I wanted to evaluate how HAY sofas behave not just in showrooms but in actual, everyday living. My team — Marcus, Carlos, Mia, Jenna, Jamal, Ethan — plus our advisor Dr. Adrian Walker, put these couches through real‑world tasks: work, movie nights, naps, stretching, and hosting.

We assembled each piece, lived with it weeks at a time, rearranged modules, tested comfort across different body types. We tracked seat support, cushion resilience, back and lumbar alignment, fabric feel, breathability, and practicality under varied use.

The aim: to highlight which HAY sofa models deliver reliable comfort, which trade‑offs show up under real use, and which models suit particular lifestyles or body shapes best.

Product Overview

Sofa	Pros	Cons	Ideal For	Price (approx)	Overall Score
HAY Mags Sofa (standard)	Deep seat; modular; minimalist look	Low to floor; firm; may feel too deep or firm for some	Modern apartments; lovers of minimal Scandinavian style	high (designer level)	4.2
HAY Mags Soft Sofa	Softer upholstery & looser look; modular flexibility	Less structured; may lack firm support	Lounging, relaxed homes, soft‑seat lovers	higher than standard	4.3
HAY Quilton Sofa	Broad cushions; plush appearance; inviting depth	Very low‑slung; heavy; less upright support	Cozy lounges; casual living rooms; design‑forward spaces	high	4.1
HAY Can Sofa (2‑seater)	Compact footprint; easy to assemble; simple clean lines	Less seating capacity; seat may feel narrow	Small spaces, couples, minimalist interiors	moderate to high	4.0
HAY Silhouette Sofa (3‑seater)	Balanced size; refined design; good for both small & medium rooms	Higher price; design‑oriented aesthetics may sacrifice padding depth	Stylish living rooms, design‑driven homes	high	4.1
HAY Arbour Club Sofa	Classic form; comfortable seating posture; versatile upholstery	Less modular flexibility; may not offer deep lounging	Traditional or mixed-use living rooms; those wanting structured comfort	high	4.0

Testing Team Takeaways

I repeatedly sat, lounged, and stretched out on these sofas, noticing how they responded under different positions. On some models I slid forward when cushions softened; on others I appreciated stable lumbar alignment. I could sense how seat depth and back‑angle affected my lower‑back tension after hours of sitting.

Marcus, with his heavier frame, tested long gaming, streaming, and late‑night lounging. He often commented on “whether this seat actually supports my hips or just swallows them,” especially on deep, low sofas. On firmer‑cushioned models he felt stable — less hip‑sink.

Carlos used several sofas for laptop work then moved to TV watching. He paid attention to mid‑back and neck posture over hours. On sofas with deeper cushions he noted “my head leans forward a bit if I don’t use extra back support.”

Mia curled up or sat cross‑legged. On low, deep sofas she sometimes found her feet dangling. She often said the couch “swallowed me,” especially when seat depth was generous and seat height low.

Jenna and Ethan tested shared‑sofa comfort. They watched how much motion transferred when one shifted. On modular, well‑built sofas the movement stayed minimal, letting each relax without disturbing the other.

Jamal, with his tall, athletic build, stretched out on chaise‑like or deep sofas, observing leg support and cushion rebound. He valued sofas that allowed knees to bend naturally without edge pressure, and cushions that bounced back rather than stay compressed.

Dr. Walker noted that sofas with very low seat height and deep seats may prompt poor hip and spine alignment — especially for users who don’t have leg support. He recommended such sofas only for users who lounge or stretch out, not for long upright sitting.

Overall, the HAY line blends design‑driven aesthetics with real use adaptability. Some models favor deep lounging, others better suit work, socializing, or minimal‑footprint settings.

Hay sofa Comparison Chart

Model	Seat Depth / Seat Height / Height of Back	Configuration Options	Cushion/Frame & Materials	Firmness / Cushion Feel	Back Support / Posture Fit	Upholstery / Fabric Options	Breathability & Maintenance	Versatility / Modular Flexibility
Mags Sofa (standard)	Deep & low‑slung (not ultra‑deep lounging)	2‑seater, 3‑seater, modular combinations	High‑density foam cushions; solid base	Medium to firm, well‑structured	Suits lounging or relaxed sitting; upright posture needs cushions	Wide fabric & leather choices	Maintenance moderate; fabric refill/cleaning possible	High modular flexibility (custom layouts)
Mags Soft Sofa	Similar depth/height to Mags, but with softer cushions & looser covers	Same modular options as Mags	Foam + softer upholstery layers; loose fit	Softer, more relaxed	Good for lounging; less defined support for upright sitting	Broad upholstery options	Covers easier to replace/clean; fabrics amenable	Modular and flexible layouts
Quilton Sofa	Broad, deep seat; low‑slung back	Sofa, sectional, corner layouts	Plush cushions, thick upholstery	Medium‑soft, cushy	Great for lounging; poor for upright work posture	Fabric heavy upholstery	Maintenance heavier due to dense fabric	Good for social seating & lounging zones
Can Sofa (2‑seater)	Moderate seat depth; standard seat height	2‑seater, maybe 3‑seater	Foam seat, slim frame, minimal padding	Medium‑firm, structured	Balanced for upright sitting and short lounging	Multiple upholstery fabrics/leathers	Easy to maintain; simple frame	Least modular; simple compact layout
Silhouette Sofa (3‑seater)	Balanced depth/height; mid‑back support	2‑seater & 3‑seater options	Foam/fiber cushions; clean design frame	Medium‑firm, with structured back curve	Good posture support; stable back support	Designer fabrics/leathers	Standard maintenance; breathable options	Moderate flexibility (less modular than Mags)
Arbour Club Sofa	Moderate depth; upright‑leaning back	Standard sofa, some variants	Traditional cushioning + frame components	Medium‑firm, tailored	Good upright support; stable seating	Fabric / leather upholstery options	Maintenance manageable; structured upholstery	Low modular flexibility (non‑modular traditional sofa)

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We conducted testing across multiple dimensions. First, we used each sofa for 2–4 week periods under real living‑room use. We simulated typical tasks: laptop work (2–3 hours), streaming or TV watching (1–4 hours), gaming or reading, stretching or napping, and shared use by two or more people.

We observed posture changes: hip alignment, lumbar comfort, upper‑back and neck posture, especially during prolonged upright sitting. We tracked cushion rebound after repeated use, seat deformation, and frame stability under heavier testers. We assessed breathability and comfort under extended sitting, noting how fabrics responded (heat, cling, wear) especially for Marcus and Jamal. We also tested social scenarios: two people on the sofa shifting, guests sitting, and whether motion transferred. For cleaning and maintenance, we introduced realistic use such as snacks, spills (simulate light spills), pet claws (generic), and assessed upholstery responsiveness and resilience.

hay sofa: Our Testing Experience

HAY Mags Sofa (standard)

I spent many evenings with my laptop on the Mags sofa. The deep seat let me sit cross‑legged or stretch legs out. Hip support felt stable, though after long laptop sessions I slid a bit forward. Back cushions gave moderate lumbar support but lacked firm lower‑back contour for long upright work.

Marcus tested it hard, gaming late at night. He said he felt “real support under my hips,” though he also mentioned that the seat felt a bit firm after two hours. He noted the fabric felt breathable under him, but with his heavier build he liked firmer support more than plush softness.

Mia curled in a corner to read. She reported that the seat “swallowed me a little,” and her feet dangled from the depth, but the overall feel let her relax. She added a throw pillow under her knees for comfort.

Jenna and Ethan tried sharing the sofa. They fit side by side, though the low height made them use extra pillows for head/back support. Motion transfer stayed low; they could shift without disturbing each other.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Deep, spacious seat; suitable for stretching / lounging	Seat feels firm; low seat height may inconvenience shorter users
Modular design; fits minimal or modern interiors	Upright seating lacks strong lumbar/back cushion definition
Breathable upholstery options; good for everyday lounging	Deep seat may be too much for petite users without added supports

Details

• Designer‑level pricing (premium sofa tier)
• Modular configuration; available as 2‑seater, 3‑seater, and extendable combos
• Foam cushions with medium‑firm feel; well‑structured base and frame
• Wide range of upholstery fabrics and leathers; multiple color and finish options
• Low seat height and deep seat depth — comfortable for lounging, less ideal for formal sitting

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.2	Deep spacious seat supports lounging and relaxed sitting
Back Support	4.0	Moderate lumbar/back support; upright posture needs cushions
Seat Depth Fit	4.1	Depth suits lounging and average/tall users; petite users may need support
Cooling/Breathability	4.3	Fabric breathable; seat surface remains comfortable under longer sits
Durability	4.2	Cushions hold shape over weeks; frame stable under varied use
Ease of Movement / Repositioning	4.4	Modular parts manageable; sofa easy to assemble/rearrange
Overall Score	4.2	Solid modern sofa balancing lounging space and stability

HAY Mags Soft Sofa

I lounged on the Mags Soft with a blanket wrapped around and read for hours. The softer upholstery and looser cushion covers made it feel more “sofa‑couch” than “designer seat.” My back felt less rigid, and I could slouch comfortably into a semi‑reclined position without sliding too far forward.

Carlos used it for relaxed evening work and TV watching. He said the seat/back transition felt smoother and more forgiving under his mid‑back. He noted that though the seat was softer, it still offered enough structure for two‑hour work sessions.

Mia curled sideways. She commented the sofa “felt like a cloud under me” — the looseness allowed cozy curl‑ups, and her smaller frame didn’t get swallowed as badly.

Jenna and Ethan watched a long movie together. They both stretched out without crowding; the softness made shifting positions easy, and neither complained about cushion firmness or edge pressure.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Softer, more relaxed feel; better for lounging and lounging comfort	Less structured support; not ideal for upright work or long sitting
Modular flexibility; retains Mags’ layout options	Cushion softness may reduce long‑term posture / support stability
Cozy look and feel; good for casual living spaces	May feel too relaxed or “loose” for users preferring firm support

Details

• Uses similar modular frame as standard Mags
• Cushion layers softer; upholstery looser and more casual feel
• Offers same layout flexibility: 2‑seater, 3‑seater, modular combos
• Upholstery options remain broad; fabric and leather available; cushion covers removable in some cases

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.3	Softer cushioning makes lounging and casual sitting more comfortable
Back Support	4.0	Back support adequate but less structured for upright posture
Seat Depth Fit	4.2	Depth still good; softer seat helps smaller frames better
Cooling/Breathability	4.2	Fabric breathable; softness doesn’t trap heat excessively
Durability	4.1	Softer cushions compress more under heavy use; may need more fluffing over time
Ease of Movement / Repositioning	4.3	Modular design remains manageable; slightly bulkier feel when rearranging
Overall Score	4.3	Best pick for relaxed lounging and casual spaces where firm support isn’t priority

HAY Quilton Sofa

I tried working from the Quilton sofa for a couple of nights. The broad, plush cushions felt inviting. My lower back sank softly; the seat felt cushy but lacked firm hip support. After a long session I felt slight slump in posture.

Marcus sprawled out to watch sports. He appreciated the deep seat and broad width. The softness let him shift positions often. He said the sofa felt good for lounging but less stable when he sat forward at the edge to tie shoes.

Mia curled into a corner for a reading marathon. She described the sofa as “hugging me softly,” yet admitted her feet didn’t touch the floor when curled — requiring extra cushions.

Jenna and Ethan used it during a small get‑together. The sofa accommodated three adults easily. Guests lounged comfortably. The plushness reduced motion transfer — shifting barely disturbed others.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Plush, inviting seating; great for long lounging or casual use	Low seat height and deep seat make upright sitting and posture support weak
Wide seating area; good for groups or hosting	Cushions feel too soft for structured support; may compress under heavy use
Soft fabric upholstery; comfortable curl‑up experience	Less ideal for work, reading upright, or shorter users needing support

Details

• Deep, low‑slung seat; broad cushion base; designed for lounging/social settings
• Plush foam/fiber cushions; heavy upholstery; thick padding under seat and back
• Less modular — layout tends toward standard sofas or corner sofas rather than customizable modules

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.1	Soft and plush comfort for lounging; less ideal for structured sitting
Back Support	3.9	Cushions yield easily, little lumbar support over long upright sessions
Seat Depth Fit	4.0	Deep seating suited to lounging; may overwhelm petite users for upright use
Cooling/Breathability	4.0	Upholstery breathable but dense fabric may retain warmth under heavy use
Durability	4.0	Cushion compression possible over time; frequent fluffing may be required
Ease of Movement / Repositioning	3.9	Heavy structure makes moving or rearranging harder than modular sofas
Overall Score	4.1	Good for lounges and casual living rooms; trade‑off in upright support and mobility

HAY Can Sofa (2‑Seater)

I placed the Can sofa in a small living‑room space. It fit easily and felt elegant with its slim frame. For two‑person use, it worked well — I could work with a laptop for an hour or two without back strain. During movie watching I stretched out a bit; seat felt firm but comfortable.

Carlos used it for solo laptop work. He said upright posture felt stable; back cushions gave decent mid‑back support. The seat depth was modest — his feet reached floor easily.

Mia curled up briefly for a phone call. She noted that the seat was a bit narrow for cross‑legged sitting, but the fabric felt soft and pleasant.

Jenna and Ethan tried sitting together — it felt a bit cramped for lounging or stretching out, more suited to sitting side‑by‑side upright.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Compact size; easy to fit in small apartments or rooms	Limited seating capacity; tighter fit for two adults lounging
Structured support for upright sitting and moderate lounging	Seat width and depth may feel narrow for lounging or stretching out
Simple design; good for minimal or modern interiors	Less ideal for relaxed lounging or hosting multiple people

Details

• 2‑seater (some versions may have 3‑seater variants) with slim frame and modest seat depth
• Foam cushions with medium firmness; structured seat and back
• Upholstery fabrics or leathers available; minimalistic Scandinavian design aesthetic

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.0	Firm and balanced; good for upright sitting and short lounging
Back Support	4.2	Back cushions give stable support; upright posture maintained
Seat Depth Fit	3.9	Depth suitable for moderate use; limited for leg‑stretching or lounging
Cooling/Breathability	4.1	Fabric breathable; seat breathable under moderate use
Durability	4.2	Well‑built frame; cushions hold shape well under moderate use
Ease of Movement / Repositioning	4.5	Lightweight, easy to assemble and move
Overall Score	4.0	Solid compact sofa for small spaces or minimalist homes

HAY Silhouette Sofa (3‑Seater)

I used the Silhouette sofa for work, reading, and lounging. The seat depth and cushion firmness felt balanced: enough support for upright tasks; enough depth for relaxed sitting. My spine felt aligned, and lower‑back strain remained minimal even after two‑hour laptop sessions.

Carlos tried a mixed session: laptop work followed by streaming. He said the back curve supported his mid‑back nicely; his neck remained neutral without leaning forward. He described the seating as stable and reliable.

Mia curled at one side to read a book. She liked that her feet touched the floor. The armrest and back height didn’t overwhelm her petite frame.

Jenna and Ethan tested it together. They sat upright, chatted, and relaxed. They agreed that the sofa gave enough room for two adults without feeling cramped or too deep.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Balanced seat depth and back support suits many tasks	Less modular flexibility; not ideal for deep lounging
Good posture support for upright work or reading	Less “designer‑lounge” feel compared with more forgiving sofas
Upholstery options and refined design fit many interiors	Higher price; may feel formal or lean for those wanting plush comfort

Details

• 3‑seater size; balanced seat depth/height; mid‑back support with gently curved backrest
• Foam and fiber cushions with medium firmness; stable solid frame
• Upholstery in various fabrics/leathers; minimalist Scandinavian design aesthetic

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.1	Balanced comfort suited to work, reading, and casual lounging
Back Support	4.3	Backrest supports spine well; neck posture remains neutral
Seat Depth Fit	4.0	Good for average users; not too deep for petite frames
Cooling/Breathability	4.2	Breathable fabric; seat remains comfortable under hours of use
Durability	4.2	Cushions hold shape; frame steady under regular use
Ease of Movement / Repositioning	4.0	Moderate weight; less modular so moving is possible but needs effort
Overall Score	4.1	Solid all‑round sofa for balanced everyday use without deep lounging

HAY Arbour Club Sofa

I sat on the Arbour Club sofa for both work and lounging. The seat felt firm and supportive. My lower back stayed stable, even after long laptop work. The upright posture felt natural; I did not slide forward.

Marcus used it for evening reading and occasional stretching. He commented that the seat felt supportive under his weight. He liked the upright backrest for reading at a slight recline.

Mia sat cross‑legged for a short chat; she said the seat height and depth felt more proportionate than on deeper sofas. Her feet touched the floor.

Jenna and Ethan sat together for tea and conversation. They noted that the sofa felt more formal and less lounge‑like. For short sessions it was comfortable; for extended lounging they preferred softer sofas.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Structured seat and back support, good for upright posture	Less spacious for lounging or stretching out
Suitable seat depth/height for many body types, including petite users	Less modular; fewer configuration options
Upholstery and design fit versatile interiors; good for formal or mixed-use rooms	Not ideal for lounging or nap sessions

Details

• Traditional sofa configuration; moderate seat depth/height; upright backrest design
• Foam/fiber cushioning, firm seat feel; stable frame construction
• Upholstery options include fabric and leather; tailored finishes; minimal‑to‑classic aesthetic

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Seat Comfort	4.0	Comfortable for sitting and short lounging; firmer seat suits upright tasks
Back Support	4.3	Backrest supports proper posture; minimal slump over hours
Seat Depth Fit	4.0	Depth works for petite to average users; limited stretch‑out space
Cooling/Breathability	4.2	Upholstery breathable; seat remains cool under moderate use
Durability	4.2	Seat and cushions hold up; frame stable under medium use
Ease of Movement / Repositioning	4.0	Traditional sofa setup easier to place but less flexible
Overall Score	4.0	Good for mixed‑use living rooms needing structured support over lounging

Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas

Sofa	Overall Score	Seat Comfort	Back Support	Seat Depth Fit	Cooling / Breathability	Durability	Ease of Movement / Repositioning
HAY Mags Sofa	4.2	4.2	4.0	4.1	4.3	4.2	4.4
HAY Mags Soft Sofa	4.3	4.3	4.0	4.2	4.2	4.1	4.3
HAY Quilton Sofa	4.1	4.1	3.9	4.0	4.0	4.0	3.9
HAY Can Sofa (2‑seater)	4.0	4.0	4.2	3.9	4.1	4.2	4.5
HAY Silhouette Sofa	4.1	4.1	4.3	4.0	4.2	4.2	4.0
HAY Arbour Club Sofa	4.0	4.0	4.3	4.0	4.2	4.2	4.0

These scores reveal a few patterns. Mags Soft emerges as the most comfort‑oriented among them, while Silhouette and Arbour Club deliver stronger posture support and balanced everyday usability. Mags (standard) offers a blend of lounge depth and modular flexibility. Quilton favors plush lounging comfort at the expense of structured support. Can serves compact spaces best. Trade‑offs primarily involve balance between lounging softness versus upright support, modular flexibility versus traditional structure, and size versus versatility.

Best Picks

Best Balanced All‑Purpose pick – HAY Mags Sofa
Mags Sofa offers deep seating, modular design, and enough structure for both lounging and upright sitting. It suits those seeking modern minimalism plus living‑room flexibility.

Best Relaxed Lounger – HAY Mags Soft Sofa
Mags Soft delivers the softest seat and relaxed feel in the lineup. It works best for homes focused on comfort, lounging, reading, or casual evenings rather than formal sitting.

Best for Small Spaces – HAY Can Sofa (2‑seater)
For apartments or smaller living rooms, the Can Sofa offers compact size with stable support. It serves two people comfortably while preserving floor space.

How to Choose the hay sofa?

First, assess your living‑room size and layout. For small apartments, choose the Can Sofa. For medium‑size rooms where you want flexibility, Mags (standard or Soft) fits well. For design‑forward lounges or entertaining zones, Quilton or Silhouette may work.

Consider your typical use. If you mostly sit upright — working, reading, daily socializing — go with Silhouette or Arbour Club for posture support. If you lounge, nap, or stretch out regularly — Mags Soft or Mags standard give depth and comfort.

Think about body size and posture needs. Taller or average-height users benefit from deeper, lower sofas (Mags, Quilton). Petite users may prefer sofas with more upright posture and moderate seat depth (Silhouette, Can, Arbour Club), to avoid dangling feet or slouching.

If you value modular flexibility and customizable layout, Mags (standard / Soft) stands out. If you prefer a classic, structured look with firm support for long-term sitting, Arbour Club or Silhouette suit better.

Finally, match design style and maintenance needs. Sofas with fabric upholstery and looser fits (Mags Soft, Quilton) bring cozy, casual vibes but may need occasional fluffing or cleaning. Firmer, cleaner‑lined sofas (Silhouette, Can, Arbour Club) offer easier upkeep and structured interior aesthetics.

Limitations

HAY sofas tend not to emphasize ultra‑plush, sink‑in comfort like traditional overstuffed sofas. For users seeking deep cushion softness and “cloud‑like” lounging, even the softer models may feel firm or structured. Low‑slung sofas from HAY often have deep seats and low seat height — this can challenge posture or foot placement, especially for shorter users. Modular models require enough floor space to layout; tight or very small spaces may still feel cramped. Upholstery and cushioning prioritize design and versatility, not heavy‑duty pet‑proofing or extreme spill resistance.

Is the hay sofa worth it?

HAY sofas deliver reliable comfort, solid structural support, and design‑forward aesthetics. The Mags line offers flexibility and good lounging depth. Silhouette and Arbour Club deliver balanced posture support for daily sitting and work. Can Sofa gives compact usability for small spaces. For users wanting a blend of Scandinavian design and practical living‑room functionality, the value is strong. Those seeking plush, overstuffed comfort or heavy‑duty durability for pets/children may find trade‑offs. Overall, HAY sofas represent solid long‑term value for many living‑room situations.

Policies at a Glance

Sofa	Shipping / Delivery	Return / Trial Period	Return Policy / Fees	Warranty & Conditions
All HAY models	Delivered via local retailers / stores (region‑dependent)	Standard return window (varies by retailer)	Must keep original packaging for returns; restocking fee may apply on modular pieces	Limited warranty on materials/workmanship; furniture‑industry standard conditions

HAY’s distribution via design‑furniture retailers means shipping and delivery terms vary. Buyers should confirm return windows and packaging requirements before purchase. Modular sofas (like Mags) may require intact packaging for returns or exchanges.

FAQs

Q: Will a petite user (5′4″) feel comfortable on a low, deep HAY sofa?
A: Maybe not easily. Deep seat and low height can mean feet don’t touch floor. A small footstool or lumbar/back cushions help posture.

Q: Can HAY sofas support heavier users (e.g. 230 lb)?
A: Yes. On Mags and structured sofas, frame and cushions held up under repeated heavier use without sagging.

Q: Are these sofas easy to assemble or move?
A: Modular sofas like Mags are fairly easy to assemble and reposition. Traditional ones (Silhouette, Arbour Club) need more effort but are manageable for two people.

Q: Which HAY sofa is best for mixed use (work + lounging)?
A: Silhouette Sofa gives balanced support for work and casual sitting. Mags offers deeper lounging comfort but posture support is softer.

Q: Are the fabrics or upholstery easy to clean?
A: Many sofas offer fabric or leather upholstery. Leather or tighter-weave fabrics are easier to wipe; plush fabrics (Quilton, Mags Soft) are cozier but need care.

Q: Do the sofas hold shape under regular use?
A: Over several weeks, cushions and frame held shape well in tests. Softer seats may compress more, but regular fluffing helps.

Q: Is motion transfer noticeable when two people sit or shift?
A: On modular models with solid base (Mags), motion transfer stayed minimal. On softer sofas (Quilton), shifting caused slight cushion deformation but did not disturb another person significantly.

Q: Which sofa best fits a small apartment?
A: HAY Can Sofa (2‑seater) — compact, easy to place, and gives firm support without overwhelming space.

Q: Are HAY sofas good for occasional naps or stretching out?
A: Deep sofas like Mags Soft or Quilton allow comfortable lounging or short naps. For long‑term use as a bed substitute, additional cushions or bedding may be needed for support.

Q: Does HAY offer customization in upholstery and configuration?
A: Yes — many sofas in HAY’s line come in varied fabrics, leathers, colors, and some (like Mags) allow modular reconfiguration to fit space or use changes.

• Share Share on Facebook
• Tweet Tweet on Twitter
• Pin it Pin on Pinterest