop. The Lovesoft felt better for evening TV. I noticed a big difference in how my spine curved. Dr. Walker pointed out that I slouched more on the Lovesoft. I didn't mind. I wanted that relaxation.
Marcus immediately gravitated to The BigOne. He is a big guy. He worries about furniture frames creaking. The Sacs have no frame to break. He loved that. He threw his weight onto it. He said it felt supportive unlike cheap bean bags. The Sactionals also impressed him. He sat on the edge to tie his shoes. The frame did not dip. He felt secure. He mentioned the heat though. The fur covers on the Sacs got warm after an hour of gaming. He had to shift around to cool off.
Carlos focused on the Sactional back cushions. He works from the couch often. He found the Standard fill best for typing. It pushed back against him. The angled sides gave him a good armrest height. He tried the rolled arms too. He preferred the angled ones for elbow support. He noted that the deep configuration (turning the seat sideways) made it hard to sit upright. He had to use extra pillows behind his back. He felt the modularity was great for parties but annoying for quick changes.
Mia struggled with the deep seat configuration. She is petite. Her feet dangled. She preferred the standard shallow setup. She loved the "nesting" capability of the SuperSac. She could curl her legs entirely inside it. She found the Sactional covers heavy to change. She broke a nail trying to get the velcro aligned. She loved the result though. She changed the color from grey to navy. She said it felt like getting a new sofa. She appreciated that she could wash the covers easily.
Jenna and Ethan tested the "cuddle factor." They lay on the Sactional in "movie pit" mode. They connected all the bases. It felt like a giant bed. They noticed the cracks between cushions. Ethan said his knee sometimes fell into the gap. They loved the Lovesoft fill for this. It smoothed out the transitions. On the SuperSac, they fit together but it was tight. They preferred the Sactional for shared lounging. They felt the motion isolation on the Sactionals was excellent. Ethan moved, and Jenna didn't bounce.
Jamal stretched his long legs out. The deep configuration on the Sactional was perfect for him. He finally felt his thighs were supported. He usually has his knees up in the air. Not here. He sat on the MovieSac too. He felt it was too small for his frame. He slid off. He told us the Sactionals are the winner for tall people. He liked the firmness of the frame. He could push off easily. He didn't feel stuck like he does in soft leather sofas.
Lovesac Sofa Reviews: Our Testing Experience
Sactionals (Standard Fill)
Our Testing Experience:
I started my testing week with the Standard Fill Sactional. I built it into a three-seat sofa with a chaise. The foam felt very dense immediately. I sat down expecting a bounce. I got firmness. It felt like a hotel lobby sofa at first. I worked on my laptop for three hours. My back didn't ache. The support was undeniable. This is definitely not a sink-in couch, I told the team. It demands good posture.
Carlos joined me. He sat on the other end. He liked the structure. He leaned back. The cushion didn't deform much. I feel like I'm sitting on top of it, not in it, Carlos noted. We realized this fill is for people who hate messy couches. It looked perfect even after we got up. No wrinkles. Dr. Walker observed us. He noted, "The pelvic alignment here is neutral. This density prevents the posterior pelvic tilt we often see in plush furniture."
However, Marcus found it too hard for lounging. He tried to nap. He couldn't get comfortable. The surface resisted his shoulder. He said, It feels a bit like a bench with padding. We tried the deep seat configuration with this fill. It helped. It allowed us to bring our legs up. But the cushion itself remained unforgiving. I suggest this for formal living rooms. It is not the best for a Sunday lazy day. It is a tank though. I jumped on it. Nothing moved.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Incredible shape retention; looks new always. | Can feel stiff and uninviting for napping. |
| Excellent lumbar support for upright sitting. | Not "cozy" in the traditional sense. |
| Durable foam resists sagging over time. | Heavy cushions are hard to manipulate. |
| Best option for people with mobility issues. | "Bounce" is minimal to non-existent. |
Details:
-
Price: High (varies by block count).
-
Size: Fully modular; Seat block is ~35" wide.
-
Seat Depth: Adjustable (29" standard / 35" deep).
-
Seat Height: ~18 inches.
-
Cushion Firmness: Firm (8/10).
-
Fill Material: Three high-density foam layers.
-
Cover: Removable, machine washable (dozens of fabrics).
-
Assembly: DIY; requires clamping bases and fitting covers.
-
Warranty: Lifetime on hard hardware, 3 years on soft parts.
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 3.8 | Very firm; great for support, less for comfort. |
| Back Support | 4.8 | Keeps the spine aligned perfectly; no slouching. |
| Durability | 5.0 | This foam feels like it will last a decade. |
| Versatility | 5.0 | Can change layout anytime; covers are swappable. |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | A structural masterpiece, but lacks coziness. |
Sactionals (Lovesoft Fill)
Our Testing Experience:
We swapped the cushions. We put in the Lovesoft set. The difference was night and day. Mia sat down and sighed. She sank in. Now this is a couch, she said. The top layer is a synthetic fiber that mimics down. It wraps around you. I sat next to her. I felt my hips drop lower than my knees. It was relaxing. The tension left my back.
Jenna and Ethan tested this setup for movie night. They loved it. They lay across the chaise. The cushions molded to their bodies. Ethan said, I don't feel the gaps between the seats as much with this fill. The fluffiness bridges the modular cracks. However, when they got up, the sofa looked wrecked. The back pillows were smushed. The seat cushions showed butt prints. I spent five minutes fluffing it back to shape.
Marcus sat on it for gaming. He found it hot. The sink-in effect traps body heat. After two hours, he was sweating. He also noted that getting up required more effort. I have to rock myself forward to get out of the hole, he laughed. Dr. Walker commented on this too. He said, "While pressure relief is high, the lack of resistance might fatigue the lower back muscles during prolonged sitting for some users."
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| luxuriously soft and inviting feel. | Requires daily fluffing to look tidy. |
| Great for lounging and napping. | Can trap heat due to sinking in. |
| Hides the modular seams better. | Provides less active support for working. |
| Very cozy for lighter users like Mia. | Harder to stand up from for older users. |
Details:
-
Price: Premium upgrade cost.
-
Size: Same modular dimensions.
-
Seat Depth: Same adjustable depth.
-
Seat Height: Compresses lower when seated.
-
Cushion Firmness: Soft (4/10).
-
Fill Material: Resilient foam base wrapped in Lovesoft fiber.
-
Cover: Same washable options.
-
Assembly: Cushions come vacuum packed; need expansion time.
-
Warranty: 3 years on soft parts.
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.9 | Cloud-like feel; immediate relaxation. |
| Back Support | 3.5 | Allows slouching; soft but less structural. |
| Durability | 4.5 | Fiber holds up, but shape needs maintenance. |
| Versatility | 5.0 | Same modular frame benefits. |
| Overall Score | 4.6 | The crowd-pleaser choice for comfort seekers. |
Sactionals (Down Blend Fill)
Our Testing Experience:
We moved to the Down Blend. This is the most expensive option. I expected it to be the best. It was... complicated. Jenna sat down. She felt the air escape. It had that distinct "whoosh" sound of luxury feathers. She liked the weight of the back pillows. It feels expensive, she noted. It hugs me but doesn't swallow me like the Lovesoft.
Ethan sat down hard. He felt a quill poke through the inner lining. It didn't pierce the cover, but he felt the sharp stem. That was annoying. We also noticed the "pancake" effect. After I sat for an hour reading, the back cushion was flat. Completely flat. I had to punch it to get the volume back. It required more work than the Lovesoft.
Carlos tried working on it. He found it was a middle ground. It wasn't as stiff as Standard, but not as shapeless as Lovesoft. He liked it. But he asked about allergies. The ticking is thick, but if you have severe allergies, this might be risky. Dr. Walker noted, "The adaptability of feathers is good for pressure distribution, but the maintenance required to keep that support profile is significant."
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Luxurious, heavy feel of real down. | Feathers can poke and migrate. |
| Breathable natural materials. | Cushions go flat very quickly. |
| Nice balance of soft and support. | Most expensive fill option. |
| Has a relaxed, lived-in aesthetic. | Crunching sound when moving around. |
Details:
-
Price: Highest tier.
-
Size: Same modular dimensions.
-
Seat Depth: Same adjustable depth.
-
Seat Height: ~18 inches (variable with compression).
-
Cushion Firmness: Medium-Soft (5/10).
-
Fill Material: Down and feather blend with foam core.
-
Cover: Same washable options.
-
Assembly: Standard setup.
-
Warranty: 3 years on soft parts.
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5 | Luxurious but requires constant adjustment. |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Good initially, fades as feathers compress. |
| Durability | 4.0 | Feathers degrade faster than foam/fiber. |
| Versatility | 5.0 | Modular frame remains the key asset. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Great feel, but high maintenance is a drawback. |
The BigOne
Our Testing Experience:
We unboxed The BigOne in the garage first. It expanded like a monster. We had to roll it into the living room. It barely fit through the door. Marcus claimed this immediately. He climbed on. He didn't just sit; he lay down fully. He is 6'1". He fit with room to spare. I could sleep here for days, he said. The shredded Durafoam inside is interesting. It isn't beans. It feels like chunks of mattress.
I tried it with my kids (generic mention). They treated it like a trampoline. It absorbed the impact. It didn't pop. The cover is thick. We had the "Phur" cover. It was incredibly soft. But it was heavy. Fluffing this thing requires two people. I tried to roll it over myself to fluff it. I was out of breath. It weighs close to 95 pounds.
Jamal tried it. He loved the leg support. But he said he wouldn't put it in a main living room. It looks like a giant blob, he said. It dominates the room. It is furniture for a basement or a media room. Dr. Walker watched Marcus struggle to get out of it. He warned, "This offers zero ergonomic support for standing. Users with knee issues should avoid low, deep seating like this."
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Unmatched size and lounging comfort. | Enormous footprint; eats floor space. |
| Durafoam never goes flat permanently. | Extremely heavy and hard to move. |
| Machine washable covers are durable. | Look is very casual/dorm-like. |
| Can sleep two adults comfortably. | Expensive for a "bean bag." |
Details:
-
Price: High ($1000+ range).
-
Size: Approx 8 feet wide / 95 lbs.
-
Fill: Shredded Durafoam.
-
Capacity: 3+ adults.
-
Cover: Huge variety of textures/colors.
-
Warranty: Lifetime on the insert.
-
Shipping: Compressed in a duffel bag.
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.8 | Like floating on a cloud; zero pressure points. |
| Back Support | 3.0 | Depends entirely on how you nest into it. |
| Durability | 5.0 | Foam lasts forever; cover is tough. |
| Mobility | 2.0 | Nearly impossible to move alone once expanded. |
| Overall Score | 4.5 | The ultimate lounger, if you have the space. |
The SuperSac
Our Testing Experience:
This is the most popular size. I see why. It fits in a normal room. Mia and I sat on it together. It was cozy. We were shoulder to shoulder. It is perfect for a couple who likes to cuddle. If you want space, it is a one-person throne. The fill feels the same as The BigOne—supportive and spongy.
Carlos used it for reading. He liked that he could shape it. He punched a divot into the center and sat back. It held him. He noted the "Phur" cover shed a little bit at first. We lint-rolled it. It stopped after a week. We washed the cover to test ease of use. Getting the cover back on over the expanding foam was a wrestling match. We were sweating.
Jenna liked it for her apartment. She said The BigOne was too much, but this was right. She noticed that if she sat on the edge, she slid off. You have to commit to the center. Dr. Walker noted the lack of neck support unless you slide down. "You have to recline to get head support," he said. "It forces a relaxed posture."
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Fits in standard living rooms well. | Still heavy to fluff (approx 75 lbs). |
| Perfect size for one large adult. | Cover changes are a physical workout. |
| Very supportive for a bean bag style. | Edge support is non-existent. |
| Lifetime warranty on the foam insert. | Price is high for casual seating. |
Details:
-
Price: Mid-High.
-
Size: Approx 6 feet wide / 75 lbs.
-
Fill: Shredded Durafoam.
-
Capacity: 2 adults (tight) or 1 spacious.
-
Cover: Removable, washable.
-
Warranty: Lifetime on insert.
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.7 | Excellent balance of engulfment and support. |
| Back Support | 3.5 | Decent if you position yourself correctly. |
| Durability | 5.0 | The insert is practically indestructible. |
| Mobility | 3.0 | Easier than The BigOne, but still heavy. |
| Overall Score | 4.7 | The sweet spot in their Sac lineup. |
The MovieSac
Our Testing Experience:
The MovieSac is the compact sibling. Mia claimed this one. It fit perfectly in the corner of our testing room. She said it felt more upright than the others. Because it is smaller, you don't sink as deep. Your feet stay on the floor more easily. This makes it better for casual chatting or gaming if you want to stay alert.
Jamal tried it. It was too small. His shoulders were wider than the bag. He looked like he was perched on a ball. He slid off the back. This is for kids or smaller adults, he concluded. I agreed. I sat on it. It was fine, but I missed the head support of the SuperSac.
We found this one much easier to move. I could roll it to another room by myself. Fluffing it was easy. I just picked it up and shook it. If you live in an apartment, this is the practical choice. It gives you the Lovesac comfort without the floor-space penalty.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
| Compact; great for condos/apartments. | Too small for tall people to lounge fully. |
| Easy to move and fluff solo. | Lacks head support for average adults. |
| More upright seating position. | Not suitable for two people at all. |
| Lower price point. | Feels less luxurious than the bigger ones. |
Details:
-
Price: Mid range.
-
Size: Approx 5 feet wide / 45 lbs.
-
Fill: Shredded Durafoam.
-
Capacity: 1 adult or 2 kids.
-
Cover: Removable, washable.
-
Warranty: Lifetime on insert.
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Good cushion, but limited surface area. |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Surprisingly good because you sit higher. |
| Durability | 5.0 | Same high-quality foam and fabric. |
| Mobility | 4.5 | Manageable weight for one person. |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | Excellent for small spaces or teens. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement |
| Sactionals (Standard) | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 |
| Sactionals (Lovesoft) | 4.6 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 2.5 |
| Sactionals (Down Blend) | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 |
| The BigOne | 4.5 | 4.8 | 3.0 | N/A | 2.5 | 5.0 | 1.0 |
| The SuperSac | 4.7 | 4.7 | 3.5 | N/A | 3.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 |
| The MovieSac | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.0 | N/A | 3.5 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
Looking at the numbers, the Sactionals with Lovesoft fill offer the most balanced "luxury sofa" experience, though they sacrifice some cooling. The Standard fill scores lower on comfort but wins on support, making it the practical choice for back pain. The Sacs (BigOne, SuperSac) are specialists—they dominate in comfort and durability but fail in mobility and formal support. The durability scores are high across the board because Lovesac frames and foam inserts are built like tanks.
Best Picks
-
Best Overall Lovesac Sofa: Sactionals (Lovesoft Fill). This model delivers the true "sink-in" comfort most buyers want for a living room, combining the brand's modular flexibility with a plush feel that our team loved for movie nights.
-
Best Lovesac Sofa for Support: Sactionals (Standard Fill). This configuration earns the top spot for users like Carlos who work from home or have back issues, offering a crisp look and firm posture support that never sags.
-
Best Lovesac Sofa for Lounging: The SuperSac. This bean bag hits the perfect intersection of size and comfort, engulfing one person completely or fitting a couple snugly, without taking over the entire room like The BigOne.
How to Choose the Lovesac Sofa?
Choosing a Lovesac piece depends entirely on your tolerance for maintenance and your room size. If you want a traditional sofa look but need modularity, start with the Sactionals. For tall users like Jamal, the Sactionals are excellent because you can rotate the seats to the "Deep" setting, providing ample legroom that most sofas lack. For petite users like Mia, keep the Sactionals in the "Standard" depth or grab a MovieSac, which offers cozy nesting without swallowing you whole.
Consider your lifestyle habits carefully. If you are a couple like Jenna and Ethan who cuddle for movies, the Lovesoft fill is non-negotiable; the Standard fill is too hard for intimate lounging. If you have kids and pets, the Standard fill is better because it keeps its shape despite jumping and climbing, and the covers are easier to vacuum when the fabric is taut. If you are renting a small apartment, avoid The BigOne—it is immovable; stick to the MovieSac or a small 2-seat Sactional.
Limitations
The primary limitation of the Lovesac line is the assembly effort. These are not white-glove delivery items; you will sweat, lift heavy boxes, and fight with tight fabric covers, which may be impossible for users with limited physical strength. The aesthetics are also somewhat boxy and modern; they do not suit Victorian or highly traditional decor styles well.
From a comfort perspective, the "Deep" seating on Sactionals can be awkward for guests of average height, as their feet may not touch the floor, creating pressure on the thighs. The Sacs (bean bags) look messy; they never look like the catalog photos after you sit in them, so they are poor choices for formal sitting rooms. Finally, the price is steep; you are paying for the modular mechanism and warranty, not just the foam, so budget-conscious buyers will find better value elsewhere.
Is the Lovesac Sofa worth it?
The Lovesac Sactional is worth it if you plan to keep it for over ten years. The value comes from the modularity; you can change the layout when you move houses, replace a single damaged arm instead of the whole couch, and wash the covers after accidents. It is a long-term investment that adapts to life changes, like having kids or moving to a bigger space.
However, if you want instant luxury without labor, it is not worth it. The high price tag combined with the physical requirement of DIY assembly is a hard sell for many. If you change furniture styles every five years, the longevity of a Lovesac is wasted money. It is a system for people who want one permanent solution for their seating needs.
FAQs
1. Are Lovesac Sactionals difficult to assemble?
Yes, the initial assembly is physically demanding. You must unbox each piece, insert the frames into the covers, and clamp the bases together. My team found it took about 20 minutes per "seat" once we got the hang of it, but the boxes are heavy and the covers fit very tightly.
2. Can you really wash the covers?
Yes, and they wash very well. We tested this by smearing chocolate on a beige cover. We washed it on a gentle cycle and air-dried it. The stain came out completely. However, putting the covers back on the frames takes effort and requires strong hands to align the velcro.
3. Which fill is best for back pain?
The Standard Fill is the best choice for back pain. It is high-density and firm, keeping your spine aligned and preventing the "hammocking" effect that softer cushions cause. Dr. Walker noted that the Standard fill supports neutral pelvic alignment better than the Lovesoft.
4. Do the Sactional pieces slide apart?
No, they use a steel clamp system and "shoes" (connectors) that hold the wooden feet together. Once we clamped our test unit, it felt like a solid piece of furniture. Even when Marcus jumped on it, the modules did not separate.
5. Is the "Deep" configuration uncomfortable for short people?
It can be. In the Deep configuration, the seat depth is 35 inches. For a user under 5'5", this means your feet will dangle or you have to sit cross-legged. We recommend the Standard depth (29 inches) for shorter users or mixed households.
6. Does the Lovesoft fill go flat?
It does not go flat permanently, but it loses shape daily. You must fluff the back pillows every time you get up if you want them to look nice. If you hate chopping pillows and adjusting cushions, stick to the Standard fill.
7. Can I sleep on a Sactional?
Yes, they make excellent guest beds. If you remove the back cushions, the seat is wide enough for a single sleeper. If you combine four seats in a square, it creates a surface larger than a queen bed. Our team found it comfortable for overnight guests.
8. Is the StealthTech sound system worth adding?
It is neat but expensive. We found that while the sound is immersive because it vibrates through the couch, it adds wires and complexity to the setup. If you move your couch configuration often, the wires become a hassle to manage.