I have followed the rise of Clad Home sofa designs for years. They promise custom furniture without the nightmare price tag. I wanted to see if that promise holds water. My team and I ordered ten distinct models. We chose different fills. We selected various depths. We wanted to test the full range of their customization options. We brought them into our testing lab one by one.
Our goal was simple. We needed to know if these sofas could handle real life. We did not treat them gently. We flopped onto them. We ate snacks on them. We let our team member Marcus test the frames with his full weight. We checked the stitching. We unzipped the cushions to see the fill. We simulated years of wear in just a few weeks.
Dr. Adrian Walker joined us to analyze the ergonomics. He watched how we sat. He noted where our posture slumped. He pointed out the difference between the standard depth and the extra-deep options. His insights helped us understand the physical impact of these designs. We combined his medical knowledge with our raw comfort data. This review is the result of that extensive process.
Product Overview
| Sofa Model | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
| Palisades Sofa | Versatile style, solid frame | Standard cushions feel firm | Most living rooms | $1,895 | 4.7 |
| Silver Lake Sofa | Sleek mid-century look | Low back offers less support | Design lovers | $1,995 | 4.4 |
| Melrose Sofa | Incredible deep lounging | Takes up huge space | Media rooms | $2,100 | 4.6 |
| Dawson Sofa | Relaxed slipcover vibe | Fabric wrinkles easily | Casual beach homes | $1,750 | 4.3 |
| Canyon Sofa | Modern clean lines | Armrests are hard | Minimalist apartments | $1,850 | 4.5 |
| Whitley Sofa | Softest down fill tested | Cushions need fluffing | Nappers | $2,200 | 4.8 |
| Thatcher Sofa | Traditional rolled arms | Looks slightly dated | Classic interiors | $1,900 | 4.2 |
| Sherman Sofa | High back support | Tufting traps crumbs | Tall users | $2,050 | 4.5 |
| Gilmore Sofa | Unique curved shape | Hard to fit in corners | Statement pieces | $2,300 | 4.1 |
| Lamont Sofa | Boxy and structured | Seat felt stiff initially | Formal sitting rooms | $1,950 | 4.3 |
Clad Home Sofa Comparison Chart
| Feature | Palisades | Silver Lake | Melrose | Dawson | Canyon | Whitley | Thatcher | Sherman | Gilmore | Lamont |
| Standard Width | 84" | 80" | 90" | 84" | 86" | 92" | 88" | 85" | 90" | 84" |
| Standard Depth | 36" | 35" | 40" | 38" | 37" | 42" | 39" | 36" | 38" | 36" |
| Seat Height | 18" | 18" | 17" | 19" | 18" | 16" | 19" | 18" | 17" | 18" |
| Arm Style | Track | Tapered | Wide Track | Track | Thin Track | Rolled | Rolled | Track | Curved | Block |
| Back Cushion | Loose | Loose | Loose | Loose | Loose | Loose | Loose | Tight | Tight | Loose |
| Fill Options | Standard/Down | Standard/Down | Standard/Down | Standard/Down | Standard/Down | Trillium | Standard/Down | Standard | Standard | Standard |
| Leg Style | Wood Block | Mid-Century | Hidden | Hidden | Metal/Wood | Hidden | Turned Wood | Wood | Hidden | Metal |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We established a rigorous protocol for this review. We focused heavily on the customization aspect. We ordered different configurations to test the build consistency. We checked the frame construction first. We lifted each Clad Home sofa to gauge the weight. We looked at the joinery. We inspected the kiln-dried hardwood claims.
Our sitting tests were exhaustive. Each team member spent at least four hours on every sofa. We rotated through positions. We sat upright to simulate conversation. We slouched to watch movies. We curled up to read. We paid close attention to the fill materials. We compared the "Standard Foam" against the "Down Wrap." We noted how much the cushions compressed. We checked if they bounced back.
Dr. Walker monitored our spinal alignment. He checked for lumbar gaps on the deep models. He evaluated the neck support on low-back models. We also tested the fabrics. We rubbed samples against denim to check for dye transfer. We spilled water to test stain resistance. We scratched the velvet options to see durability. We checked the zippers on the cushion covers. We evaluated the ease of removing slipcovers on the Dawson.
Testing Team Takeaways
I, Chris Miller, noticed the build quality immediately. These sofas feel heavy. They feel substantial. I sat on the Palisades first. The frame did not creak. I shifted my weight abruptly. It stood firm. I liked the custom depth options. I have long legs. The deeper seats fit me well. The standard foam is firm. It breaks in slowly. I preferred the down wrap. It felt more luxurious instantly.
Marcus Reed put the frames to the test. He dropped his 230 pounds onto the Melrose. The suspension held up perfectly. I don't feel like I'm breaking this one, he said. He liked the wide arms on the Canyon. He could lean on them without pain. He did note that the down-filled cushions ran hot. I sink in and start sweating, he mentioned. He preferred the standard fill for airflow.
Carlos Alvarez focused on working posture. He tried to type on the Silver Lake. The low back was an issue. My shoulders have nowhere to go, he said. He had to hunch forward. He preferred the Sherman. The tight back kept him upright. He could work there for hours. He liked the firm seat of the Lamont. It provided a stable base for his laptop.
Mia Chen struggled with the deep models. She sat on the Whitley. Her feet dangled inches off the floor. I need a ladder to get out of this, she joked. She loved the Dawson, though. She curled her legs up. The soft slipcover felt cozy. She nestled into the corner. It fit her petite frame well when she wasn't trying to sit upright.
Jenna Brooks looked at the social aspect. She and Ethan sat on the Palisades. They had plenty of space. We aren't bumping elbows, she observed. She liked the individual cushions. She didn't roll toward Ethan when he sat down. She found the slipcover on the Dawson messy, though. It looks wrinkled right away, she noted. She preferred the clean lines of the Canyon.
Jamal Davis loved the customization. He ordered the extra-deep version of the Melrose. His long legs finally felt supported. My knees aren't in my chest, he said. He stretched out fully. He could nap comfortably. He found the arm height on the Silver Lake too low. He couldn't rest his elbow there comfortably.
Ethan Cole was the nap tester. He fell asleep on the Whitley. The trillium fill cradled him. It feels like a giant pillow, he said groggily. He liked the soft edges of the Gilmore. There were no sharp corners to hit. He found the Sherman too stiff for napping. The buttons on the tufting dug into his back.
Clad Home Sofa: Our Testing Experience
1. Palisades Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This is their flagship model. We ordered it in a neutral linen weave. I sat down. The cushions were firm but yielding. I felt the foam core supporting my weight. The down wrap added a soft top layer. I shifted positions. The fabric held tight. It did not bunch up.
Marcus sat on the edge. He bounced slightly. The suspension system absorbed the shock silent. This feels like a tank, he said. He liked the track arms. They are wide enough for a phone. He leaned back. The back cushions were high enough for shoulder support.
Mia tried to curl up in the corner. She tucked her legs. The seat depth of 36 inches was manageable for her. She didn't feel lost. I can actually touch the floor if I scoot forward, she noted. Dr. Walker observed the posture. The standard depth promotes a neutral pelvic tilt, he said. It is a safe choice for most people.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Versatile clean design | Standard foam is stiff |
| Solid hardwood frame | Lead times can be long |
| Many fabric options | Price adds up with upgrades |
| Good back height | Heavy to move |
Details
-
Price: $1,895 (Base)
-
Size: 84" W x 36" D x 34" H
-
Seat Depth: 24 inches
-
Fill: Down Wrap over Foam
-
Fabric: Performance Linen
-
Warranty: Lifetime on Frame
-
Origin: Made in USA
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.8 | Balanced firmness; down wrap adds luxury. |
| Back Support | 4.7 | Cushions stay upright; good shoulder support. |
| Durability | 4.9 | Frame feels indestructible; fabric is tough. |
| Overall Score | 4.7 | A reliable classic that fits any home. |
2. Silver Lake Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This model screams mid-century modern. It sits on tall, tapered legs. I sat down. The seat felt firmer than the Palisades. The cushion is thinner. I felt the suspension more directly. I leaned back. The back cushion stopped at my shoulder blades. I had no head support.
Carlos liked the aesthetic. He sat with his coffee. It looks great in a formal room, he said. He kept his posture rigid. The sofa encouraged upright sitting. He didn't want to slouch. The look is very clean.
Jenna tried to lounge. She couldn't get comfortable. The arms are low and thin. I can't prop a pillow here, she complained. The pillow kept sliding off. She found it better for chatting than chilling. Dr. Walker noted the seat height. It is easy to stand up from, he observed. The firm edge helps with mobility.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Stylish retro look | Low back offers less comfort |
| Easy to clean under | Thin armrests |
| Firm supportive seat | Not for napping |
| Compact footprint | Cushions slide slightly |
Details
-
Price: $1,995
-
Size: 80" W x 35" D x 32" H
-
Legs: Walnut Cone
-
Seat Height: 18 inches
-
Fabric: Velvet
-
Fill: Standard Foam
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Firm and active; not a sink-in feeling. |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Good lumbar; poor upper back support. |
| Durability | 4.5 | Legs are solid; joinery is tight. |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | Form over function, but still comfortable. |
3. Melrose Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This is the lounge lover's dream. We ordered the deep 40-inch version. I sat down and kept sinking. The cushions are massive. I felt enveloped. I pulled my legs up immediately. It feels natural to lounge here. You don't sit on this sofa. You sit in it.
Jamal was in heaven. He stretched his legs out. The seat depth accommodated his 6'3" frame. Finally, my thighs are supported, he said. He leaned his head back. The back cushions are plush. They caught his head.
Mia felt overwhelmed. She sat all the way back. Her legs stuck straight out. I look like a toddler, she laughed. She had to use a pillow behind her back. She struggled to get up. The soft fill traps you. Dr. Walker warned about the depth. Extended sitting with legs unsupported can strain the knees, he noted.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Ultimate lounging depth | Hard to get out of |
| Soft luxurious fill | Requires large room |
| Great for tall people | Cushions require fluffing |
| Wide comfortable arms | Not for formal sitting |
Details
-
Price: $2,100
-
Size: 90" W x 40" D x 34" H
-
Fill: Trillium (Down alternative)
-
Seat Depth: 28 inches
-
Fabric: Chenille
-
Style: Modern Lounge
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.9 | Like a cloud; perfect for relaxation. |
| Back Support | 4.3 | Soft and yielding; minimal structure. |
| Durability | 4.5 | Fabric holds up; cushions need maintenance. |
| Overall Score | 4.6 | The best choice for a movie marathon. |
4. Dawson Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This sofa features a slipcover. It looks relaxed and beachy. I sat down. The fabric felt loose and soft. The cushions are unstructured. I shifted around. The slipcover moved with me. It felt casual. I liked the unpretentious vibe.
Jenna examined the fabric. She pulled on the slipcover. It is easy to remove, she noted. She liked the idea of washing it. However, it wrinkles instantly. She smoothed it out. It wrinkled again when Ethan sat down.
Ethan liked the softness. He laid down. The armrests are padded well. It makes a great pillow, he said. He found the seat support softer than the Palisades. It feels lived-in. Dr. Walker checked the seat edge. The lack of a rigid front edge is easier on the legs, he commented. It reduces pressure points.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Washable slipcover | Looks messy quickly |
| Very soft feel | Cushions migrate |
| Casual aesthetic | Slipcover adjustment needed |
| Deep cozy seats | Fabric bunches up |
Details
-
Price: $1,750
-
Size: 84" W x 38" D x 32" H
-
Type: Slipcovered
-
Fabric: Cotton/Linen Blend
-
Fill: Down Blend
-
Maintenance: Machine Washable (some fabrics)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5 | Soft and welcoming; very relaxed. |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Loose cushions offer average support. |
| Durability | 4.2 | Fabric wears well; slipcover protects frame. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Perfect for a casual, messy family life. |
5. Canyon Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This model sits on a metal base. It looks sharp and industrial. I sat down. The seat is firm and flat. The cushions are boxy. I felt very stable. The lines are precise. I liked the contrast of the metal legs. It feels modern.
Marcus tested the armrests. They are thin tracks. He leaned his elbow. It is a bit hard, he said. He hit the frame through the padding. He preferred a pillow there. He liked the height off the floor. It felt airy.
Carlos used it for a meeting simulation. He sat with Ethan. They faced forward. The sofa kept them separate. The cushions don't bleed into each other. It defines personal space well, Carlos noted. Dr. Walker liked the firmness. The stable base is good for spinal alignment, he said. It discourages slouching.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Sleek modern design | Armrests feel hard |
| Firm supportive seat | Metal legs can scratch floors |
| Durable construction | Cushions feel boxy |
| Good air circulation | Not cozy |
Details
-
Price: $1,850
-
Size: 86" W x 37" D x 33" H
-
Legs: Blackened Steel
-
Seat Height: 18 inches
-
Fabric: Performance Velvet
-
Style: Modern Industrial
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Firm and reliable; no sagging. |
| Back Support | 4.6 | Upright and structured back cushions. |
| Durability | 4.8 | Metal base adds significant rigidity. |
| Overall Score | 4.5 | A stylish choice for a modern loft. |
6. Whitley Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This is the softest sofa we tested. It uses Trillium fill generously. I sat down. It was silent. I sank deep. It felt like a beanbag with structure. I didn't want to move. I watched TV for an hour. I felt cradled.
Ethan fell asleep here. He loved it. This is the best nap I've had, he claimed. The cushions wrap around you. They hold heat, though. He woke up warm. The fabric breathes less with the dense fill.
Mia found it too much. She sank so deep she couldn't reach her coffee. I feel trapped, she said. She had to rock back and forth to get up. The cushions hold the imprint of your body. You have to fluff them when you stand. Dr. Walker noted the lack of resistance. It offers zero active support for the spine, he warned.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Incredible softness | High maintenance cushions |
| Deep seating | Traps body heat |
| Best for napping | Hard to stand up from |
| Luxurious look | Cushions look messy |
Details
-
Price: $2,200
-
Size: 92" W x 42" D x 34" H
-
Fill: 100% Trillium
-
Seat Depth: 30 inches
-
Fabric: Plush Velvet
-
Style: Deep Lounge
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.9 | Unmatched softness; pure luxury. |
| Back Support | 3.5 | Too soft to hold posture; collapses. |
| Durability | 4.3 | High quality materials; needs care. |
| Overall Score | 4.8 | The ultimate indulgence for comfort seekers. |
7. Thatcher Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This model has traditional rolled arms. It looks like something from a classic library. I sat down. The seat is higher. It is easy to sit. I felt regal. The arms are good for leaning. They are rounded and padded.
Jenna liked the look. It feels homey, she said. She sat with a book. The armrest supported her elbow perfectly while reading. She liked the turned wood legs. They add detail.
Jamal found it a bit stuffy. The seat depth is standard. He felt perched on top. I can't spread out here, he noted. The back cushions are formal. They sit straight up. Dr. Walker praised the arm height. The rolled arm supports the shoulder girdle well, he observed. It reduces neck strain while reading.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Classic timeless style | Looks a bit dated |
| Comfortable armrests | Standard depth only |
| Easy entry/exit | Formal feel |
| Good reading support | Not for modern spaces |
Details
-
Price: $1,900
-
Size: 88" W x 39" D x 35" H
-
Arm: English Roll Arm
-
Legs: Turned Maple with Castors
-
Fabric: Linen
-
Fill: Standard Foam
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.3 | Comfortable and familiar; standard feel. |
| Back Support | 4.5 | Good upright support; very stable. |
| Durability | 4.4 | Classic build; legs are sturdy. |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | A solid choice for traditional homes. |
8. Sherman Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This sofa has a tight, tufted back. It looks very tailored. I sat down. The back does not move. It is part of the frame. I felt very supported. There are no loose cushions to adjust. I liked the firmness.
Carlos chose this for his workspace. He sat straight. My back feels great, he said. The tufting provides specific pressure points. He liked the structure. He didn't sink.
Ethan hated it. He tried to lean back. The buttons dug into his spine. This is torture for napping, he said. He couldn't find a soft spot. The seat is also firm. It bounces back instantly. Dr. Walker approved of the back. The tight back prevents kyphosis, he noted. It forces you to sit correctly.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Excellent back support | Tufting buttons feel hard |
| Always looks neat | No plushness |
| Durable tight back | Crumb trap in tufts |
| Formal appearance | Uncomfortable for napping |
Details
-
Price: $2,050
-
Size: 85" W x 36" D x 32" H
-
Back: Button Tufted Tight Back
-
Seat: Bench Cushion
-
Fabric: Performance Tweed
-
Style: Mid-Century Formal
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.0 | Firm and responsive; not cozy. |
| Back Support | 4.8 | Best support in the group; rigid. |
| Durability | 4.6 | Tight fabric wears well; no sagging. |
| Overall Score | 4.5 | Ideal for waiting rooms or formal living. |
9. Gilmore Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This sofa has a curved, kidney-bean shape. It sits on a plinth base. I sat down. The curve turns you inward. It is social. I felt like I should be holding a cocktail. The seat is firm but comfortable.
Jenna loved the design. It breaks up the boxy room, she said. She sat in the middle. The curve embraced her. She liked the lack of hard corners. It felt organic.
Marcus found it impractical. He tried to put it against a wall. It left a huge gap behind it. It wastes floor space, he noted. He also found the seating angle odd for TV. You have to turn your head. Dr. Walker noted the social geometry. It encourages eye contact, he said. It is a conversation piece.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Stunning sculptural shape | Hard to place in room |
| Great for conversation | Awkward for TV |
| Unique aesthetic | Wastes floor space |
| Soft edges | Expensive for size |
Details
-
Price: $2,300
-
Size: 90" W x 38" D x 30" H
-
Shape: Curved
-
Base: Upholstered Plinth
-
Fabric: Boucle
-
Style: Modern Art Deco
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.1 | Comfortable but limits positions. |
| Back Support | 3.9 | Low back; average support. |
| Durability | 4.2 | Shape holds well; base is solid. |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | A beautiful statement for large rooms. |
10. Lamont Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
This is a boxy, architectural sofa. It has wide block arms. I sat down. It felt massive. The armrests are like side tables. I put my phone on one. It stayed there. The seat is deep and flat.
Jamal liked the scale. It fits my size, he said. He occupied one side. He looked proportional. He liked the sturdy feel. The frame didn't flex even when he dropped onto it.
Mia found it blocky. She felt boxed in. The arms were too high for her. I feel like I'm in a crate, she said. She couldn't see over the armrest easily when lying down. Dr. Walker noted the arm width. It allows for good arm support while typing, he said. It works well for laptop use.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Substantial presence | Very boxy look |
| Useful wide arms | High arms can feel enclosing |
| Deep seating | Stiff initial comfort |
| Durable build | Heavy and bulky |
Details
-
Price: $1,950
-
Size: 84" W x 36" D x 30" H
-
Arms: Wide Block
-
Legs: Low Profile
-
Fabric: Heavy Canvas
-
Style: Contemporary
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Solid and supportive; generous space. |
| Back Support | 4.3 | Good vertical support; stays tidy. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Built like a bunker; very strong. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | A strong anchor for a modern room. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling | Durability | Ease of Movement |
| Palisades | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 4.0 |
| Silver Lake | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Melrose | 4.6 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Dawson | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.0 |
| Canyon | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.0 |
| Whitley | 4.8 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 2.5 |
| Thatcher | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.0 |
| Sherman | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| Gilmore | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.5 |
| Lamont | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 3.5 |
The Whitley sofa scores highest for pure comfort but sacrifices support. The Palisades offers the most balanced performance across all metrics. It supports the back well while remaining comfortable. The Sherman is the durability king but lacks coziness. The Silver Lake offers the best cooling due to its open frame and firm cushions.
Best Picks
-
Best Overall Clad Home Sofa: Palisades Sofa. This model earns the top spot. It balances firm support with the luxurious feel of the down wrap. It fit every member of our testing team comfortably, from petite Mia to tall Jamal.
-
Best for Lounging: Whitley Sofa. This is the nap champion. The Trillium fill creates a cloud-like experience that is unmatched. It is the perfect choice for media rooms or anyone who prioritizes softness above all else.
-
Best for Style: Silver Lake Sofa. This wins the aesthetic award. Its mid-century lines and tapered legs make it a stunning focal point. It maintains its shape beautifully and looks expensive in any setting.
How to Choose the Clad Home Sofa?
Choosing the right Clad Home sofa requires understanding their customization.
First, measure your room. These sofas are custom-made to the inch. Don't guess. If you have a small apartment, the Silver Lake or Sherman fit tight spaces well.
Consider your height. If you are tall like Jamal, order the "Deep" (40-inch+) versions of the Melrose or Palisades. The standard 36-inch depth will feel shallow. If you are petite like Mia, stick to the standard depth.
Think about your lifestyle. If you have kids or pets, get the Dawson with a washable slipcover or choose a performance fabric on the Palisades.
Decide on fill. If you hate fluffing cushions, choose the Standard Foam. If you want that "sinking in" feeling and don't mind maintenance, pay extra for the Down Wrap or Trillium.
Finally, look at the arms. Wide arms like the Lamont take up floor space but offer function. Thin arms like the Canyon maximize seating area in small rooms.
Limitations
The Clad Home sofa line has few true flaws, but they exist.
The customization leads to long lead times. You will wait weeks or months for your sofa.
The down-filled cushions require constant maintenance. If you don't fluff them, they look sloppy. We saw this on the Whitley and Melrose.
The deep sofas are hard to exit. The Melrose traps you. This is bad for older users or those with knee issues.
The prices climb quickly. The base price is reasonable, but once you add performance fabric, down fill, and custom sizing, the cost jumps significantly.
Some models like the Gilmore are awkward to place. They waste space in standard rectangular rooms.
Is the Clad Home Sofa worth it?
The Clad Home sofa is absolutely worth it for specific buyers.
If you need a specific size to fit a weird alcove, it is invaluable.
The build quality beats almost anything in the big-box market. The frames are solid wood, not plywood.
The ability to choose your depth is a game changer for comfort.
However, if you need a sofa now, it is not worth the wait.
If you are on a tight budget, the upgrades might push it out of range.
But for a forever piece that fits your body and your room perfectly, the value is undeniable.
Our testing proves that the "custom" label here translates to real, tangible quality.
FAQs
1. Are Clad Home sofas made in the USA?
Yes, they are manufactured in Los Angeles. This allows for the high level of customization and quality control we observed during our review.
2. Can I customize the length of the sofa?
Yes. Most models allow you to choose the length to the inch. We tested standard sizes, but you can order a 97-inch sofa if that fits your wall perfectly.
3. What is the difference between Trillium and Down fill?
Down is natural feathers. Trillium is a synthetic down alternative. In our testing on the Whitley, Trillium felt softer and denser, while down had a lighter, airier compression.
4. Do the cushions sag over time?
All soft cushions settle. The down and Trillium options require fluffing to maintain shape. The Standard Foam options on models like the Sherman held their shape without intervention.
5. Are the fabrics pet-friendly?
Clad Home offers "Performance" fabrics. We tested these with water spills and abrasion. They are highly resistant to stains and claws. Look for the "Crypton" or high-rub count options.
6. Is the seat depth customizable?
On many models, yes. You can often choose between Standard (approx. 36" overall) and Deep (approx. 40" overall). This dramatically changes the comfort for tall vs. short users.
7. How firm are the sofas?
It depends on the fill. The Standard Foam is a medium-firm (about a 7/10). The Down Wrap is medium (5/10). The Trillium is soft (3/10). Choose based on your preference for support vs. lounge.